1669. Merge In Between Linked Lists

Problem Description

In this problem, we are given two singly-linked lists called list1 and list2. The sizes of these lists are n and m respectively. The goal is to modify list1 by removing a segment of its nodes, specifically the nodes from the ath position to the bth position (assuming the first node is at position 0). Following the removal of this segment, list2 is then inserted into list1 at the cut point. In other words, list1 should be continued by list2 starting at the ath node, and after the last node of list2, the continuation should be the rest of list1 starting from the node right after the bth position. The task is to complete this operation and return the head of the updated list1.

To visualize, imagine list1 as a chain of nodes and we are to clip out a section of this chain from a to b, then attach a new chain (list2) in its place, and finally reattach the remaining part of the original list1 after list2.


To achieve the merge described in the problem, the solution involves a few key steps executed in sequence. The first step is to find the node just before the ath node in list1; let's call this the preA node. We also need to find the bth node itself because its next node is where we want to eventually connect the tail of list2. Let's refer to the bth node's next node as postB. To navigate to these nodes, we can start at the head of list1 and traverse it while counting the nodes until we reach the desired positions.

Once we have preA and postB, we disconnect the nodes from preA until postB, effectively removing the segmented list between a and b. Now preA's next node is set to the head of list2, linking the start of list2 to the front portion of list1.

Next, we traverse to the end of list2 since we need to connect the tail of list2 to the postB node. After reaching the end of list2, we set the next node to postB.

The merge is complete at this point, and we return the head of the modified list1. The essence of the solution is to splice the arrays by reassigning the next pointers of the nodes in list1, to incorporate the entirety of list2 and then reconnect list1.

Handling the node connections properly and ensuring no nodes are lost in the process are crucial parts of the solution.

Learn more about Linked List patterns.

Solution Approach

The merger of the two lists is achieved via a step-by-step approach:

  1. Initialize Pointers: We start by initializing two pointers p and q to the head of list1. These pointers will help us traverse the list.

  2. Find preA Node: The p pointer is used to find the node just before the ath position (the preA node). We use a simple loop that traverses the list a-1 times. The loop for _ in range(a - 1) moves the p pointer to the correct spot.

  3. Find postB Node: Similarly, the q pointer is aimed at finding the node at the bth position. Because we're already at the head of list1 (position 0), we only need to move b times to reach this node, hence the loop: for _ in range(b).

  4. Detach & Connect: The next pointer of p is then set to the head of list2, effectively detaching the list1 segment between a and b, and linking the beginning of list2 to list1.

  5. Traverse list2: Now, we need to find the end of list2. We continue to move p forward with the loop while p.next. When this loop exits, p is at the last node of list2.

  6. Reattach Remaining list1: The next pointer of the last node of list2 (now at p) is connected to q.next, which is the node immediately following the bth node in list1 (the postB node). This is done with p.next = q.next.

  7. Complete and Return: The q.next is then pointed to None to detach the removed segment from the rest of the list, which is a good practice to avoid potential memory leaks in some environments. Finally, the head of the modified list (which is still list1) is returned.

Here's a breakdown of key patterns used:

  • Two-pointer technique: Used to locate the nodes before and after the removed segment.
  • Traversal: An essential operation for navigating linked lists.
  • Link manipulation: The core logic revolves around correctly adjusting the next properties of the nodes to "stitch" the lists together.

This approach guarantees the merger without allocating new nodes, operating in-place within the given data structures. It also ensures we only traverse each list once, making the algorithm efficient with O(n + m) time complexity, where n and m are the lengths of list1 and list2, respectively.

Discover Your Strengths and Weaknesses: Take Our 2-Minute Quiz to Tailor Your Study Plan:

Which of the two traversal algorithms (BFS and DFS) can be used to find whether two nodes are connected?

Example Walkthrough

Let's illustrate the solution approach with a small example where list1 = 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 and list2 = 100 -> 101. Suppose we want to replace nodes in positions a = 1 to b = 2 of list1 with list2.

  1. Initialize Pointers: We start by setting p and q to the head of list1, which is the node with value 1.

  2. Find preA Node: We need to find the node just before the ath position (the preA node). We move p one step because a - 1 = 0. So, p now points to node 1.

  3. Find postB Node: To locate the postB node, we set q to the head of list1 and move it b steps. After moving 2 steps, q points to node 3.

  4. Detach & Connect: We set the next of node 1 (preA.next) to the head of list2 (node 100). Now list1 starts as 1 -> 100 -> 101.

  5. Traverse list2: We move p through list2 to the end. As list2 has two nodes, p will now point to node 101.

  6. Reattach Remaining list1: Set p.next (currently p is at 101 of list2) to q.next (q is at 3 of list1), so that list1 now is 1 -> 100 -> 101 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5.

  7. Complete and Return: Set q.next to None, detaching the removed segment (in this case, not needed as q.next already points to the correct segment). The head of list1 remains the first node with value 1, so we return list1.

Following this example, list1 will be transformed into 1 -> 100 -> 101 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 after the operation, which demonstrates the solution approach in action.

Solution Implementation

1class ListNode:
2    def __init__(self, val=0, next=None):
3        self.val = val
4        self.next = next
6class Solution:
7    def mergeInBetween(self, list1: ListNode, a: int, b: int, list2: ListNode) -> ListNode:
8        # Initialize two pointers to the head of list1
9        prev_node_of_sublist = curr_node = list1
11        # Move prev_node_of_sublist to the node just before position 'a'
12        for _ in range(a - 1):
13            prev_node_of_sublist = prev_node_of_sublist.next
15        # Move curr_node to the node at position 'b'
16        for _ in range(b):
17            curr_node = curr_node.next
19        # Connect the node before 'a' with the head of list2
20        prev_node_of_sublist.next = list2
22        # Traverse to the end of list2 to find the last node
23        while prev_node_of_sublist.next:
24            prev_node_of_sublist = prev_node_of_sublist.next
26        # Connect the last node of list2 with the node after 'b' in list1
27        prev_node_of_sublist.next = curr_node.next
29        # The node at position 'b' no longer has any references and can be collected by garbage collector
31        # Return the merged list starting with list1's head
32        return list1
2 * Definition for singly-linked list.
3 * public class ListNode {
4 *     int val;
5 *     ListNode next;
6 *     ListNode() {}
7 *     ListNode(int val) { this.val = val; }
8 *     ListNode(int val, ListNode next) { this.val = val; this.next = next; }
9 * }
10 */
11class Solution {
12    public ListNode mergeInBetween(ListNode list1, int a, int b, ListNode list2) {
13        // Initial pointers to help with node traversal.
14        ListNode beforeA = list1; // Pointer to the node just before position 'a'.
15        ListNode afterB = list1; // Pointer to the node just after position 'b'.
17        // Move the 'beforeA' pointer to the node just before the 'a' position.
18        for (int i = 0; i < a - 1; i++) {
19            beforeA = beforeA.next;
20        }
22        // Move the 'afterB' pointer to the node just after the 'b' position.
23        for (int i = 0; i < b; i++) {
24            afterB = afterB.next;
25        }
27        // Connect the 'beforeA' node to the start of list2.
28        beforeA.next = list2;
30        // Traverse list2 to the end.
31        ListNode endOfList2 = beforeA.next; // Start from the first node of list2
32        while (endOfList2.next != null) {
33            endOfList2 = endOfList2.next;
34        }
36        // Connect the end of list2 to the 'afterB' node, effectively skipping 'a' to 'b' in list1.
37        endOfList2.next = afterB.next;
39        // 'afterB.next' should be null to ensure we don't retain unwanted references.
40        afterB.next = null;
42        return list1; // Return the modified list1.
43    }
2 * Definition for singly-linked list.
3 * struct ListNode {
4 *     int val;
5 *     ListNode *next;
6 *     ListNode() : val(0), next(nullptr) {}
7 *     ListNode(int x) : val(x), next(nullptr) {}
8 *     ListNode(int x, ListNode *next) : val(x), next(next) {}
9 * };
10 */
12class Solution {
14    ListNode* mergeInBetween(ListNode* list1, int a, int b, ListNode* list2) {
15        // Pointers to manage the positions in list1
16        ListNode* prevNode = list1; // Pointer to track the node before the 'a' position
17        ListNode* nextNode = list1; // Pointer to track the node at the 'b' position
19        // Move the prevNode pointer to the node just before the node at position 'a'
20        for (int i = 1; i < a; ++i) {
21            prevNode = prevNode->next;
22        }
24        // Move the nextNode pointer to the node at position 'b'
25        for (int i = 0; i <= b; ++i) {
26            nextNode = nextNode->next;
27        }
29        // Attach the start of list2 to where 'a' was in list1
30        prevNode->next = list2;
32        // Traverse list2 until the end
33        while (prevNode->next) {
34            prevNode = prevNode->next;
35        }
37        // Connect the end of list2 to the node just after 'b' in list1
38        prevNode->next = nextNode;
40        // The next node of 'b' position is now isolated, and we do not need to set it to nullptr
42        // Return the modified list1 with list2 merged in between
43        return list1;
44    }
2 * Merges one linked list into another between the indices `a` and `b`. The nodes after `b`
3 * are reconnected to the end of `list2`.
4 * @param {ListNode | null} list1 - The first linked list.
5 * @param {number} a - The start index for the merge.
6 * @param {number} b - The end index for the merge.
7 * @param {ListNode | null} list2 - The second linked list to be merged.
8 * @returns {ListNode | null} - The merged linked list.
9 */
10function mergeInBetween(
11    list1: ListNode | null,
12    a: number,
13    b: number,
14    list2: ListNode | null
15): ListNode | null {
16    // `preMergeNode` will eventually point to the node just before 'a'.
17    let preMergeNode = list1;
18    // `postMergeNode` will eventually point to the node just after 'b'.
19    let postMergeNode = list1;
21    // Find the `(a-1)`th node, to connect list2 to its next.
22    while (--a > 0) {
23        preMergeNode = preMergeNode!.next;
24    }
26    // Find the `b`th node, which list2 will be connected before.
27    while (b-- > 0) {
28        postMergeNode = postMergeNode!.next;
29    }
31    // Connect list2 to the next of `preMergeNode`.
32    preMergeNode!.next = list2;
34    // Iterate to the last node of list2.
35    while (preMergeNode!.next) {
36        preMergeNode = preMergeNode!.next;
37    }
39    // Connect the last node of list2 to the node after `postMergeNode`.
40    preMergeNode!.next = postMergeNode!.next;
41    // Not necessary to nullify `postMergeNode.next` as it will not affect the resultant list.
42    return list1;

Time and Space Complexity

Time Complexity

The given code consists of a few steps. Here is the analysis of each:

  1. Advanced p pointer a - 1 times: The time complexity is O(a) because it requires one operation for each step until reaching the a-th node.

  2. Advanced q pointer b times: The time complexity is O(b) because it traverses the linked list from the start until reaching the b-th node.

  3. Connecting list1 to list2: The operation is constant time, O(1), since it's a matter of single assignments.

  4. Traversing list2 to find the end: In the worst case, list2 has n nodes, making this operation O(n), where n is the number of nodes in list2.

  5. Connecting the end of list2 to q.next: This is another constant time operation, O(1).

Adding these up, assuming n is the number of nodes in the second list and a and b are the positions in the first list, the overall time complexity would be O(a) + O(b) + O(n) + O(1) + O(1), which simplifies to O(a + b + n).

Space Complexity

The space complexity is O(1) because the code only uses a fixed number of pointers (p and q) and does not allocate extra space that grows with the size of the input.

Learn more about how to find time and space complexity quickly using problem constraints.

Fast Track Your Learning with Our Quick Skills Quiz:

Which data structure is used to implement recursion?

Recommended Readings

Got a question? Ask the Monster Assistant anything you don't understand.

Still not clear? Ask in the Forum,  Discord or Submit the part you don't understand to our editors.