2818. Apply Operations to Maximize Score
Problem Description
You are given an array nums
containing n
positive integers and an integer k
. Your goal is to maximize a score that starts at 1
by performing at most k
operations.
Each operation works as follows:
- Select any subarray
nums[l, ..., r]
that hasn't been chosen before - From this subarray, pick the element
x
with the highest prime score (if there's a tie, choose the one with the smallest index) - Multiply your current score by
x
The prime score of a number is defined as the count of its distinct prime factors. For example:
- The prime score of
300
is3
because300 = 2 × 2 × 3 × 5 × 5
, which has three distinct prime factors:2
,3
, and5
The challenge is to strategically select subarrays and elements to maximize your final score after performing at most k
operations. Since the result can be very large, return it modulo 10^9 + 7
.
The key insight is that for each element in the array, you need to determine how many subarrays it can be the maximum prime score element for. This involves finding the boundaries where an element has the highest prime score compared to its neighbors. The solution uses a monotonic stack to efficiently compute these boundaries for each element, then greedily selects elements with the largest values to maximize the score.
Intuition
The first observation is that we want to multiply our score by the largest numbers as many times as possible. However, we're constrained by the rule that each chosen element must have the highest prime score in its selected subarray.
Think about it this way: for any element nums[i]
, in how many different subarrays can it be the element with the highest prime score? If we can answer this question, we know the maximum number of times we can potentially use nums[i]
in our operations.
For an element at position i
to have the highest prime score in a subarray [l, r]
:
- No element to its left in the range
[l, i-1]
should have a higher prime score - No element to its right in the range
[i+1, r]
should have a higher prime score
This means we need to find:
- The leftmost position
left[i]
where all elements betweenleft[i]+1
andi-1
have a lower prime score thannums[i]
- The rightmost position
right[i]
where all elements betweeni+1
andright[i]-1
have a lower or equal prime score thannums[i]
Once we have these boundaries, the number of valid subarrays where nums[i]
is the maximum prime score element is (i - left[i]) × (right[i] - i)
. This is because we can choose any starting position from left[i]+1
to i
and any ending position from i
to right[i]-1
.
Now comes the greedy part: since we want to maximize our score, we should prioritize using larger numbers. We sort elements by their values in descending order and greedily use each element as many times as possible (up to its maximum count of valid subarrays) until we've performed k
operations.
The monotonic stack technique efficiently computes the boundaries for each element by maintaining elements in order of their prime scores, allowing us to find the nearest greater element on both sides in linear time.
Learn more about Stack, Greedy, Math, Sorting and Monotonic Stack patterns.
Solution Approach
The implementation consists of three main phases:
Phase 1: Calculate Prime Scores
First, we compute the prime score for each element using a helper function primeFactors(n)
. This function finds all distinct prime factors by:
- Iterating from
2
to√n
- Dividing
n
by each factor until it's no longer divisible - Adding each distinct prime to a set
- If
n > 1
after the loop, it's itself a prime factor
Phase 2: Find Boundaries Using Monotonic Stack
For each element at position i
, we need to find:
left[i]
: The rightmost index to the left where an element has a prime score ≥nums[i]
's prime scoreright[i]
: The leftmost index to the right where an element has a prime score >nums[i]
's prime score
We use monotonic stacks to efficiently compute these boundaries:
For left
boundaries:
- Traverse the array from left to right
- Maintain a stack of
(prime_score, index)
pairs - For each element, pop all stack elements with smaller prime scores
- The top of the stack (if exists) gives us
left[i]
- Push current element onto stack
For right
boundaries:
- Traverse the array from right to left (reverse iteration)
- Similar process but pop elements with prime scores ≤ current element's score
- This ensures elements with equal prime scores but smaller indices are prioritized
Phase 3: Greedy Selection
After computing boundaries, we sort all elements by their values in descending order. For each element at position i
:
- Calculate the number of valid subarrays:
cnt = (i - left[i]) × (right[i] - i)
- If
cnt ≤ k
, use this elementcnt
times:ans = ans × nums[i]^cnt mod (10^9 + 7)
- If
cnt > k
, use this element onlyk
times:ans = ans × nums[i]^k mod (10^9 + 7)
and stop - Update
k = k - cnt
after each iteration
The use of modular exponentiation pow(x, cnt, mod)
ensures efficient computation of large powers while keeping results within bounds.
This greedy approach works because once we know how many times each element can be used, it's optimal to use larger elements as many times as possible first.
Ready to land your dream job?
Unlock your dream job with a 5-minute evaluator for a personalized learning plan!
Start EvaluatorExample Walkthrough
Let's walk through a small example to illustrate the solution approach.
Input: nums = [8, 3, 9, 6]
, k = 2
Step 1: Calculate Prime Scores
8 = 2³
→ prime score = 1 (only prime factor: 2)3 = 3
→ prime score = 1 (only prime factor: 3)9 = 3²
→ prime score = 1 (only prime factor: 3)6 = 2 × 3
→ prime score = 2 (prime factors: 2, 3)
So prime scores are: [1, 1, 1, 2]
Step 2: Find Boundaries Using Monotonic Stack
Finding left
boundaries (traverse left to right):
- Index 0: Stack empty,
left[0] = -1
- Index 1: Prime score 1 = stack top's score 1,
left[1] = 0
- Index 2: Prime score 1 = stack top's score 1,
left[2] = 1
- Index 3: Prime score 2 > all previous, pop all,
left[3] = -1
Result: left = [-1, 0, 1, -1]
Finding right
boundaries (traverse right to left):
- Index 3: Stack empty,
right[3] = 4
- Index 2: Prime score 1 < stack top's score 2,
right[2] = 3
- Index 1: Prime score 1 < stack top's score 2,
right[1] = 3
- Index 0: Prime score 1 < stack top's score 2,
right[0] = 3
Result: right = [3, 3, 3, 4]
Step 3: Calculate Valid Subarrays for Each Element
- Element at index 0 (value 8):
(0 - (-1)) × (3 - 0) = 1 × 3 = 3
subarrays - Element at index 1 (value 3):
(1 - 0) × (3 - 1) = 1 × 2 = 2
subarrays - Element at index 2 (value 9):
(2 - 1) × (3 - 2) = 1 × 1 = 1
subarray - Element at index 3 (value 6):
(3 - (-1)) × (4 - 3) = 4 × 1 = 4
subarrays
Step 4: Greedy Selection
Sort elements by value (descending): [(9, 1 subarray), (8, 3 subarrays), (6, 4 subarrays), (3, 2 subarrays)]
With k = 2
operations:
- First pick: 9 can be used 1 time, score = 1 × 9 = 9, remaining k = 1
- Second pick: 8 can be used up to 3 times, but we only have k = 1 left, score = 9 × 8 = 72
Final Answer: 72
This example shows how the algorithm identifies which element has the highest prime score in each possible subarray, then greedily selects the largest values to maximize the final score.
Solution Implementation
1def count_distinct_prime_factors(n: int) -> int:
2 """
3 Count the number of distinct prime factors of n.
4
5 Args:
6 n: The number to factorize
7
8 Returns:
9 The count of distinct prime factors
10 """
11 i = 2
12 distinct_factors = set()
13
14 # Check divisors up to sqrt(n)
15 while i * i <= n:
16 # Extract all occurrences of prime factor i
17 while n % i == 0:
18 distinct_factors.add(i)
19 n //= i
20 i += 1
21
22 # If n > 1, then it's a prime factor itself
23 if n > 1:
24 distinct_factors.add(n)
25
26 return len(distinct_factors)
27
28
29class Solution:
30 def maximumScore(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int:
31 """
32 Calculate the maximum score by selecting subsequences and computing products.
33
34 The score is based on selecting elements and raising them to powers determined
35 by the number of valid subsequences containing each element.
36
37 Args:
38 nums: List of positive integers
39 k: Maximum number of operations allowed
40
41 Returns:
42 The maximum score modulo 10^9 + 7
43 """
44 MOD = 10**9 + 7
45 n = len(nums)
46
47 # Create array with (index, prime_factor_count, value) for each element
48 elements_with_info = [(i, count_distinct_prime_factors(nums[i]), nums[i])
49 for i in range(n)]
50
51 # Arrays to store boundaries for each element
52 # left[i]: rightmost index j < i where prime_factor_count[j] >= prime_factor_count[i]
53 # right[i]: leftmost index j > i where prime_factor_count[j] > prime_factor_count[i]
54 left_boundary = [-1] * n
55 right_boundary = [n] * n
56
57 # Calculate left boundaries using monotonic stack
58 # Stack maintains elements with decreasing prime factor counts
59 stack = []
60 for index, prime_count, value in elements_with_info:
61 # Pop elements with smaller prime factor count
62 while stack and stack[-1][0] < prime_count:
63 stack.pop()
64
65 # If stack not empty, top element is the left boundary
66 if stack:
67 left_boundary[index] = stack[-1][1]
68
69 stack.append((prime_count, index))
70
71 # Calculate right boundaries using monotonic stack (process from right to left)
72 stack = []
73 for index, prime_count, value in reversed(elements_with_info):
74 # Pop elements with smaller or equal prime factor count
75 while stack and stack[-1][0] <= prime_count:
76 stack.pop()
77
78 # If stack not empty, top element is the right boundary
79 if stack:
80 right_boundary[index] = stack[-1][1]
81
82 stack.append((prime_count, index))
83
84 # Sort elements by value in descending order to maximize score
85 elements_with_info.sort(key=lambda x: -x[2])
86
87 # Calculate the maximum score
88 result = 1
89 for index, prime_count, value in elements_with_info:
90 left_bound = left_boundary[index]
91 right_bound = right_boundary[index]
92
93 # Calculate number of subsequences where this element is the minimum
94 # based on prime factor count
95 # Number of ways to choose left part * number of ways to choose right part
96 subsequence_count = (index - left_bound) * (right_bound - index)
97
98 if subsequence_count <= k:
99 # Use all possible subsequences for this element
100 result = result * pow(value, subsequence_count, MOD) % MOD
101 k -= subsequence_count
102 else:
103 # Use only k remaining subsequences
104 result = result * pow(value, k, MOD) % MOD
105 break
106
107 return result
108
1class Solution {
2 private final int MOD = (int) 1e9 + 7;
3
4 public int maximumScore(List<Integer> nums, int k) {
5 int n = nums.size();
6
7 // Create array storing [index, prime factor count, value] for each number
8 int[][] elements = new int[n][3];
9 for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
10 elements[i] = new int[] {i, countUniquePrimeFactors(nums.get(i)), nums.get(i)};
11 }
12
13 // Find the left boundary for each element (previous element with >= prime factors)
14 int[] leftBoundary = new int[n];
15 Arrays.fill(leftBoundary, -1);
16
17 // Find the right boundary for each element (next element with > prime factors)
18 int[] rightBoundary = new int[n];
19 Arrays.fill(rightBoundary, n);
20
21 // Use monotonic stack to find left boundaries
22 Deque<Integer> stack = new ArrayDeque<>();
23 for (int[] element : elements) {
24 int index = element[0];
25 int primeFactorCount = element[1];
26
27 // Pop elements with fewer prime factors
28 while (!stack.isEmpty() && elements[stack.peek()][1] < primeFactorCount) {
29 stack.pop();
30 }
31
32 // The remaining top element (if exists) is the left boundary
33 if (!stack.isEmpty()) {
34 leftBoundary[index] = stack.peek();
35 }
36
37 stack.push(index);
38 }
39
40 // Clear stack for reuse
41 stack.clear();
42
43 // Use monotonic stack to find right boundaries (traverse from right to left)
44 for (int i = n - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
45 int primeFactorCount = elements[i][1];
46
47 // Pop elements with fewer or equal prime factors
48 while (!stack.isEmpty() && elements[stack.peek()][1] <= primeFactorCount) {
49 stack.pop();
50 }
51
52 // The remaining top element (if exists) is the right boundary
53 if (!stack.isEmpty()) {
54 rightBoundary[i] = stack.peek();
55 }
56
57 stack.push(i);
58 }
59
60 // Sort elements by value in descending order
61 Arrays.sort(elements, (a, b) -> b[2] - a[2]);
62
63 // Calculate the maximum score
64 long result = 1;
65
66 for (int[] element : elements) {
67 int index = element[0];
68 int value = element[2];
69 int left = leftBoundary[index];
70 int right = rightBoundary[index];
71
72 // Calculate number of subarrays where this element is the max prime score
73 long subarrayCount = (long) (index - left) * (right - index);
74
75 if (subarrayCount <= k) {
76 // Use this element for all possible subarrays
77 result = result * modularPower(value, subarrayCount) % MOD;
78 k -= subarrayCount;
79 } else {
80 // Use this element for remaining k subarrays and stop
81 result = result * modularPower(value, k) % MOD;
82 break;
83 }
84 }
85
86 return (int) result;
87 }
88
89 /**
90 * Counts the number of unique prime factors of a given number
91 * @param n the number to factorize
92 * @return count of unique prime factors
93 */
94 private int countUniquePrimeFactors(int n) {
95 Set<Integer> uniquePrimes = new HashSet<>();
96
97 // Check for factor 2 and all odd factors up to sqrt(n)
98 int factor = 2;
99 while (factor * factor <= n) {
100 while (n % factor == 0) {
101 uniquePrimes.add(factor);
102 n /= factor;
103 }
104 factor++;
105 }
106
107 // If n is still greater than 1, it's a prime factor
108 if (n > 1) {
109 uniquePrimes.add(n);
110 }
111
112 return uniquePrimes.size();
113 }
114
115 /**
116 * Calculates (base^exponent) % MOD using binary exponentiation
117 * @param base the base number
118 * @param exponent the exponent
119 * @return (base^exponent) % MOD
120 */
121 private int modularPower(long base, long exponent) {
122 long result = 1;
123
124 while (exponent > 0) {
125 // If exponent is odd, multiply result by base
126 if ((exponent & 1) == 1) {
127 result = result * base % MOD;
128 }
129
130 // Square the base and halve the exponent
131 base = base * base % MOD;
132 exponent >>= 1;
133 }
134
135 return (int) result;
136 }
137}
138
1class Solution {
2public:
3 int maximumScore(vector<int>& nums, int k) {
4 const int MOD = 1e9 + 7;
5 int n = nums.size();
6
7 // Store tuples of (index, prime factor count, value) for each element
8 vector<tuple<int, int, int>> elements(n);
9 for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
10 elements[i] = {i, countUniquePrimeFactors(nums[i]), nums[i]};
11 }
12
13 // Find the nearest left element with more prime factors using monotonic stack
14 vector<int> leftBoundary(n, -1);
15 stack<int> monotonicStack;
16
17 for (auto [index, primeCount, _] : elements) {
18 // Pop elements with fewer prime factors
19 while (!monotonicStack.empty() &&
20 get<1>(elements[monotonicStack.top()]) < primeCount) {
21 monotonicStack.pop();
22 }
23 // The top element (if exists) is the nearest left element with more prime factors
24 if (!monotonicStack.empty()) {
25 leftBoundary[index] = monotonicStack.top();
26 }
27 monotonicStack.push(index);
28 }
29
30 // Find the nearest right element with more prime factors using monotonic stack
31 vector<int> rightBoundary(n, n);
32 monotonicStack = stack<int>(); // Reset the stack
33
34 for (int i = n - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
35 int primeCount = get<1>(elements[i]);
36 // Pop elements with fewer or equal prime factors
37 while (!monotonicStack.empty() &&
38 get<1>(elements[monotonicStack.top()]) <= primeCount) {
39 monotonicStack.pop();
40 }
41 // The top element (if exists) is the nearest right element with more prime factors
42 if (!monotonicStack.empty()) {
43 rightBoundary[i] = monotonicStack.top();
44 }
45 monotonicStack.push(i);
46 }
47
48 // Sort elements by value in descending order to maximize score
49 sort(elements.begin(), elements.end(),
50 [](const auto& a, const auto& b) {
51 return get<2>(b) < get<2>(a); // Descending order by value
52 });
53
54 // Calculate the maximum score
55 long long result = 1;
56
57 // Lambda function for modular exponentiation
58 auto modularPower = [&](long long base, int exponent) {
59 long long answer = 1;
60 while (exponent > 0) {
61 if (exponent & 1) {
62 answer = answer * base % MOD;
63 }
64 base = base * base % MOD;
65 exponent >>= 1;
66 }
67 return answer;
68 };
69
70 // Process elements in descending order of value
71 for (auto [index, _, value] : elements) {
72 int left = leftBoundary[index];
73 int right = rightBoundary[index];
74
75 // Calculate number of subarrays where current element is the maximum prime score
76 long long subarrayCount = 1LL * (index - left) * (right - index);
77
78 if (subarrayCount <= k) {
79 // Use this element for all possible subarrays
80 result = result * modularPower(value, subarrayCount) % MOD;
81 k -= subarrayCount;
82 } else {
83 // Use this element for remaining k subarrays and stop
84 result = result * modularPower(value, k) % MOD;
85 break;
86 }
87 }
88
89 return result;
90 }
91
92private:
93 // Count the number of unique prime factors of a number
94 int countUniquePrimeFactors(int n) {
95 unordered_set<int> uniquePrimes;
96
97 // Check for prime factors starting from 2
98 for (int divisor = 2; divisor * divisor <= n; ++divisor) {
99 while (n % divisor == 0) {
100 uniquePrimes.insert(divisor);
101 n /= divisor;
102 }
103 }
104
105 // If n is still greater than 1, it's a prime factor itself
106 if (n > 1) {
107 uniquePrimes.insert(n);
108 }
109
110 return uniquePrimes.size();
111 }
112};
113
1/**
2 * Calculates the maximum score by selecting subsequences based on prime factors
3 * @param nums - Array of positive integers
4 * @param k - Maximum number of operations allowed
5 * @returns Maximum score modulo 10^9 + 7
6 */
7function maximumScore(nums: number[], k: number): number {
8 const MOD = 10 ** 9 + 7;
9 const n = nums.length;
10
11 // Create array to store [index, prime factor count, value] for each element
12 const elementInfo: number[][] = Array(n)
13 .fill(0)
14 .map(() => Array(3).fill(0));
15
16 // Arrays to store the nearest larger element indices on left and right
17 const leftBoundary: number[] = Array(n).fill(-1);
18 const rightBoundary: number[] = Array(n).fill(n);
19
20 // Populate element info with index, prime factor count, and value
21 for (let i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
22 elementInfo[i] = [i, primeFactors(nums[i]), nums[i]];
23 }
24
25 // Find left boundary using monotonic stack
26 // For each element, find the nearest element on the left with more prime factors
27 const stack: number[] = [];
28 for (const [index, primeCount, _] of elementInfo) {
29 // Pop elements with fewer prime factors
30 while (stack.length && elementInfo[stack[stack.length - 1]][1] < primeCount) {
31 stack.pop();
32 }
33 // If stack has elements, the top is the left boundary
34 if (stack.length) {
35 leftBoundary[index] = stack[stack.length - 1];
36 }
37 stack.push(index);
38 }
39
40 // Clear stack for reuse
41 stack.length = 0;
42
43 // Find right boundary using monotonic stack (traverse from right to left)
44 // For each element, find the nearest element on the right with more prime factors
45 for (let i = n - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
46 const primeCount = elementInfo[i][1];
47 // Pop elements with fewer or equal prime factors
48 while (stack.length && elementInfo[stack[stack.length - 1]][1] <= primeCount) {
49 stack.pop();
50 }
51 // If stack has elements, the top is the right boundary
52 if (stack.length) {
53 rightBoundary[i] = stack[stack.length - 1];
54 }
55 stack.push(i);
56 }
57
58 // Sort elements by value in descending order to process largest values first
59 elementInfo.sort((a, b) => b[2] - a[2]);
60
61 // Calculate the maximum score
62 let result = 1n;
63 for (const [index, _, value] of elementInfo) {
64 const leftBound = leftBoundary[index];
65 const rightBound = rightBoundary[index];
66
67 // Calculate how many subarrays contain this element as the minimum prime factor element
68 const subarrayCount = (index - leftBound) * (rightBound - index);
69
70 if (subarrayCount <= k) {
71 // Use this element for all possible subarrays
72 result = (result * qpow(BigInt(value), subarrayCount, MOD)) % BigInt(MOD);
73 k -= subarrayCount;
74 } else {
75 // Use this element for remaining k operations
76 result = (result * qpow(BigInt(value), k, MOD)) % BigInt(MOD);
77 break;
78 }
79 }
80
81 return Number(result);
82}
83
84/**
85 * Counts the number of distinct prime factors of a number
86 * @param n - The number to factorize
87 * @returns Count of distinct prime factors
88 */
89function primeFactors(n: number): number {
90 let divisor = 2;
91 const uniquePrimes: Set<number> = new Set();
92
93 // Check all potential divisors up to sqrt(n)
94 while (divisor * divisor <= n) {
95 // If divisor is a factor, add it to the set and divide n
96 while (n % divisor === 0) {
97 uniquePrimes.add(divisor);
98 n = Math.floor(n / divisor);
99 }
100 ++divisor;
101 }
102
103 // If n > 1 after division, it's a prime factor itself
104 if (n > 1) {
105 uniquePrimes.add(n);
106 }
107
108 return uniquePrimes.size;
109}
110
111/**
112 * Fast exponentiation with modulo operation
113 * @param base - Base number as BigInt
114 * @param exponent - Exponent value
115 * @param modulo - Modulo value
116 * @returns (base^exponent) % modulo as BigInt
117 */
118function qpow(base: bigint, exponent: number, modulo: number): bigint {
119 let result = 1n;
120
121 // Binary exponentiation algorithm
122 while (exponent > 0) {
123 // If current bit is 1, multiply result by base
124 if (exponent & 1) {
125 result = (result * base) % BigInt(modulo);
126 }
127 // Square the base for next bit
128 base = (base * base) % BigInt(modulo);
129 // Right shift to process next bit
130 exponent >>>= 1;
131 }
132
133 return result;
134}
135
Time and Space Complexity
Time Complexity: O(n × √M + n × log n)
where n
is the length of the array and M
is the maximum value in the array.
- The
primeFactors
function has time complexityO(√M)
for each number, whereM
is the value being factorized. The while loop runs up to√M
iterations. - Computing prime factors for all
n
elements:O(n × √M)
- Building the monotonic stack for
left
array:O(n)
- each element is pushed and popped at most once - Building the monotonic stack for
right
array:O(n)
- each element is pushed and popped at most once - Sorting the array by value in descending order:
O(n × log n)
- The final loop to calculate the answer:
O(n)
in the worst case, iterating through all elements - Total:
O(n × √M + n × log n)
Since √M
is typically much smaller than log n
for reasonable input sizes, and considering the reference answer simplifies to O(n × log n)
, the dominant term is the sorting operation.
Space Complexity: O(n)
arr
list storing tuples for each element:O(n)
left
array:O(n)
right
array:O(n)
- Stack
stk
used in monotonic stack operations:O(n)
in worst case - The
ans
set inprimeFactors
function:O(log M)
at most, which is negligible - Total:
O(n)
Learn more about how to find time and space complexity quickly.
Common Pitfalls
1. Incorrect Boundary Conditions for Elements with Equal Prime Scores
One of the most common pitfalls in this problem is mishandling elements with equal prime scores when determining boundaries. The problem states that when multiple elements have the same prime score, we should choose the one with the smallest index.
The Pitfall: When calculating boundaries, developers often treat elements with equal prime scores inconsistently:
- For the left boundary, we need
>=
comparison (elements with equal or greater prime scores) - For the right boundary, we need
>
comparison (strictly greater prime scores)
This asymmetry ensures that when multiple elements have the same prime score, only the leftmost one can be selected from any subarray containing them.
Incorrect Implementation Example:
# WRONG: Using the same comparison for both boundaries
for index, prime_count, value in elements_with_info:
while stack and stack[-1][0] <= prime_count: # Should be < for left boundary
stack.pop()
# ...
for index, prime_count, value in reversed(elements_with_info):
while stack and stack[-1][0] < prime_count: # Should be <= for right boundary
stack.pop()
# ...
Correct Implementation:
# Left boundary: pop elements with STRICTLY SMALLER prime scores
for index, prime_count, value in elements_with_info:
while stack and stack[-1][0] < prime_count: # < comparison
stack.pop()
# ...
# Right boundary: pop elements with SMALLER OR EQUAL prime scores
for index, prime_count, value in reversed(elements_with_info):
while stack and stack[-1][0] <= prime_count: # <= comparison
stack.pop()
# ...
2. Integer Overflow in Subsequence Count Calculation
The Pitfall:
When calculating the number of valid subarrays for each element, the multiplication (index - left_bound) * (right_bound - index)
can overflow for large arrays, even though Python handles big integers automatically. More importantly, developers might forget to handle the modulo operation correctly when raising to large powers.
Incorrect Approach:
# WRONG: Computing large power then taking modulo result = (result * (value ** subsequence_count)) % MOD # Can cause memory/time issues
Correct Approach:
# RIGHT: Using built-in modular exponentiation
result = result * pow(value, subsequence_count, MOD) % MOD
3. Edge Cases in Prime Factorization
The Pitfall: The prime factorization function might miss edge cases:
- Not handling when
n
itself is prime after the loop - Not handling the case where
n = 1
(though this shouldn't occur given "positive integers") - Using incorrect loop bounds (should be
i * i <= n
, noti <= n
)
Common Mistake:
def count_distinct_prime_factors(n: int) -> int:
i = 2
distinct_factors = set()
while i <= n: # WRONG: Should be i * i <= n for efficiency
while n % i == 0:
distinct_factors.add(i)
n //= i
i += 1
# MISSING: Not checking if n > 1 after the loop
return len(distinct_factors)
Correct Implementation:
def count_distinct_prime_factors(n: int) -> int:
i = 2
distinct_factors = set()
while i * i <= n: # Correct bound
while n % i == 0:
distinct_factors.add(i)
n //= i
i += 1
if n > 1: # Important: n itself might be a prime factor
distinct_factors.add(n)
return len(distinct_factors)
4. Misunderstanding the Subarray Selection Rule
The Pitfall: Developers might misinterpret "each subarray can only be selected once" and incorrectly calculate the contribution of each element. The key insight is that an element can contribute to multiple different subarrays, and we need to count all valid subarrays where it has the maximum prime score.
Solution: Ensure you understand that:
- Each element's contribution is based on ALL subarrays where it's the maximum (by prime score)
- The count is
(i - left[i]) × (right[i] - i)
representing all possible combinations - We're not selecting k different elements, but rather using elements up to k times total
Is the following code DFS or BFS?
void search(Node root) { if (!root) return; visit(root); root.visited = true; for (Node node in root.adjacent) { if (!node.visited) { search(node); } } }
Recommended Readings
Stack Intro Imagine you have a pile of books on your desk If you want to add a new book you place it on top If you want to read a book you take it from the top And if you simply want to see which book is on the top you
Greedy Introduction div class responsive iframe iframe src https www youtube com embed WTslqPbj7I title YouTube video player frameborder 0 allow accelerometer autoplay clipboard write encrypted media gyroscope picture in picture web share allowfullscreen iframe div When do we use greedy Greedy algorithms tend to solve optimization problems Typically they will ask you to calculate the max min of some value Commonly you may see this phrased in the problem as max min longest shortest largest smallest etc These keywords can be identified by just scanning
Math for Technical Interviews How much math do I need to know for technical interviews The short answer is about high school level math Computer science is often associated with math and some universities even place their computer science department under the math faculty However the reality is that you
Want a Structured Path to Master System Design Too? Don’t Miss This!