3066. Minimum Operations to Exceed Threshold Value II
Problem Description
You have an array of integers nums
(0-indexed) and an integer k
. Your goal is to make all elements in the array greater than or equal to k
through a series of operations.
In each operation, you can:
- Select the two smallest integers
x
andy
from the array - Remove both
x
andy
from the array - Calculate a new value using the formula:
min(x, y) * 2 + max(x, y)
- Insert this new value back into the array at any position
You can only perform an operation if the array contains at least 2 elements.
The task is to find the minimum number of operations needed to ensure every element in the array is greater than or equal to k
.
For example, if you have nums = [2, 11, 10, 1, 3]
and k = 10
:
- The two smallest elements are 1 and 2
- Remove them and insert
1 * 2 + 2 = 4
- Continue this process until all remaining elements are ≥ 10
The solution uses a min heap to efficiently track and extract the smallest elements. It repeatedly takes the two smallest values, combines them using the given formula, and puts the result back into the heap. This continues until either there's only one element left or the smallest element is already ≥ k
.
Intuition
The key insight is that we want to eliminate all elements smaller than k
while minimizing the number of operations. Since each operation combines two elements into one, we're essentially reducing the array size by one each time.
When we combine two numbers using the formula min(x, y) * 2 + max(x, y)
, the resulting value is always larger than both original values. This means we're gradually increasing the values in our array.
The greedy strategy emerges from observing that we should always combine the two smallest elements. Why? Because:
- We must eventually deal with all elements smaller than
k
- Combining the two smallest elements gives us the best chance of creating a value that's still manageable and won't unnecessarily inflate larger values
- If we combined a small element with a large element, we'd get an even larger result, which doesn't help us minimize operations
Since we repeatedly need to find and extract the two smallest elements, a min heap is the perfect data structure. It gives us O(log n)
access to the smallest element and maintains the sorted property as we add new combined values back.
The process naturally terminates when either:
- The smallest element in our heap is already
≥ k
(mission accomplished) - We only have one element left (can't perform more operations)
This greedy approach of always combining the two smallest elements guarantees the minimum number of operations because we're processing elements in the most efficient order - dealing with the problematic small values first while keeping the resulting values as small as possible.
Learn more about Heap (Priority Queue) patterns.
Solution Approach
The solution uses a min heap (priority queue) to efficiently manage the array elements and perform the required operations.
Step-by-step implementation:
-
Initialize the heap: Convert the input array
nums
into a min heap usingheapify(nums)
. This operation arranges the array so that the smallest element is always at index 0, and takesO(n)
time. -
Set up the counter: Initialize
ans = 0
to track the number of operations performed. -
Main loop: Continue operations while two conditions are met:
- The heap contains at least 2 elements (
len(nums) > 1
) - The smallest element is less than
k
(nums[0] < k
)
- The heap contains at least 2 elements (
-
Perform each operation:
- Extract the two smallest elements using
heappop(nums)
twice. Let's call themx
andy
- Calculate the new value: Since
x
is popped first, it's guaranteed to be≤ y
, so the formula simplifies tox * 2 + y
- Insert the new value back into the heap using
heappush(nums, x * 2 + y)
- Increment the operation counter:
ans += 1
- Extract the two smallest elements using
-
Return the result: Once the loop exits (either because all elements are
≥ k
or only one element remains), returnans
Time Complexity: O(n log n)
where n is the initial size of the array. In the worst case, we might need to perform operations on almost all elements, and each heap operation (pop and push) takes O(log n)
time.
Space Complexity: O(1)
as we're modifying the input array in-place (the heap is built on the original array).
The beauty of this approach is that the heap automatically maintains the order we need - we can always access the two smallest elements in O(log n)
time, making the greedy strategy efficient to implement.
Ready to land your dream job?
Unlock your dream job with a 5-minute evaluator for a personalized learning plan!
Start EvaluatorExample Walkthrough
Let's walk through a concrete example with nums = [1, 5, 3, 9]
and k = 7
.
Initial Setup:
- Convert array to min heap:
[1, 5, 3, 9]
(1 is at the root) - Operations counter:
ans = 0
Operation 1:
- Check conditions: heap has 4 elements (> 1) ✓, smallest element is 1 (< 7) ✓
- Extract two smallest:
x = 1
(first pop),y = 3
(second pop) - Heap after extraction:
[5, 9]
- Calculate new value:
1 * 2 + 3 = 5
- Insert back into heap:
[5, 9, 5]
→ heap rearranges to[5, 9, 5]
- Increment counter:
ans = 1
Operation 2:
- Check conditions: heap has 3 elements (> 1) ✓, smallest element is 5 (< 7) ✓
- Extract two smallest:
x = 5
(first pop),y = 5
(second pop) - Heap after extraction:
[9]
- Calculate new value:
5 * 2 + 5 = 15
- Insert back into heap:
[9, 15]
→ heap maintains[9, 15]
- Increment counter:
ans = 2
Loop Termination:
- Check conditions: heap has 2 elements (> 1) ✓, but smallest element is 9 (≥ 7) ✗
- Loop exits as all elements are now ≥ 7
Final Result: ans = 2
The array transformed from [1, 5, 3, 9]
to [9, 15]
in 2 operations, with all elements now greater than or equal to 7.
Solution Implementation
1from typing import List
2from heapq import heapify, heappop, heappush
3
4class Solution:
5 def minOperations(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int:
6 # Convert the list into a min-heap to efficiently access smallest elements
7 heapify(nums)
8
9 # Initialize operation counter
10 operations_count = 0
11
12 # Continue operations while there are at least 2 elements and the smallest is less than k
13 while len(nums) > 1 and nums[0] < k:
14 # Extract the two smallest elements from the heap
15 first_min = heappop(nums)
16 second_min = heappop(nums)
17
18 # Combine them using the formula: first_min * 2 + second_min
19 # and push the result back to the heap
20 combined_value = first_min * 2 + second_min
21 heappush(nums, combined_value)
22
23 # Increment the operation counter
24 operations_count += 1
25
26 # Return the total number of operations performed
27 return operations_count
28
1class Solution {
2 /**
3 * Finds the minimum number of operations needed to make all elements >= k.
4 * In each operation, we can remove the two smallest elements x and y,
5 * and add back the value (x * 2 + y).
6 *
7 * @param nums the input array of integers
8 * @param k the target minimum value
9 * @return the minimum number of operations required
10 */
11 public int minOperations(int[] nums, int k) {
12 // Use a min-heap to efficiently access the smallest elements
13 // Using Long to prevent potential overflow during calculations
14 PriorityQueue<Long> minHeap = new PriorityQueue<>();
15
16 // Add all numbers to the priority queue as Long values
17 for (int num : nums) {
18 minHeap.offer((long) num);
19 }
20
21 // Counter for the number of operations performed
22 int operationCount = 0;
23
24 // Continue operations while:
25 // 1. There are at least 2 elements to combine
26 // 2. The smallest element is still less than k
27 while (minHeap.size() > 1 && minHeap.peek() < k) {
28 // Remove the two smallest elements
29 long smallest = minHeap.poll();
30 long secondSmallest = minHeap.poll();
31
32 // Combine them using the formula: smallest * 2 + secondSmallest
33 // and add the result back to the heap
34 long combined = smallest * 2 + secondSmallest;
35 minHeap.offer(combined);
36
37 // Increment the operation counter
38 operationCount++;
39 }
40
41 return operationCount;
42 }
43}
44
1class Solution {
2public:
3 int minOperations(vector<int>& nums, int k) {
4 // Use long long to prevent integer overflow during calculations
5 using ll = long long;
6
7 // Min-heap to always access the smallest element efficiently
8 priority_queue<ll, vector<ll>, greater<ll>> minHeap;
9
10 // Add all numbers from the input array to the min-heap
11 for (int num : nums) {
12 minHeap.push(num);
13 }
14
15 // Counter for the number of operations performed
16 int operationCount = 0;
17
18 // Continue operations while:
19 // 1. There are at least 2 elements to combine
20 // 2. The smallest element is still less than k
21 while (minHeap.size() > 1 && minHeap.top() < k) {
22 // Extract the two smallest elements
23 ll smallest = minHeap.top();
24 minHeap.pop();
25 ll secondSmallest = minHeap.top();
26 minHeap.pop();
27
28 // Combine them using the formula: min * 2 + secondMin
29 // and add the result back to the heap
30 minHeap.push(smallest * 2 + secondSmallest);
31
32 // Increment the operation counter
33 operationCount++;
34 }
35
36 return operationCount;
37 }
38};
39
1// Min-heap implementation using array
2let heap: number[] = [];
3
4// Helper function to get parent index
5function getParentIndex(index: number): number {
6 return Math.floor((index - 1) / 2);
7}
8
9// Helper function to get left child index
10function getLeftChildIndex(index: number): number {
11 return 2 * index + 1;
12}
13
14// Helper function to get right child index
15function getRightChildIndex(index: number): number {
16 return 2 * index + 2;
17}
18
19// Helper function to swap two elements in the heap
20function swap(index1: number, index2: number): void {
21 const temp = heap[index1];
22 heap[index1] = heap[index2];
23 heap[index2] = temp;
24}
25
26// Bubble up operation to maintain heap property after insertion
27function bubbleUp(index: number): void {
28 while (index > 0) {
29 const parentIndex = getParentIndex(index);
30 if (heap[parentIndex] <= heap[index]) {
31 break;
32 }
33 swap(parentIndex, index);
34 index = parentIndex;
35 }
36}
37
38// Bubble down operation to maintain heap property after removal
39function bubbleDown(index: number): void {
40 while (true) {
41 let minIndex = index;
42 const leftChildIndex = getLeftChildIndex(index);
43 const rightChildIndex = getRightChildIndex(index);
44
45 // Check if left child exists and is smaller
46 if (leftChildIndex < heap.length && heap[leftChildIndex] < heap[minIndex]) {
47 minIndex = leftChildIndex;
48 }
49
50 // Check if right child exists and is smaller
51 if (rightChildIndex < heap.length && heap[rightChildIndex] < heap[minIndex]) {
52 minIndex = rightChildIndex;
53 }
54
55 // If current node is already the smallest, stop
56 if (minIndex === index) {
57 break;
58 }
59
60 swap(index, minIndex);
61 index = minIndex;
62 }
63}
64
65// Add element to the heap
66function enqueue(value: number): void {
67 heap.push(value);
68 bubbleUp(heap.length - 1);
69}
70
71// Remove and return the minimum element from the heap
72function dequeue(): number {
73 if (heap.length === 0) {
74 throw new Error("Heap is empty");
75 }
76
77 const minValue = heap[0];
78
79 // Move last element to root and remove last element
80 heap[0] = heap[heap.length - 1];
81 heap.pop();
82
83 // Restore heap property if heap is not empty
84 if (heap.length > 0) {
85 bubbleDown(0);
86 }
87
88 return minValue;
89}
90
91// Get the minimum element without removing it
92function front(): number {
93 if (heap.length === 0) {
94 throw new Error("Heap is empty");
95 }
96 return heap[0];
97}
98
99// Get the size of the heap
100function size(): number {
101 return heap.length;
102}
103
104/**
105 * Calculate minimum operations to make all elements >= k
106 * Operations: remove two smallest elements x and y, insert x * 2 + y
107 * @param nums - array of numbers to process
108 * @param k - target minimum value
109 * @returns minimum number of operations needed
110 */
111function minOperations(nums: number[], k: number): number {
112 // Initialize heap for new problem instance
113 heap = [];
114
115 // Add all numbers to the min-heap
116 for (const num of nums) {
117 enqueue(num);
118 }
119
120 // Counter for number of operations performed
121 let operationCount = 0;
122
123 // Continue operations while there are at least 2 elements and minimum element is less than k
124 while (size() > 1 && front() < k) {
125 // Remove two smallest elements
126 const firstMin = dequeue();
127 const secondMin = dequeue();
128
129 // Combine them according to the formula and add back to heap
130 const combined = firstMin * 2 + secondMin;
131 enqueue(combined);
132
133 // Increment operation counter
134 operationCount++;
135 }
136
137 return operationCount;
138}
139
Time and Space Complexity
Time Complexity: O(n × log n)
The initial heapify(nums)
operation takes O(n)
time to build a min-heap from the array. In the worst case, the while loop can run up to n-1
times (when we need to merge all elements into one). Each iteration performs:
- Two
heappop()
operations:O(log n)
each - One
heappush()
operation:O(log n)
Since each iteration has O(log n)
complexity and we can have up to O(n)
iterations, the overall time complexity is O(n × log n)
.
Space Complexity: O(n)
The space complexity is O(n)
where n
is the length of the array. The heapify()
operation modifies the input list in-place to create a heap structure, requiring O(1)
additional space. However, since we're considering the total space used including the input, the space complexity is O(n)
for storing the heap structure of the input array.
Learn more about how to find time and space complexity quickly.
Common Pitfalls
1. Not Checking if the Goal is Achievable
The most critical pitfall is assuming that it's always possible to make all elements ≥ k. If the array initially contains any element that equals 0, the goal becomes impossible to achieve.
Why this happens: When we have a 0 in the array, any operation involving it will produce:
0 * 2 + y = y
(if 0 is the smaller element)x * 2 + 0 = 2x
(if 0 is the larger element)
If we start with two zeros, we get 0 * 2 + 0 = 0
, creating an infinite loop where we can never increase the minimum value.
Solution:
def minOperations(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int:
# Check if any element is 0 and k > 0
if 0 in nums and k > 0:
return -1 # Impossible to achieve
heapify(nums)
operations_count = 0
while len(nums) > 1 and nums[0] < k:
first_min = heappop(nums)
second_min = heappop(nums)
combined_value = first_min * 2 + second_min
heappush(nums, combined_value)
operations_count += 1
# Final check: if we're left with one element less than k
if nums and nums[0] < k:
return -1 # Cannot achieve the goal
return operations_count
2. Modifying the Original Input Array
The solution modifies the input array directly by converting it into a heap. This can be problematic if the caller expects the original array to remain unchanged.
Solution:
def minOperations(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int:
# Create a copy to avoid modifying the original array
heap = nums.copy()
heapify(heap)
operations_count = 0
while len(heap) > 1 and heap[0] < k:
first_min = heappop(heap)
second_min = heappop(heap)
combined_value = first_min * 2 + second_min
heappush(heap, combined_value)
operations_count += 1
return operations_count
3. Integer Overflow in Other Languages
While Python handles arbitrary-precision integers automatically, implementing this solution in languages like Java or C++ could lead to integer overflow when repeatedly combining values.
Why this matters: The formula min * 2 + max
can grow quickly. After multiple operations, the combined values might exceed the maximum integer limit (e.g., 2^31 - 1 for 32-bit integers).
Solution for other languages:
- Use long or long long data types
- Add overflow checking
- Consider the maximum possible value after all operations
4. Assuming Elements are Already Sorted
Some might try to optimize by assuming the input is sorted or by sorting it first, then using indices instead of a heap. This approach fails because after each operation, the new combined value might not maintain the sorted order.
Wrong approach:
# This doesn't work correctly!
nums.sort()
operations = 0
while len(nums) > 1 and nums[0] < k:
new_val = nums[0] * 2 + nums[1]
nums = nums[2:] + [new_val] # Inefficient and incorrect
nums.sort() # O(n log n) per operation!
operations += 1
The heap-based solution is correct because it efficiently maintains the min-heap property after each insertion, ensuring we always get the true two smallest elements.
You are given an array of intervals where intervals[i] = [start_i, end_i]
represent the start and end of the ith
interval. You need to merge all overlapping intervals and return an array of the non-overlapping intervals that cover all the intervals in the input.
Recommended Readings
https assets algo monster cover_photos heap svg Priority Queue and Heap What is the relationship between priority queue and heap Priority Queue is an Abstract Data Type and Heap is the concrete data structure we use to implement a priority queue Priority Queue A priority queue is a data structure
Coding Interview Patterns Your Personal Dijkstra's Algorithm to Landing Your Dream Job The goal of AlgoMonster is to help you get a job in the shortest amount of time possible in a data driven way We compiled datasets of tech interview problems and broke them down by patterns This way
Recursion Recursion is one of the most important concepts in computer science Simply speaking recursion is the process of a function calling itself Using a real life analogy imagine a scenario where you invite your friends to lunch https assets algo monster recursion jpg You first call Ben and ask
Want a Structured Path to Master System Design Too? Don’t Miss This!