2929. Distribute Candies Among Children II
Problem Description
You are given a task to distribute n
candies among 3
children. The goal is to figure out the total number of ways to do this. However, there's an additional constraint that must be considered: no child is allowed to receive more than limit
candies. The problem asks us to calculate all the possible distributions that respect this constraint.
At its core, this problem is about combinations and understanding the limits of distribution. It's similar to partitioning objects into groups with an upper bound on the group size. Imagining the candies as items to be placed in containers (one for each child), where a container can hold up to a certain number of items (the limit
), might help to visualize the problem.
Given these conditions, your task is to figure out how to count all permissible arrangements where each child can only have a certain maximum number of candies. This simple scenario is complicated by the upper cap of candies that a single child can receive.
Intuition
The intuition behind the solution relies on principles from combinatorial mathematics and the principle of inclusion-exclusion.
We start with the notion that distributing n
candies among 3
children is similar to deciding how to place n
indistinguishable balls into 3
distinguishable bins. Here, the candies are the balls, and each child represents a bin.
Initially, without considering the limit
, we can calculate the number of ways by adding 2 virtual balls (or placeholders for the partitions) to the n
candies. This transforms the problem into one of placing partitions between balls, which is a common combinatorial approach. The placements of these partitions split the n
candies into 3 groups, representing the share for each child. The formula for this would be combinations of n + 2
taken 2
at a time (C(n + 2, 2)
).
However, this method counts distributions where a child might get more than the limit
. Thus, we must exclude these possibilities. For each child, if they get more than the limit
, the possible distributions for the remaining candies, including the virtual ones, diminish. Here we subtract the combinations where one of the children has exceeded the limit (3 * C(n - limit + 1, 2)
).
The inclusion-exclusion principle comes into play when we've subtracted too much; some distributions have been excluded twice because they have two children receiving more than the 'limit'. We need to add these back one time to correct the count (3 * C(n - 2 * limit, 2)
).
That's the overall approach, which uses combinatorial mathematics to find the total number of distributions while making adjustments based on the limit
to exclude or re-include certain possibilities as per the problem's conditions.
Learn more about Math and Combinatorics patterns.
Solution Approach
The solution approach to this problem uses a Python class Solution
with a method distributeCandies
that takes n
and limit
as its parameters and returns the total number of ways to distribute the candies among 3
children according to the given constraints.
-
Early Termination Condition: The implementation checks if
n
is greater than3 * limit
; if this is true, it means that there is no possible way to distribute the candies without breaking the maximum limit for at least one child. Therefore, the method returns 0 as the number of ways. -
Initial Combination Computation: If the early termination condition is not met, the method then computes the initial number of possible distributions ignoring the limit. This is done using the combinatorial formula
C(n + 2, 2)
, which translates to the number of ways to choose2
partitions fromn + 2
options (initial number of candies plus 2 virtual balls). -
Exclusion of Over-limit Distributions: Next, if there are more candies than
limit
, the method calculates and subtracts from the total the number of distributions where at least one child gets more thanlimit
candies. This is done by computing3 * C(n - limit + 1, 2)
—the number of possible distributions for the excess candies while considering all three children. -
Inclusion-Exclusion Principle: Lastly, if
n - 2
is greater than or equal to2 * limit
, the distributions where two boxes have exceeded the limit have been subtracted twice (once for each child). To correct this, the method adds back the number of possibilities of over-limit distributions for two children, which is computed by3 * C(n - 2 * limit, 2)
. -
Return the Corrected Total: The resulting number of distributions, after including and excluding the appropriate counts, represents the total number of ways candies can be distributed according to the rules.
The combinatorial calculations are likely made using a function or formula that computes combinations (comb
). The combination formula for C(n, k)
is essentially n! / (k! * (n - k)!)
, where !
represents the factorial operation.
In summary, the implementation uses combinatorial mathematics to count the initial number of distributions and then applies the principle of inclusion-exclusion to adjust the count, adhering to the constraints of the distribution limit for each child. The solution showcases a thoughtful use of combinatorial patterns to solve a constrained distribution problem.
Ready to land your dream job?
Unlock your dream job with a 2-minute evaluator for a personalized learning plan!
Start EvaluatorExample Walkthrough
Let's walk through a small example to illustrate the solution approach. Consider the case where we have n = 5
candies to distribute among 3
children, with a limit = 2
candies per child.
We'll follow the steps outlined in the solution approach:
-
Early Termination Condition: First, we need to check whether distributing
5
candies is possible without exceeding the limit of2
candies per child. Sincen = 5
is not greater than3 * limit
(which is3 * 2 = 6
), we do not terminate early. There is at least one way to distribute the candies without breaking the maximum limit for any child. -
Initial Combination Computation: Without considering the limit, we would calculate the number of ways to distribute the
5
candies using the combinatorial formulaC(n + 2, 2)
. Here,n + 2
equals7
(which includes the 5 candies plus 2 virtual balls representing partitions). So we need to compute the number of ways to choose2
partitions from7
options, which isC(7, 2)
. This is equal to7! / (2! * (7 - 2)!) = 21
ways. -
Exclusion of Over-limit Distributions: There are more candies than the
limit
per child, so we need to subtract the combinations where one child gets more than2
candies. We compute3 * C(5 - 2 + 1, 2)
, which simplifies to3 * C(4, 2)
. This equals3 * (4! / (2! * (4 - 2)!)) = 3 * 6 = 18
ways that must be excluded (where 3 represents the number of children). -
Inclusion-Exclusion Principle: Since
5 - 2
is not greater or equal to2 * limit
(which would be4
), this step doesn't apply. There are no possibilities of over-limit distributions for two children to add back. -
Return the Corrected Total: The total number of permissible distributions, after excluding the over-limit scenarios, is
21 - 18 = 3
ways.
Thus, if we have 5
candies and a limit of 2
candies per child, there are 3
ways to distribute the candies without any child receiving more than 2
candies. The three distributions meeting the criteria would be as follows: (2, 2, 1), (2, 1, 2), and (1, 2, 2).
This example illustrates how the proposed solution approach applies the principle of combinatorial mathematics and the principle of inclusion-exclusion to solve the problem with the given constraints.
Solution Implementation
1from math import comb
2
3class Solution:
4 def distributeCandies(self, candidates: int, limit: int) -> int:
5 # If candidates are more than three times the limit, no distribution is possible.
6 if candidates > 3 * limit:
7 return 0
8
9 # Calculate the total possible distributions without any restrictions
10 # This is the number of combinations to distribute `candidates` into 3 boxes
11 # (ans is short for answer and represents the total number of distributions)
12 total_distributions = comb(candidates + 2, 2)
13
14 # Subtract the distributions that exceed the limit in any box
15 # This happens when the number of candidates exceeds the limit
16 if candidates > limit:
17 total_distributions -= 3 * comb(candidates - limit + 1, 2)
18
19 # Add back the distributions that were subtracted more than once
20 # This correction is needed when candidates are twice over the limit,
21 # as those would be subtracted twice in the previous step
22 if candidates - 2 >= 2 * limit:
23 total_distributions += 3 * comb(candidates - 2 * limit, 2)
24
25 # Return the final count of valid distributions
26 return total_distributions
27
1class Solution {
2
3 // This method is designed to distribute candies among three children with a certain limit
4 public long distributeCandies(int candies, int limit) {
5
6 // If the candies are more than three times the limit, no valid distribution is possible
7 if (candies > 3 * limit) {
8 return 0;
9 }
10
11 // Calculate the basic number of distributions without limits using combinatorics
12 long distributions = combinationOfTwo(candies + 2);
13
14 // Adjust the distribution count by accounting for the limit
15 if (candies > limit) {
16 distributions -= 3 * combinationOfTwo(candies - limit + 1);
17 }
18
19 // Further adjust the distribution if needed when candies are twice over the limit
20 if (candies - 2 >= 2 * limit) {
21 distributions += 3 * combinationOfTwo(candies - 2 * limit);
22 }
23
24 // Return the total number of valid distributions
25 return distributions;
26 }
27
28 // Helper method to calculate combinations, choosing 2 from n (nC2)
29 private long combinationOfTwo(int n) {
30 // Use long to avoid integer overflow for large n values
31 return 1L * n * (n - 1) / 2;
32 }
33}
34
1class Solution {
2public:
3 long long distributeCandies(int candies, int limit) {
4 // Define a lambda function to calculate combinations of 2 from a given number
5 auto calculateComb2 = [](int number) -> long long {
6 return static_cast<long long>(number) * (number - 1) / 2;
7 };
8
9 // If the number of candies is more than triple the limit, no distribution is possible
10 if (candies > 3 * limit) {
11 return 0;
12 }
13
14 // Calculate the base number of distributions for n + 2
15 long long distributionCount = calculateComb2(candies + 2);
16
17 // If there are more candies than the limit, subtract invalid distributions
18 if (candies > limit) {
19 distributionCount -= 3 * calculateComb2(candies - limit + 1);
20 }
21
22 // Add back any distributions that were subtracted twice
23 if (candies - 2 >= 2 * limit) {
24 distributionCount += 3 * calculateComb2(candies - 2 * limit);
25 }
26
27 // Return the final count of distributions
28 return distributionCount;
29 }
30};
31
1// Function to calculate the number of combinations to distribute candies
2// n represents the number of candies
3// limit represents the maximum number of candies per person
4function distributeCandies(candies: number, limit: number): number {
5 // Helper function to compute combinations of 2 from n
6 const combinationsOfTwo = (n: number) => (n * (n - 1)) / 2;
7
8 // If the number of candies is more than three times the limit
9 // it's not possible to distribute the candies fairly, so return 0
10 if (candies > 3 * limit) {
11 return 0;
12 }
13
14 // Calculate basic combination count for candies + 2
15 let answer = combinationsOfTwo(candies + 2);
16
17 // If there are more candies than the limit, adjust the number
18 // of combinations by subtracting impossible distributions
19 if (candies > limit) {
20 answer -= 3 * combinationsOfTwo(candies - limit + 1);
21 }
22
23 // If the number of candies minus 2 is at least double the limit,
24 // adjust the number of combinations by adding back some distributions
25 if (candies - 2 >= 2 * limit) {
26 answer += 3 * combinationsOfTwo(candies - 2 * limit);
27 }
28
29 // Return the final count of valid candy distributions
30 return answer;
31}
32
Time and Space Complexity
The time complexity of the code is O(1)
. This is because the operations consist of a fixed number of mathematical operations: addition, multiplication, and function comb
, which calculates the binomial coefficient. The comb
function internally likely uses a direct formula for calculation, and thus it takes a constant time regardless of the input size.
The space complexity of the code is also O(1)
. The reason for this is that the amount of memory used does not scale with the size of the input n
; only a fixed number of variables (ans
) and constants are in use, and the space required for the computation of the comb
function is also constant.
Learn more about how to find time and space complexity quickly using problem constraints.
Which algorithm should you use to find a node that is close to the root of the tree?
Recommended Readings
Math for Technical Interviews How much math do I need to know for technical interviews The short answer is about high school level math Computer science is often associated with math and some universities even place their computer science department under the math faculty However the reality is that you
Backtracking Template Prereq DFS with States problems dfs_with_states Combinatorial search problems Combinatorial search problems involve finding groupings and assignments of objects that satisfy certain conditions Finding all permutations combinations subsets and solving Sudoku are classic combinatorial problems The time complexity of combinatorial problems often grows rapidly with the size of
LeetCode Patterns Your Personal Dijkstra's Algorithm to Landing Your Dream Job The goal of AlgoMonster is to help you get a job in the shortest amount of time possible in a data driven way We compiled datasets of tech interview problems and broke them down by patterns This way we
Want a Structured Path to Master System Design Too? Don’t Miss This!