2335. Minimum Amount of Time to Fill Cups
Problem Description
You are tasked with using a water dispenser that can dispense cold, warm, and hot water to fill cups. Each type of water (cold, warm, hot) corresponds to an array position (amount[0], amount[1], and amount[2] respectively) indicating how many cups of each type you need to fill. The machine has two modes of operation:
- In one second, it can fill two cups of different types of water.
- In one second, it can fill one cup of any type of water.
The goal is to find the minimum number of seconds required to fill all the cups as per the amount array.
Intuition
The intuition behind the solution comes down to maximizing the efficiency of the water dispenser. Because we can fill two cups of different water types in one go, it is in our best interest to fill two cups as often as possible. One key insight is identifying that if the sum of cups needed for the two lesser needed water types (amount[0] and amount[1]) is less than or equal to the number of cups needed for the most-needed type (amount[2]), then the minimum time will be equal to the maximum amount among the three. This is because while we fill up cups of type 2, we can always pair them with cups from types 0 or 1 without ever having to wait.
However, in cases where the amount needed for types 0 and 1 in aggregate is more than type 2, simply matching two cups at a time is not sufficient. In such a scenario, we would divide the total sum of cups by 2, since that's the maximum throughput per second we could achieve. If there is an odd number of cups, it takes an extra second to fill the last one, hence the addition of 1 before dividing by 2. Sorting the amount array helps us easily identify the scenarios, ensuring that amount[2] is always the largest value that can potentially limit the speed at which all cups are filled.
The solution correctly computes the minimum number of seconds by considering both possibilities: either by being constrained by the largest single type (when the largest amount is greater than the sum of the other two), or by optimally using the dispenser's ability to fill two different cups in a second, evenly distributing the effort.
Learn more about Greedy, Sorting and Heap (Priority Queue) patterns.
How many times is a tree node visited in a depth first search?
Solution Approach
The solution follows a simple yet effective approach to solve the problem, making use of the following steps:
-
Sorting the Array: Firstly, the
amountarray is sorted. By doing this, we ensure thatamount[2]will have the largest value among the three, which is crucial for the logic that follows. -
Identifying Constraints: The solution checks if the sum of the two smaller amounts (
amount[0]+amount[1]) is less than or equal to the largest amount (amount[2]). This is an important condition because if it's true, it implies that we can always pair any cup we fill from the largest amount with another type, hence the total time will be constrained by the largest amount. In other words, while we fill theamount[2]cups, we'll also be able to fill the cups of typesamount[0]andamount[1]in parallel without any additional time. -
Computing the Time: If the previous condition is true, the function returns the value of
amount[2], as we're constrained by this number. If not, the solution computes the total sum of all the amounts and divides it by 2 (since two cups can be filled per second at most). If there's an odd number of cups, we'll need an extra second to fill the last one, hence the sum is incremented by 1 before dividing by 2. -
Returning the Result: The result from the computation gives us the minimum number of seconds required to fill all cups, fulfilling the problem's requirement.
The solution does not require complex data structures or algorithms; it is a direct application of math and logic based on the parameters of the problem. The key to optimizing the filling process is the ability to identify when we are limited by the largest amount and when we can proceed by simply dividing the total work by the optimal throughput (two cups per second).
The overall time complexity of the algorithm is O(1), since the input size is constant (always an array of 3 elements) and sorting such a small array is a constant time operation. The space complexity is also O(1), as no additional space is needed regardless of the input.
Depth first search is equivalent to which of the tree traversal order?
Example Walkthrough
Let's use a small example to illustrate the solution approach.
Given Amounts:
Suppose the amount array is given as [5, 3, 1], which corresponds to the number of cups that need to be filled with cold, warm, and hot water, respectively.
Step 1: Sorting the Array
First, we sort the amount array. After sorting, the array changes to [1, 3, 5]. Now, amount[2] is the largest value, which is 5.
Step 2: Identifying Constraints
We check if the sum of the two smaller amounts (amount[0] + amount[1]) is less than or equal to the largest amount (amount[2]). In our example, 1 + 3 is equal to 4, which is less than amount[2] which is 5.
Step 3: Computing the Time
Since the sum of the two smaller amounts (4) is less than the largest amount (5), we can conclude that the dispenser will always be actively filling a cup of the largest amount (cold water in this case) while also filling cups of the other two types. Thus, the time taken is constrained by the largest amount, amount[2].
Therefore, the minimum number of seconds required to fill all the cups is equal to amount[2], which is 5 seconds.
Returning the Result
The solution returns 5 as the minimum number of seconds required to fill all cups. This satisfies the goal since we utilize every second to fill two different types of cups until we run out of the type with the lesser amount, after which we are constrained by the largest amount.
Note that if the amount array was given as [2, 3, 5] instead, after sorting and summing the two smaller amounts (2+3=5), we see that the sum equals the largest amount (amount[2]=5). In this case, the solution would still return 5 seconds as the minimum time required to fill all cups. However, if the amount array was [2, 6, 7], then the sum of the two lesser amounts is 8, which is larger than 7 (amount[2]). Then the total sum would be 2+6+7=15, and we would need 15 + 1 (to account for the odd number of cups) divided by 2, which gives us 8 seconds as the minimum time to fill all the cups.
Solution Implementation
1from typing import List
2
3class Solution:
4 def fillCups(self, amounts: List[int]) -> int:
5 # Sort the amount list in non-decreasing order
6 amounts.sort()
7
8 # Check if the sum of the smallest two is less than or equal to the largest
9 # This means we can pair the smallest amounts with the largest to minimize time
10 if amounts[0] + amounts[1] <= amounts[2]:
11 # In such a case, the time required is determined by the largest amount,
12 # since we will be filling that while simultaneously filling the others
13 return amounts[2]
14
15 # If not, we can pair cups to be filled in a way that minimizes the total time
16 # The time required is half the sum of all amounts, rounded up
17 # This is because we can always fill two cups at a time
18 return (sum(amounts) + 1) // 2
19
20# The implementation can be used as follows:
21# solution = Solution()
22# result = solution.fillCups([1, 3, 5]) # Example input
23# print(result) # Output will be the minimum time required to fill all cups
241import java.util.Arrays; // Import Arrays class for sorting operation
2
3class Solution {
4 // Method to calculate minimum time needed to fill the cups
5 public int fillCups(int[] amounts) {
6 Arrays.sort(amounts); // Sort the amounts array in ascending order
7
8 // If the sum of the two smallest amounts is equal to or less than the largest amount
9 if (amounts[0] + amounts[1] <= amounts[2]) {
10 // Only the largest amount matters, because while filling the largest cup,
11 // the other two can be filled in parallel.
12 return amounts[2];
13 }
14
15 // If the condition is not met, then return half the sum of all amounts
16 // The plus one before dividing by two ensures that we round up, which is necessary
17 // because we are counting discrete units of time and cannot have a partial time unit.
18 return (amounts[0] + amounts[1] + amounts[2] + 1) / 2;
19 }
20}
211#include <algorithm> // Include algorithm for std::sort
2#include <vector> // Include vector for using std::vector
3
4class Solution {
5public:
6 int fillCups(std::vector<int>& amounts) {
7 // First, sort the amounts in non-decreasing order
8 std::sort(amounts.begin(), amounts.end());
9
10 // Check if the sum of the two smallest amounts is less than or equal to the largest amount
11 if (amounts[0] + amounts[1] <= amounts[2]) {
12 // The largest amount determines the minimum time needed
13 // because we can fill the smaller cups simultaneously while filling the largest cup.
14 return amounts[2];
15 } else {
16 // If the sum of the two smallest amounts is greater than the largest amount,
17 // we can simultaneously fill two cups at a time, and it will take more than
18 // just the time for the largest cup.
19 // The total time needed is the sum of all the amounts plus one (for the final pour)
20 // divided by 2 because we fill two cups at a time.
21 return (amounts[0] + amounts[1] + amounts[2] + 1) / 2;
22 }
23 }
24};
251/**
2 * Fills cups with given amounts as quickly as possible, one unit per cup per time step.
3 * At each time step, you should choose two different cups to fill up by one unit each.
4 * If there's only one cup with a remaining amount, you fill that cup by one unit.
5 * The function returns the minimum number of time steps needed to fill all cups.
6 *
7 * @param {number[]} amounts - An array of three integers representing the initial amount in each of the three cups.
8 * @returns {number} The minimum number of time steps necessary to fill all cups.
9 */
10function fillCups(amounts: number[]): number {
11 // Sort the array in ascending order so that amounts[0] <= amounts[1] <= amounts[2].
12 amounts.sort((first, second) => first - second);
13
14 // Destructure the sorted array for better readability.
15 let [smallCup, mediumCup, largeCup] = amounts;
16
17 // Compute the difference between the sum of the smaller cups and the largest cup.
18 let difference = smallCup + mediumCup - largeCup;
19
20 // If the difference is non-positive, we can fill up both smaller cups and then finish with the largest one.
21 if (difference <= 0) {
22 return largeCup;
23 } else {
24 // Otherwise, calculate the number of time steps needed to equalize all cups.
25 // The Math.ceil function is used to account for fractional units from the division that
26 // represents time steps where only one unit can be filled.
27 return Math.ceil(difference / 2) + largeCup;
28 }
29}
30What is the space complexity of the following code?
1int sum(int n) {
2 if (n <= 0) {
3 return 0;
4 }
5 return n + sum(n - 1);
6}
Time and Space Complexity
Time Complexity
The time complexity of the provided code is determined by the sorting operation and the subsequent constant-time calculations.
-
The
sort()method in Python is based on the Timsort algorithm, which has a time complexity ofO(n log n), wherenis the length of the list to be sorted. In this case, since the listamountis always of length 3 (representing the three cups), the sorting time complexity is effectively constant, often denoted asO(1)as it does not grow with input size. -
After sorting, the method performs a few arithmetic operations and comparisons, which are all done in constant time,
O(1).
Therefore, the overall time complexity of the method is O(1) since all operations are constant time for a fixed-size list.
Space Complexity
The space complexity is determined by the amount of additional memory used by the program as a function of the input size.
-
The given code does not utilize any additional space that grows with the size of the input, as the list's size is constant and only a few additional variables are used for the computation.
-
Sorting is done in place, which does not require extra space proportional to the input size.
Thus, the overall space complexity of the method is O(1), representing constant space usage.
Learn more about how to find time and space complexity quickly using problem constraints.
Which of the following array represent a max heap?
Recommended Readings
Greedy Introduction iframe width 560 height 315 src https www youtube com embed WTslqPbj7I title YouTube video player frameborder 0 allow accelerometer autoplay clipboard write encrypted media gyroscope picture in picture web share allowfullscreen iframe When do we use greedy Greedy algorithms tend to solve optimization problems Typically they will ask you
Sorting Summary Comparisons We presented quite a few sorting algorithms and it is essential to know the advantages and disadvantages of each one The basic algorithms are easy to visualize and easy to learn for beginner programmers because of their simplicity As such they will suffice if you don't know any advanced
https algomonster s3 us east 2 amazonaws com cover_photos heap svg Priority Queue and Heap What is the relationship between priority queue and heap Priority Queue is an Abstract Data Type and Heap is the concrete data structure we use to implement a priority queue Priority Queue A priority queue
Got a question?ย Ask the Teaching Assistantย anything you don't understand.
Still not clear? Ask in the Forum, ย Discordย orย Submitย the part you don't understand to our editors.