2829. Determine the Minimum Sum of a k-avoiding Array
Problem Description
In this problem, we are working with a very specific type of array called a "k-avoiding" array. An array is considered to be k-avoiding if there are no two distinct elements within it that add up to the number k
. Our objective is to construct a k-avoiding array that has a length of n
, where n
is a given integer, and we want to make sure that the sum of the elements of this array is as small as possible. We're asked to find and return this minimum possible sum.
Intuition
The key to solving this problem is to avoid any pairs of numbers that sum up to k
. A straightforward approach is to start from the smallest positive integer and keep adding distinct numbers to the array, making sure that none of these integer pairs sum to k
.
We can do this by maintaining a set of integers that should not be included in the array (to avoid summing to k
). As we iterate and add a new element i
to the array, we also add k - i
to the set of integers to avoid because if k - i
was ever included later, it would sum with i
to make k
, violating the k-avoiding property.
If we encounter a number that is already in the set of numbers to avoid, we simply increment i
to find the next suitable candidate.
This approach will ensure that we are always adding the smallest possible integers to our array, hence achieving the minimum possible sum for a k-avoiding array of length n
.
Solution Approach
The solution involves a greedy approach and a set to keep track of visited numbers and their complementary numbers that sum to k
. Here is a step-by-step breakdown of the algorithm using the provided solution code.
-
Initialize a sum
s
to0
, which will hold the sum of the k-avoiding array values, and an indexi
to1
, which is the smallest positive integer we can add to our array. -
Initialize an empty set
vis
to keep track of numbers that are already either used in the array or that should be avoided because their corresponding pairs would sum up tok
. -
Iterate
n
times, since we need to addn
distinct integers to our k-avoiding array. For each iteration:- Increment
i
until you find a value that is not present in thevis
set. This is the next smallest number that can be added to the array without risking a sum ofk
with any other number already in the array. - Add
i
to thevis
set because it is now part of our k-avoiding array. - Add
k - i
to thevis
set to avoid any future numbers from creating a pair withi
that sums tok
. - Add
i
to our running totals
, asi
is now a confirmed element of our k-avoiding array.
- Increment
-
After we have added
n
numbers to the array, we returns
, which now holds the minimum possible sum of the k-avoiding array.
The two key data structures and patterns used in this solution are:
- Greedy Algorithm: By always choosing the next smallest integer not yet visited or restricted, we ensure that we are minimizing the sum at each step, leading to a global minimum sum.
- Set: By using a set for
vis
, we can quickly check if a number has already been used or is off-limits and thus efficiently manage our pool of potential array elements.
This algorithm is efficient because it operates on a simple principle of avoidance and uses sets for fast lookup, adding up to an overall time complexity of O(n) since we perform a constant amount of work for each of the n iterations to construct the k-avoiding array.
Ready to land your dream job?
Unlock your dream job with a 2-minute evaluator for a personalized learning plan!
Start EvaluatorExample Walkthrough
Let's consider constructing a k-avoiding array with k = 7
and length n = 5
. We want to end up with an array which has no two distinct elements that add up to 7, and with the smallest possible sum.
-
We initialize the sum
s = 0
and indexi = 1
which is our starting point for choosing array elements. Our setvis
is also initialized to an empty set. -
Now, we will add numbers to our k-avoiding array, while also updating the set
vis
with each new number and the number that when combined with it adds up to our target k (7). Our loop will runn
times. -
On the first iteration,
i = 1
is not invis
, so we can add it to our array. We then updatevis
to include1
and7 - 1 = 6
(to avoid later). The sums
now becomess = 1
. -
On the second iteration, we try
i = 2
. Since2
is not invis
, we can use it. We updatevis
by adding2
and7 - 2 = 5
. The sums
becomess = 1 + 2 = 3
. -
On the third iteration,
i = 3
is not invis
, and its pair that would sum to7
is4
which is not invis
yet either, so we can add3
safely. We updatevis
with3
and4
. The sums
is nows = 3 + 3 = 6
. -
The fourth iteration, however, is interesting—
i
is incremented to4
, but4
is invis
, indicating a sum with3
would equalk = 7
, so we cannot use it. We incrementi
to5
, which is also invis
. We keep incrementing until we reachi = 8
, which is safe to use. We add8
and its pair7 - 8 = -1
(although negative numbers are not relevant for our case, we're working with positive integers) tovis
, and update our sum tos = 6 + 8 = 14
. -
On our final iteration,
i = 9
is not invis
, so we can use it safely in our k-avoiding array. We add9
and its pair7 - 9 = -2
tovis
, even though those negative numbers won't impact our positive integer set. The final sums
is14 + 9 = 23
.
Our final k-avoiding array might look like [1, 2, 3, 8, 9]
which has no elements that add up to 7
, and the sum of its elements is minimum possible, which is 23
.
The steps effectively demonstrate a greedy approach, continuously choosing the next smallest integer not in the avoidance set, and efficiently constructing a k-avoiding array with the smallest possible sum.
Solution Implementation
1class Solution:
2 def minimumSum(self, num_elements: int, target: int) -> int:
3 # Initialize the sum and the starting integer
4 current_sum, current_int = 0, 1
5
6 # This set will keep track of the visited or used integers
7 visited = set()
8
9 # Iterate for the number of elements required
10 for _ in range(num_elements):
11 # Avoid using integers already in the visited set
12 while current_int in visited:
13 current_int += 1
14
15 # Add the current integer to the visited set
16 visited.add(current_int)
17
18 # Add the complement of current_int with respect to the target
19 visited.add(target - current_int)
20
21 # Add the current integer to the sum
22 current_sum += current_int
23
24 # Return the calculated sum
25 return current_sum
26
27# Example usage:
28# solution = Solution()
29# print(solution.minimumSum(4, 10)) # Example call to the method
30
1class Solution {
2 public int minimumSum(int numElements, int cancellationFactor) {
3 int sum = 0; // Variable to keep track of the sum of the chosen elements
4 int smallestEligible = 1; // Variable to store the smallest eligible number that can be used
5 boolean[] visited = new boolean[numElements * numElements + cancellationFactor + 1]; // Array to mark visited numbers
6
7 // Repeat until all 'numElements' elements have been added
8 while (numElements-- > 0) {
9 // Loop to find the next unvisited number starting from smallestEligible
10 while (visited[smallestEligible]) {
11 ++smallestEligible;
12 }
13
14 // Mark this number as visited
15 visited[smallestEligible] = true;
16
17 // If the number is large enough, mark its complementary number (relative to 'cancellationFactor') as visited
18 if (cancellationFactor >= smallestEligible) {
19 visited[cancellationFactor - smallestEligible] = true;
20 }
21
22 // Add the number to the sum
23 sum += smallestEligible;
24 }
25
26 // Return the computed sum
27 return sum;
28 }
29}
30
1#include <vector>
2#include <cstring>
3
4class Solution {
5public:
6 int minimumSum(int numElements, int delta) {
7 int sum = 0; // Used to store the sum of chosen elements
8 int currentElement = 1; // Starting element for selection
9 // Vector to keep track of visited elements, initialized to false
10 std::vector<bool> visited(numElements * numElements + delta + 1, false);
11
12 // Process each element, decrementing numElements as we go
13 while (numElements--) {
14 // Find the first unvisited element starting from currentElement
15 while (visited[currentElement]) {
16 ++currentElement;
17 }
18 // Mark this element as visited
19 visited[currentElement] = true;
20 // If delta is sufficient, mark the corresponding element as visited
21 if (delta >= currentElement) {
22 visited[delta - currentElement] = true;
23 }
24 // Add the current element to the sum
25 sum += currentElement;
26 }
27 return sum; // Return the computed sum
28 }
29};
30
1function minimumSum(numElements: number, offset: number): number {
2 let sum = 0; // Will hold the sum of the minimum elements
3 let currentElement = 1; // Start with the first natural number
4 // An array to keep track of visited numbers; initialized with 'false'
5 const visited = Array<boolean>(numElements * numElements + offset + 1).fill(false);
6
7 // Iterate until we have selected 'numElements' elements
8 while (numElements--) {
9 // Find the next current element that has not been visited
10 while (visited[currentElement]) {
11 ++currentElement;
12 }
13
14 // Mark the current element as visited
15 visited[currentElement] = true;
16
17 // If the offset minus the current element is non-negative, mark it as visited
18 if (offset >= currentElement) {
19 visited[offset - currentElement] = true;
20 }
21
22 // Accumulate the sum of selected elements
23 sum += currentElement;
24 }
25
26 // Return the sum of the minimum elements
27 return sum;
28}
29
Time and Space Complexity
The given Python code aims to find the minimum sum of a sequence of n
unique numbers, whereby for each selected number i
, the number k - i
is not selected. It initializes a sum s
to 0, an index i
to 1, and a set vis
to track visited numbers.
Time Complexity
The time complexity of the code depends on the loop that runs n
times – once for each number we need to find. Inside this loop, there is a while i in vis
loop that keeps incrementing i
until it finds a non-visited number. In the worst-case scenario, this inner while loop can run for each number from 1 to n
if all are previously marked as visited. However, in practice, the loop will run considerably fewer times than n
for each outer loop iteration, because it only needs to find the next unvisited number.
Assuming U(n)
to be the average number of iterations for finding the next unvisited number over all n
iterations, the time complexity can be approximated as O(n * U(n))
. Since it's difficult to precisely define U(n)
, we can consider it as a factor that is less than n
. However, for the sake of upper-bound estimation, let's consider U(n)
in the worst case to be n
, which would give us a time complexity of O(n^2)
in the worst case.
Space Complexity
The space complexity is easier to analyze. The code only uses a set to store the visited numbers. At most, this set will contain 2n
elements (each element and its complement with respect to k
), so the space complexity is O(n)
.
Learn more about how to find time and space complexity quickly using problem constraints.
Which algorithm should you use to find a node that is close to the root of the tree?
Recommended Readings
Greedy Introduction div class responsive iframe iframe src https www youtube com embed WTslqPbj7I title YouTube video player frameborder 0 allow accelerometer autoplay clipboard write encrypted media gyroscope picture in picture web share allowfullscreen iframe div When do we use greedy Greedy algorithms tend to solve optimization problems Typically they will ask you to calculate the max min of some value Commonly you may see this phrased in the problem as max min longest shortest largest smallest etc These keywords can be identified by just scanning
Math for Technical Interviews How much math do I need to know for technical interviews The short answer is about high school level math Computer science is often associated with math and some universities even place their computer science department under the math faculty However the reality is that you
LeetCode Patterns Your Personal Dijkstra's Algorithm to Landing Your Dream Job The goal of AlgoMonster is to help you get a job in the shortest amount of time possible in a data driven way We compiled datasets of tech interview problems and broke them down by patterns This way we
Want a Structured Path to Master System Design Too? Don’t Miss This!