1196. How Many Apples Can You Put into the Basket
Problem Description
The problem involves a basket with a maximum weight limit of 5000
units and a list of integers representing the weights of several apples. The task is to find the maximum number of apples that can be placed in the basket without exceeding the weight limit. This is an optimization problem where you must maximize the quantity of items selected under a certain constraint, in this case, the weight capacity of the basket.
Intuition
The intuition behind the solution is to use a greedy algorithm approach. It makes intuitive sense to start by adding the lightest apples to the basket first, as this would allow us to fit more apples into the basket. By sorting the weights of the apples, we ensure we always consider the lightest apple available for placement in the basket next.
Once we have the sorted list, we iterate through the list, keeping track of the total weight added to the basket so far. We continue to add apples one at a time until adding another apple would exceed the weight limit of 5000
units. When we reach an apple that we cannot add without exceeding the limit, we stop and return the number of apples we have added up to that point.
Solution Approach
The solution follows a straightforward approach aligned with greedy algorithms, which often provide an optimal solution to optimization problems under certain conditions. Here is how it's implemented:
-
Sorting: We sort the
weight
array to ensure that we pick apples starting from the lightest to the heaviest. Sorting is a common preparatory step in greedy algorithms, facilitating a sequential choice of items based on some criteria—in this case, the weight. -
Iteration with Accumulation: We initialize a variable
s
to zero, representing the current total weight of apples in the basket. -
Iterative Weight Addition: Sequentially, we iterate over the sorted apple weights. For each apple, we add its weight to the current total
s
. As we do this, we check whether the running total exceeds the maximum allowed weight of5000
units. -
Condition Checking: If the addition of the current apple's weight causes the total weight
s
to exceed the limit, the loop breaks, and we return the number of apples that have been successfully added so far, which is given by the current indexi
. -
Returning the Result: If we complete the iteration without exceeding the weight limit, it means all apples in the list have been added to the basket. Hence, we return the total count of apples, which can be obtained using
len(weight)
.
Using this method, the algorithm reaches an efficient solution that maximizes the number of apples within the allowed weight limit. The use of sorting followed by a linear scan of the list is characteristic of many greedy strategies and is effectively employed in this implementation.
Ready to land your dream job?
Unlock your dream job with a 2-minute evaluator for a personalized learning plan!
Start EvaluatorExample Walkthrough
To illustrate the solution approach, let's consider a small example. Suppose we have the following weights for the apples: [600, 1000, 950, 200, 400]
. We aim to place as many of these apples into a basket with a weight limit of 5000 units.
-
Sorting: First, we sort the apples by their weight, resulting in the sorted list
[200, 400, 600, 950, 1000]
. -
Iteration with Accumulation: We start with a total current weight
s
of zero and begin iterating over the list. -
Iterative Weight Addition: As we scan the list, we add the weight of each apple to
s
:- Add 200 (s = 200)
- Add 400 (s = 600)
- Add 600 (s = 1200)
- Add 950 (s = 2150)
- Add 1000 (s = 3150)
We successfully add all the apples in the sorted list to the basket since the total weight does not exceed 5000 units.
-
Condition Checking: At each step of adding an apple, we check if the next addition will exceed the weight limit. In this case, we never reach a point where
s
exceeds 5000, so the condition check always passes. -
Returning the Result: Since we were able to add all apples without surpassing the weight limit, we return the total number of apples, which is 5.
Therefore, using our greedy approach, we concluded that we can fit all five apples in the basket because their combined weight is 3150 units, which is within the 5000-unit limit.
Solution Implementation
1class Solution:
2 def maxNumberOfApples(self, arr: List[int]) -> int:
3 # Sort the weights of the apples in increasing order.
4 arr.sort()
5
6 # Initialize the total weight accumulator.
7 total_weight = 0
8
9 # Iterate over the sorted apple weights.
10 for index, weight in enumerate(arr):
11 # Add the weight of the current apple to the total weight.
12 total_weight += weight
13
14 # Check if the total weight exceeds 5000 grams.
15 if total_weight > 5000:
16 # If so, return the current number of apples.
17 return index
18
19 # If the total weight never exceeds 5000, return the total number of apples.
20 return len(arr)
21
1class Solution {
2 public int maxNumberOfApples(int[] weights) {
3 // Sort the array of apple weights in non-decreasing order
4 Arrays.sort(weights);
5
6 // Initialize the total weight of apples so far to 0
7 int totalWeight = 0;
8
9 // Loop through the sorted apple weights
10 for (int i = 0; i < weights.length; ++i) {
11 // Add the current apple's weight to the total weight
12 totalWeight += weights[i];
13
14 // Check if the total weight exceeds 5000 grams
15 if (totalWeight > 5000) {
16 // If so, return the current number of apples
17 return i;
18 }
19 }
20
21 // If the total weight never exceeds 5000 grams, return the total number of apples
22 return weights.length;
23 }
24}
25
1#include <vector>
2#include <algorithm>
3
4class Solution {
5public:
6 // Function to calculate the maximum number of apples with a weight limit.
7 int maxNumberOfApples(vector<int>& appleWeights) {
8 // Sort the apple weights in non-decreasing order
9 sort(appleWeights.begin(), appleWeights.end());
10
11 int currentWeightSum = 0; // To keep track of the current total weight
12
13 // Iterate through the sorted weights of the apples
14 for (int i = 0; i < appleWeights.size(); ++i) {
15 // Add the weight of the current apple to the total weight
16 currentWeightSum += appleWeights[i];
17
18 // Check if the weight limit is exceeded
19 if (currentWeightSum > 5000) {
20 // Return the maximum number of apples before exceeding the weight limit
21 return i;
22 }
23 }
24
25 // If the weight limit is not exceeded, return the total count of apples
26 return appleWeights.size();
27 }
28};
29
1/**
2 * Finds the maximum number of apples that can fit within a weight limit.
3 * Assumes each apple's weight is given in an array, with a weight limit of 5000.
4 * @param appleWeights Array of individual apple weights.
5 * @returns The maximum number of apples that can be included without exceeding the weight limit.
6 */
7function maxNumberOfApples(appleWeights: number[]): number {
8 // Sort the array of apple weights in ascending order to pack lighter apples first.
9 appleWeights.sort((a, b) => a - b);
10
11 // Initialize the sum of apple weights.
12 let totalWeight = 0;
13
14 // Loop through the sorted apple weights.
15 for (let i = 0; i < appleWeights.length; ++i) {
16 // Add the weight of the current apple to the total weight sum.
17 totalWeight += appleWeights[i];
18
19 // If the weight limit is exceeded with the current apple, return the number of apples before this one.
20 if (totalWeight > 5000) {
21 return i;
22 }
23 }
24
25 // If the total weight never exceeds the limit, return the total number of apples.
26 return appleWeights.length;
27}
28
Time and Space Complexity
The given Python code snippet sorts the input list weight
and then iterates through the sorted list to calculate the cumulative weight until it exceeds the limit of 5000, or until all the apples are counted.
Time Complexity:
The time complexity of the algorithm is dominated by the sorting operation at the beginning. Sorting a list of n
elements typically has a time complexity of O(n log n)
when using the built-in sorted function in Python (Timsort algorithm). After sorting, there is a single pass over the input list to calculate the cumulative weight. The single pass has a time complexity of O(n)
, where n
is the number of elements in weight
.
Since the sorting cost is higher than the single pass, the overall time complexity of the code is O(n log n)
.
Space Complexity:
The space complexity is O(1)
(constant space) aside from the space required to store the input, because the sorting is done in-place (altering the input list itself) and only a few extra variables (i
, x
, s
) are used to keep track of the running total and index. Therefore, the space required does not depend on the size of the input list.
Learn more about how to find time and space complexity quickly using problem constraints.
Which of the tree traversal order can be used to obtain elements in a binary search tree in sorted order?
Recommended Readings
Greedy Introduction div class responsive iframe iframe src https www youtube com embed WTslqPbj7I title YouTube video player frameborder 0 allow accelerometer autoplay clipboard write encrypted media gyroscope picture in picture web share allowfullscreen iframe div When do we use greedy Greedy algorithms tend to solve optimization problems Typically they will ask you to calculate the max min of some value Commonly you may see this phrased in the problem as max min longest shortest largest smallest etc These keywords can be identified by just scanning
Sorting Summary Comparisons We presented quite a few sorting algorithms and it is essential to know the advantages and disadvantages of each one The basic algorithms are easy to visualize and easy to learn for beginner programmers because of their simplicity As such they will suffice if you don't know any advanced
LeetCode Patterns Your Personal Dijkstra's Algorithm to Landing Your Dream Job The goal of AlgoMonster is to help you get a job in the shortest amount of time possible in a data driven way We compiled datasets of tech interview problems and broke them down by patterns This way we
Want a Structured Path to Master System Design Too? Don’t Miss This!