1595. Minimum Cost to Connect Two Groups of Points
Problem Description
In this problem, we have two distinct groups of points, with the first group containing size1
points and the second group size2
points, and it's given that size1 >= size2
. There is a matrix provided where cost[i][j]
represents the cost to connect point i
from the first group to point j
in the second group.
The objective is to connect every point in both groups such that every point in the first group is connected to one or more points in the second group, and vice versa, with the aim to minimize the total cost of all the connections.
To solve this, we are seeking the minimum total cost to connect both groups following the rule that connections can be between any point in the first group to any point in the second group.
Intuition
The intuition behind the solution involves dynamic programming with bitmasking to efficiently compute the minimum cost while keeping track of the connections that have been made.
Given that the first group has at least as many points as the second, we iterate over each point in the first group and for each, we consider different combinations of connections with the points in the second group. For each point in the first group, we utilize a bitmask to represent the connection state of the second group's points (i.e., whether they are connected to the first group or not).
The 'f' array in the code is initialized with infinity values and represents the minimum cost to reach a given state of connections, where the state is encoded as a bitmask. The array 'g' is a copy of 'f' which is used to keep track of the costs of the next state we're computing.
The function iterates over each point in the first group. For each of these points (indexed as i
), we explore connecting it to every point k
in the second group, updating the minimum cost to achieve different connection states as represented by the bitmask j
.
The essence of the dynamic programming lies in the fact that for each possible connection state 'j', where we only consider second group's points that are already connected (encoded by j
), we calculate the minimum cost required to connect the current point 'i' to any of the second group's points that the current state 'j' indicates as connected.
The cost is updated based on the previously known minimum costs for other states ('f[j]'), and we consider connecting to a new point in the second group. This keeps track of the minimum cost to maintain a connection from the second group to the first (so that no point is left unconnected).
After iterating over all points in both groups, 'f[-1]' will hold the minimum cost to connect all points in the first group to any point in the second group, having explored all possible connection states.
Learn more about Dynamic Programming and Bitmask patterns.
Solution Approach
To implement the solution, the algorithm leverages dynamic programming and bitwise operations to efficiently track and compute the minimum cost of connecting the groups.
The data structure used to keep track of the state of the second group's connection status is an array f
of size 2^n
(where n
is the number of points in the second group). The reason for using 2^n
is to represent all possible combinations of connections between two groups using bit masks. Each bit in the mask can denote whether a respective point in the second group is connected (1
meaning connected and 0
meaning not connected).
The steps followed in the algorithm are:
-
Initialize
f
withinf
(infinity) values, exceptf[0]
which is set to0
. Here,f
is used to store the minimum cost for each state of connections.f[0] = 0
because initially, no connections are made, and thus the cost is zero. -
Make a copy of
f
asg
that will be used to calculate the costs for the next iteration without changing the existing values used as part of the calculation. -
Iterate through each point
i
in the first group (from1
tom
), and for each, iterate over all possible statesj
(which is represented by the bitmasks). -
Inside the nested loop, the algorithm iterates across each point
k
in the second group and each state of connections to calculate the minimum cost. -
When considering a connection from point
i
in the first group to pointk
in the second group, the code checks the bits ofj
to determine if pointk
is already connected; if not,continue
to the next possible point. -
The minimum cost to add this connection, given the current state
j
, is computed byc + min(f[j], f[j ^ (1 << k)])
, wherec
is the cost of connecting pointi
to pointk
,f[j]
is the current minimum cost for the statej
, andf[j ^ (1 << k)]
is the cost for the state we'd have if pointk
were not connected (achieved by XOR'ingj
with a bitmask with bitk
set). -
Update the temporary
g[j]
with the calculated cost for this connection, but choose the minimum between the newly calculated costx
and the existingg[j]
to ensure we're keeping the lowest cost as we explore all combinations for this state. -
After considering all points in the first group and their connections to the second group, copy the temporary cost array
g
tof
to be used for the next iteration. -
Once all points are processed, the last element of
f
(i.e.f[-1]
) will contain the minimum total cost to connect every point in the first group with the points in the second group considering thatf[-1]
represents the state where all points in the second group are connected.
The algorithm makes sure to find an optimum way to make these connections by considering all possible states of the second group's connectivity for each point in the first group.
Ready to land your dream job?
Unlock your dream job with a 2-minute evaluator for a personalized learning plan!
Start EvaluatorExample Walkthrough
Let's walk through a small example to illustrate the solution approach. For simplicity, let's say we have the first group of points with size1 = 3
and the second group with size2 = 2
. The cost
matrix is as follows:
cost = [ [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 1] ]
Where cost[i][j]
is the cost of connecting point i
from the first group to point j
in the second group.
Following the solution approach:
-
We initialize
f
withinf
values such thatf = [inf, inf, inf, inf]
, but setf[0] = 0
. -
We create a copy of
f
and call itg
. At the start,g
is the same asf
:g = [inf, inf, inf, inf]
, but withg[0] = 0
. -
We start by iterating over points in the first group. For the first point
i = 0
, we consider each possible second group connection state represented byj
. We look at all possible bitmasks from0 to 3
(0b00 to 0b11
in binary, becausesize2 = 2
). -
While at point
i = 0
, for each state, we examine potential connections to each pointk
in the second group. Pointk
ranges from0 to 1
. -
If state
j
indicates pointk
is not already connected, we calculate the cost to connect and updateg[j]
. -
For example, group 1 point 0 connecting to group 2 point 0 is considered. The bitmask
j
is0
(no connections yet), so we calculate a new costc = 1
(fromcost[0][0]
). The new state after connection isj ^ (1 << 0) = 1
(binary0b01
), and we updateg[1] = min(inf, 0 + 1) = 1
. -
We repeat this for all connections from group 1 point 0. If we connect to the second point in group 2, the new state would be
j ^ (1 << 1) = 2
(binary0b10
), and we updateg[2] = min(inf, 0 + 2) = 2
. -
After processing all connections from the first point in group 1, we copy the costs from
g
tof
, makingf = [0, 1, 2, inf]
. -
We now repeat the steps for the next point in the first group (point
i = 1
). We consider the same possible states and updateg
accordingly. -
After processing all points in the first group, each state
j
of the second group's points indicates what the minimum cost is to reach that state. -
The final minimum cost to connect all points with this example would be found in
f[-1]
.
For this simple example, the final state of f
after processing all points could be something like [0, 1, 2, 4]
, indicating that the minimum cost to connect every point in the first group with every point in the second group is 4
. This represents the state where both points in the second group are connected to at least one point in the first group.
Solution Implementation
1class Solution:
2 def connectTwoGroups(self, cost: List[List[int]]) -> int:
3 # Get the size of group A and group B
4 size_group_a, size_group_b = len(cost), len(cost[0])
5
6 # Initialize the dp array f with infinite value for set states
7 dp = [float('inf')] * (1 << size_group_b)
8 # Initially, the cost to connect no elements from group B is 0
9 dp[0] = 0
10
11 # Initialize a temporary array 'next_dp' the same as 'dp' to store next state values
12 next_dp = dp[:]
13
14 # Loop for each element in group A
15 for i in range(1, size_group_a + 1):
16 # Update states for the new element of group A
17 for state in range(1 << size_group_b):
18 next_dp[state] = float('inf')
19
20 # Try to connect the i-th element of group A with each element of group B
21 for j in range(size_group_b):
22 # If the j-th element of group B is not in the current state, skip
23 if (state >> j & 1) == 0:
24 continue
25
26 # Calculate the cost to connect the i-th element of group A with the j-th element of group B
27 c = cost[i - 1][j]
28
29 # Determine the new state by removing the j-th element from the current state
30 new_state = state ^ (1 << j)
31
32 # Compute the total cost for the new state
33 # and compare with previous costs to find the minimum
34 total_cost = min(next_dp[new_state], dp[state], dp[new_state]) + c
35
36 # Update the cost for the current state
37 next_dp[state] = min(next_dp[state], total_cost)
38
39 # Move to the next state
40 dp = next_dp[:]
41
42 # Return the minimum total cost to connect all elements from both groups
43 return dp[-1]
44
1class Solution {
2 public int connectTwoGroups(List<List<Integer>> cost) {
3 int numRows = cost.size(); // Number of rows in the cost matrix
4 int numCols = cost.get(0).size(); // Number of columns in the cost matrix
5 final int INFINITY = 1 << 30; // Define an "infinity" value to be used for comparison
6
7 int[] dp = new int[1 << numCols]; // Dynamic programming (dp) array for the previous round
8 Arrays.fill(dp, INFINITY); // Initialize all values to infinity
9 dp[0] = 0; // Starting with no connections, the cost is zero
10 int[] dpNext = dp.clone(); // Clone the dp array for processing the next row
11
12 // Outer loop processes each row of the cost matrix
13 for (int i = 1; i <= numRows; ++i) {
14 // Initialize dpNext for each row calculation
15 Arrays.fill(dpNext, INFINITY);
16
17 // Go through all the possible states (combinations of connections) in dpNext
18 for (int state = 0; state < (1 << numCols); ++state) {
19
20 // Check each column in the current row
21 for (int col = 0; col < numCols; ++col) {
22 // If the current state includes a connection to the col-th column
23 if ((state >> col & 1) == 1) {
24 int connectionCost = cost.get(i - 1).get(col); // Get the cost for connecting the current row with col-th column
25
26 // Update dpNext[state] with the minimum of three possible scenarios:
27 // 1. Connect the current row's col-th column with previous state excluding col-th column and add the cost
28 dpNext[state] = Math.min(dpNext[state], dpNext[state ^ (1 << col)] + connectionCost);
29 // 2. Connect the current row's col-th column with the previous row's state and add the cost
30 dpNext[state] = Math.min(dpNext[state], dp[state] + connectionCost);
31 // 3. Connect the current row's col-th column with the previous row's state excluding col-th column and add the cost
32 dpNext[state] = Math.min(dpNext[state], dp[state ^ (1 << col)] + connectionCost);
33 }
34 }
35 }
36
37 // Copy the dpNext into dp for the next round/row
38 System.arraycopy(dpNext, 0, dp, 0, 1 << numCols);
39 }
40
41 // Final answer is at dp[(1 << numCols) - 1], which represents all columns connected
42 return dp[(1 << numCols) - 1];
43 }
44}
45
1class Solution {
2public:
3 int connectTwoGroups(vector<vector<int>>& costs) {
4 int numLeft = costs.size(); // Number of nodes on the left
5 int numRight = costs[0].size(); // Number of nodes on the right
6 const int INF = 1 << 30; // Define an "infinity" value for comparison purposes
7 vector<int> currDp(1 << numRight, INF); // Current DP state, initially set to "infinity"
8 currDp[0] = 0; // The cost to connect an empty subset is 0
9 vector<int> nextDp = currDp; // The next DP state to be calculated
10
11 // Loop through each node on the left
12 for (int i = 1; i <= numLeft; ++i) {
13 // Calculate next DP state for every subset of right nodes
14 for (int mask = 0; mask < (1 << numRight); ++mask) {
15 nextDp[mask] = INF; // Reset the next DP state to "infinity"
16 // Iterate through each bit/node in the mask
17 for (int k = 0; k < numRight; ++k) {
18 // Check if the k-th node on the right is included in the subset
19 if (mask & (1 << k)) {
20 // The cost to connect the i-1-th node on the left and k-th node on the right
21 int connectionCost = costs[i - 1][k];
22
23 // The new cost is the minimum of three potential previous states plus the new connectionCost
24 int newCost = min({nextDp[mask ^ (1 << k)], currDp[mask], currDp[mask ^ (1 << k)]}) + connectionCost;
25
26 // Update the next DP state with the new cost if it's smaller than the current cost
27 nextDp[mask] = min(nextDp[mask], newCost);
28 }
29 }
30 }
31 // Swap the current DP state with the next one for the subsequent iteration
32 currDp.swap(nextDp);
33 }
34 // Return the minimum cost to connect all nodes on the left to some subset of nodes on the right
35 return currDp[(1 << numRight) - 1];
36 }
37};
38
1function connectTwoGroups(cost: number[][]): number {
2 const groupSizeA = cost.length; // Size of the first group
3 const groupSizeB = cost[0].length; // Size of the second group
4 const infinity = 1 << 30; // A large number to represent infinity
5 const dpCurrent = new Array(1 << groupSizeB).fill(infinity); // DP array to keep track of minimum costs for current iteration
6 dpCurrent[0] = 0; // Base case: cost for connecting no elements from Group B
7 const dpNext = new Array(1 << groupSizeB).fill(0); // DP array for the next iteration
8
9 // Loop through each element in Group A
10 for (let i = 1; i <= groupSizeA; ++i) {
11 // Loop through all subsets of Group B
12 for (let subsetMask = 0; subsetMask < (1 << groupSizeB); ++subsetMask) {
13 dpNext[subsetMask] = infinity; // Reset the next DP array entry to infinity
14
15 // For each element in Group B, try to make connections
16 for (let j = 0; j < groupSizeB; ++j) {
17 // Check if element j is in the current subset mask
18 if (((subsetMask >> j) & 1) === 1) {
19 const currentCost = cost[i - 1][j];
20
21 // Update dpNext for removing element j from the subset
22 dpNext[subsetMask] = Math.min(dpNext[subsetMask], dpNext[subsetMask ^ (1 << j)] + currentCost);
23
24 // Update dpNext based on the current dp (previous iteration) keeping element j
25 dpNext[subsetMask] = Math.min(dpNext[subsetMask], dpCurrent[subsetMask] + currentCost);
26
27 // Update dpNext based on the current dp (previous iteration) removing element j
28 dpNext[subsetMask] = Math.min(dpNext[subsetMask], dpCurrent[subsetMask ^ (1 << j)] + currentCost);
29 }
30 }
31 }
32
33 // Copy the dpNext values to dpCurrent to be used in the next iteration
34 dpCurrent.splice(0, dpCurrent.length, ...dpNext);
35 }
36
37 // Return the minimum cost for connecting all elements in both groups
38 return dpCurrent[(1 << groupSizeB) - 1];
39}
40
Time and Space Complexity
The given code is an implementation of a dynamic programming algorithm designed to solve a problem that seems to involve connecting two groups with certain costs. It uses bit masking to represent subsets of connections between the groups.
Time Complexity:
To calculate the time complexity, let's break down the nested loops in the code:
- There is an outer loop that runs
m
times, wherem
is the length of the first dimension ofcost
. - Inside this loop, there is another loop that runs for all subsets of the second group, which is
2^n
times, wheren
is the length of the second dimension ofcost
. - Finally, within the second loop, there is an innermost loop that iterates over all
n
elements of the second group.
The innermost loop checks and updates the best cost to connect elements of the first group to a subset of elements of the second group.
Therefore, the time complexity is O(m * n * 2^n)
, as for each of the m
elements in the first group and for each of the 2^n
subsets of the second group, we perform n
checks and updates.
Space Complexity:
As for the space complexity, there are two main data structures to consider: the f
and g
arrays. Each of these arrays has a length of 2^n
, as they store subsets of the second group.
Hence, the space complexity is O(2^n)
, as this is the largest amount of space used by the algorithm at any point in time.
Learn more about how to find time and space complexity quickly using problem constraints.
Which of the following uses divide and conquer strategy?
Recommended Readings
What is Dynamic Programming Prerequisite DFS problems dfs_intro Backtracking problems backtracking Memoization problems memoization_intro Pruning problems backtracking_pruning Dynamic programming is an algorithmic optimization technique that breaks down a complicated problem into smaller overlapping sub problems in a recursive manner and uses solutions to the sub problems to construct a solution
Bitmask and Dynamic Programming Bit manipulation is a crucial aspect of computer programming and one of the most powerful tools for bit manipulation is bitmasks Let's first understand what a bit is A bit is a binary digit It's the smallest piece of data in a computer and can be
LeetCode Patterns Your Personal Dijkstra's Algorithm to Landing Your Dream Job The goal of AlgoMonster is to help you get a job in the shortest amount of time possible in a data driven way We compiled datasets of tech interview problems and broke them down by patterns This way we
Want a Structured Path to Master System Design Too? Don’t Miss This!