2425. Bitwise XOR of All Pairings
Problem Description
In the given problem, we have two arrays nums1
and nums2
made up of non-negative integers. We need to create a virtual array nums3
, which would contain the results of performing the bitwise XOR operation on every possible pair formed by taking one number from nums1
and another from nums2
. However, instead of generating nums3
explicitly, we are asked to directly calculate the bitwise XOR of all the elements it would contain.
In simpler terms, imagine we have, for example, nums1 = [1, 2]
and nums2 = [3, 4]
. The pairs and the bitwise XOR would be as follows:
- 1 XOR 3
- 1 XOR 4
- 2 XOR 3
- 2 XOR 4
We suspect nums3
would be [1 XOR 3, 1 XOR 4, 2 XOR 3, 2 XOR 4]
. Our task is to find the cumulative XOR of these results, i.e., (1 XOR 3) XOR (1 XOR 4) XOR (2 XOR 3) XOR (2 XOR 4)
, without actually generating the intermediate array nums3
.
Intuition
To understand the solution, let us first consider a property of the XOR operation: XORing the same number twice cancels it out, resulting in zero.
Now, let's analyze when a number in one of the arrays (nums1
or nums2
) would be XORed an even or odd number of times:
- If
nums2
has an even number of elements, each element innums1
is XORed with the elements innums2
an even number of times, which means that their overall effect will be zero (since any number XORed with itself an even number of times is zero). - If
nums2
has an odd number of elements, each element innums1
is XORed with the elements innums2
an odd number of times, which means the numbers innums1
should be considered once in the final XOR calculation. - The same logic applies when considering the elements in
nums2
with respect to the even or odd count of elements innums1
.
So, if the length of one of the arrays is odd, we need to consider each element in the other array for the final XOR calculation. If the lengths of both arrays are even, none of the elements are considered since the even-odd pairing would cancel out their effect.
With this intuition, we arrive at the solution approach: we initially set an answer variable ans
to 0. We then check if the length of nums2
is odd and XOR all elements in nums1
to ans
. Then we check if the length of nums1
is odd and XOR all elements in nums2
to ans
. The final value of ans
is the XOR of all elements that would be in nums3
.
Solution Approach
The solution uses a simple but clever observation about the XOR operation and its properties:
- XOR of a number with itself:
a XOR a = 0
- XOR with zero:
a XOR 0 = a
- Commutative property:
a XOR b = b XOR a
- Associative property:
a XOR (b XOR c) = (a XOR b) XOR c
These properties mean that when we XOR an even number of the same numbers, the result is 0
, and when we do it an odd number of times, we get the number itself.
Let's go over the implementation details based on the solution provided:
- We initialize a variable
ans
to0
. This variable will serve as the accumulator for the XOR operations. - We then check the length of
nums2
using the bitwise&
operator with1
to determine if it's odd (len(nums2) & 1
). The& 1
trick checks the least significant bit of a number, which represents its odd/even status (odd numbers have a least significant bit of1
, even numbers have a0
). - If
nums2
has an odd length, we iterate over each value innums1
and apply the XOR operation to ourans
variable. Due to the asymmetric nature of the required pairings (every element innums1
is paired with every element innums2
), the cumulative effect when the count is odd is that the numbers innums1
indeed contribute to the final result. - We do the same for
nums1
by checking if it has an odd length, iterating overnums2
, and updatingans
accordingly. - At this stage,
ans
will hold the bitwise XOR of all integers that would be innums3
, and it's returned as the solution.
In the implementation, no extra data structures are needed because the solution leverages the XOR operation's properties to avoid constructing the nums3
array. This approach is notably efficient in both time and space complexity, as it requires iterating over each array only once (O(n) where n is the length of the longer array) and uses only a constant amount of extra space for the ans
variable.
Another key aspect is the use of bitwise operations (^
for XOR and &
for AND), which are low-level operations that are generally very fast in execution compared to higher-level arithmetic or logic operations.
No complex patterns or algorithms are used; the simplicity of the approach comes from a deep understanding of the XOR operation, which makes it a very elegant solution.
Ready to land your dream job?
Unlock your dream job with a 2-minute evaluator for a personalized learning plan!
Start EvaluatorExample Walkthrough
Let's take two arrays nums1 = [5, 9]
and nums2 = [7, 11, 12]
to illustrate the solution approach.
- We start by initializing
ans
to0
. - We then check if the length of
nums2
is odd. Since it has 3 elements, which is odd, we proceed to the next step. - We iterate over each element in
nums1
and XOR it withans
.- After XORing
5
withans
(initially0
),ans
becomes5
(5 XOR 0 = 5
). - Next, we XOR
9
(the second element innums1
) withans
, resulting inans = 5 XOR 9 = 12
.
- After XORing
- We don't need to check the length of
nums1
because we already knownums2
has an odd length, and that's enough to determine that all elements ofnums1
should be part of the final XOR. Ifnums1
has an even length, XORing it with an even count ofnums2
would cancel out its elements.
At this point, we have ans = 12
, which is the cumulative XOR of array nums1
with each element in nums2
considering the odd-even pairing effect.
Since the implementation leverages the XOR operation's properties to avoid constructing nums3
, the calculation is direct and efficient. The odd-length check using len(nums2) & 1
ensures that we only iterate through nums1
or nums2
if necessary.
In this example, we're avoiding the unnecessary and memory-intensive task of generating all possible pairs and their XOR results by directly accumulating the XORs that would result from such pairs. Thus, applying the algorithm's insight provides us with an answer: the bitwise XOR of all the elements that would be in the virtual array nums3
is 12
.
Solution Implementation
1from typing import List
2
3class Solution:
4 def xor_all_nums(self, nums1: List[int], nums2: List[int]) -> int:
5 # Initialize the result of XOR operation to 0.
6 result_xor = 0
7
8 # If the length of nums2 is odd, XOR all elements in nums1 with result_xor.
9 if len(nums2) % 2:
10 for num in nums1:
11 result_xor ^= num
12
13 # If the length of nums1 is odd, XOR all elements in nums2 with result_xor.
14 if len(nums1) % 2:
15 for num in nums2:
16 result_xor ^= num
17
18 # Return the final result after performing all XOR operations.
19 return result_xor
20
1// A class to find a solution for the XOR problem
2class Solution {
3 // Method to calculate the XOR of all elements after performing XOR as if each element of nums1 is paired with all elements of nums2 and vice-versa
4 public int xorAllNums(int[] nums1, int[] nums2) {
5 int result = 0; // Initialize result to zero
6
7 // If the length of nums2 is odd, XOR result with all elements in nums1
8 // Because if nums2 has an odd number of elements, each element in nums1 will be represented an odd number of times when taking the XOR with all elements of nums2 and vice versa.
9 if (nums2.length % 2 == 1) {
10 for (int value : nums1) {
11 result ^= value;
12 }
13 }
14
15 // Likewise, if the length of nums1 is odd, XOR result with all elements in nums2
16 if (nums1.length % 2 == 1) {
17 for (int value : nums2) {
18 result ^= value;
19 }
20 }
21
22 return result; // Return the accumulated XOR result
23 }
24}
25
1#include <vector>
2
3class Solution {
4public:
5 // Function to calculate the XOR of all elements as if they were all combined
6 // Parameter nums1 is the first vector of integers
7 // Parameter nums2 is the second vector of integers
8 // Returns the XOR of all elements combined
9 int xorAllNums(vector<int>& nums1, vector<int>& nums2) {
10 int result = 0;
11
12 // If nums2 has an odd number of elements, XOR all elements of nums1
13 if (nums2.size() % 2 == 1) {
14 for (int num : nums1) {
15 result ^= num;
16 }
17 }
18
19 // If nums1 has an odd number of elements, XOR all elements of nums2
20 if (nums1.size() % 2 == 1) {
21 for (int num : nums2) {
22 result ^= num;
23 }
24 }
25
26 // Return the final result of the XOR operation
27 return result;
28 }
29};
30
1/**
2 * XOR all numbers from two arrays in a specific way.
3 *
4 * If one array has an odd length, XOR all numbers from the other array.
5 * If both arrays have odd lengths, XOR all numbers from both arrays.
6 *
7 * @param {number[]} nums1 - The first array of numbers.
8 * @param {number[]} nums2 - The second array of numbers.
9 * @return {number} - The resulting XOR from the above rule.
10 */
11function xorAllNums(nums1: number[], nums2: number[]): number {
12 // Initialize the answer variable to store the final result.
13 let result = 0;
14
15 // Check if the length of nums2 is odd.
16 // If it is, accumulate the XOR of all elements in nums1 with the result.
17 if (nums2.length % 2 !== 0) {
18 result ^= nums1.reduce((accumulator, currentValue) => accumulator ^ currentValue, 0);
19 }
20
21 // Check if the length of nums1 is odd.
22 // If it is, accumulate the XOR of all elements in nums2 with the result.
23 if (nums1.length % 2 !== 0) {
24 result ^= nums2.reduce((accumulator, currentValue) => accumulator ^ currentValue, 0);
25 }
26
27 // Return the final XOR result.
28 return result;
29}
30
Time and Space Complexity
Time Complexity
The time complexity of the provided code depends on the lengths of the input lists nums1
and nums2
.
-
Checking
if len(nums2) & 1
: This is anO(1)
operation as it involves checking the parity of the length ofnums2
. -
Iterating over
nums1
: If the length ofnums2
is odd, we iterate over all elements innums1
, resulting inO(n)
complexity wheren
is the length ofnums1
. -
Checking
if len(nums1) & 1
: This is anotherO(1)
operation similar to the first check but fornums1
. -
Iterating over
nums2
: If the length ofnums1
is odd, we iterate over all elements innums2
, resulting inO(m)
complexity wherem
is the length ofnums2
.
Combining these operations, in the worst case, both nums1
and nums2
lengths are odd, which results in iterating over both lists. Hence, the total time complexity is O(n + m)
.
Space Complexity
The space complexity is related to the amount of extra space required that is not part of the input. For the given code, we only use an extra variable ans
to store the intermediate results of the XOR operation, regardless of the input size.
The space complexity is thus O(1)
because the space used does not scale with the size of the input.
Learn more about how to find time and space complexity quickly using problem constraints.
Which of the following is a good use case for backtracking?
Recommended Readings
LeetCode Patterns Your Personal Dijkstra's Algorithm to Landing Your Dream Job The goal of AlgoMonster is to help you get a job in the shortest amount of time possible in a data driven way We compiled datasets of tech interview problems and broke them down by patterns This way we
Recursion Recursion is one of the most important concepts in computer science Simply speaking recursion is the process of a function calling itself Using a real life analogy imagine a scenario where you invite your friends to lunch https algomonster s3 us east 2 amazonaws com recursion jpg You first
Runtime Overview When learning about algorithms and data structures you'll frequently encounter the term time complexity This concept is fundamental in computer science and offers insights into how long an algorithm takes to complete given a certain input size What is Time Complexity Time complexity represents the amount of time
Want a Structured Path to Master System Design Too? Don’t Miss This!