1899. Merge Triplets to Form Target Triplet
Problem Description
You are given a list of triplets (arrays of three integers) and a target triplet. Your goal is to determine if you can obtain the target triplet by performing a specific merge operation on the given triplets.
The Merge Operation:
- Select any two different triplets at indices
i
andj
- Update triplet at index
j
by taking the maximum of each corresponding position:triplets[j]
becomes[max(ai, aj), max(bi, bj), max(ci, cj)]
For example, if you have triplets[i] = [2, 5, 3]
and triplets[j] = [1, 7, 5]
, after the operation, triplets[j]
becomes [2, 7, 5]
(taking max of each position).
Key Points:
- You can perform this operation any number of times (including zero times)
- The operation always updates one triplet by taking element-wise maximums with another
- You need to check if the exact target triplet
[x, y, z]
can appear in the triplets array after any sequence of operations
The Challenge: The merge operation only allows values to increase or stay the same (never decrease) since we're taking maximums. This means if any triplet has a value larger than the corresponding target value, that triplet can never be part of forming the target.
The solution leverages the fact that we only need to consider triplets where all three values are less than or equal to the corresponding target values. Among these valid triplets, we can merge them all together (taking maximum of each position) to see if we can reach exactly the target values.
Return true
if the target can be obtained, false
otherwise.
Intuition
The key insight comes from understanding what the merge operation actually does - it can only make values go up (or stay the same), never down. When we merge two triplets, each position takes the maximum value from that position in both triplets.
This means if any triplet has even one value that exceeds the corresponding target value, that triplet becomes "poisonous" - we can never use it because it would push us past our target. For example, if our target is [3, 4, 5]
and we have a triplet [2, 6, 4]
, the middle value 6
is already too large. Any merge involving this triplet would result in a middle value of at least 6
, which overshoots our target of 4
.
So we need to be selective - we can only work with triplets where ALL three values are less than or equal to the corresponding target values. These are our "safe" triplets.
Now here's the beautiful part: among all these safe triplets, we can freely merge them together without worry. Why? Because:
- They're all safe (none exceed the target values)
- Merging them can only increase values up to the maximum present
- The best we can possibly do is collect the maximum value from each position across all safe triplets
This leads to a greedy strategy:
- Filter out all unsafe triplets (those with any value exceeding the target)
- Among the safe triplets, find the maximum value at each position
- Check if these maximums exactly match our target
If they match, we know we can achieve the target through some sequence of merges. If they don't match (meaning at least one maximum is less than the target), then it's impossible - we can't reach a value that doesn't exist in any of our safe triplets.
The elegance is that we don't need to track the actual sequence of operations or which triplets to merge - we just need to verify that the required values exist in the safe triplets.
Learn more about Greedy patterns.
Solution Approach
The implementation follows a greedy approach that processes all triplets in a single pass:
Step 1: Initialize tracking variables
- Extract the target values:
x, y, z = target
- Initialize three variables
d, e, f = 0, 0, 0
to track the maximum values we can achieve at each position
Step 2: Filter and collect maximums
For each triplet [a, b, c]
in the input:
- Check if the triplet is "safe":
a <= x and b <= y and c <= z
- If safe, update our maximums:
d = max(d, a)
- track the maximum first valuee = max(e, b)
- track the maximum second valuef = max(f, c)
- track the maximum third value
- If not safe (any value exceeds the target), skip this triplet entirely
Step 3: Verify the result
- After processing all triplets, check if
[d, e, f] == target
- Return
true
if they match,false
otherwise
Why this works:
- By only considering triplets where all values are
<= target
, we ensure we never overshoot - Taking the maximum at each position simulates the best possible outcome of merging all safe triplets together
- If the maximums equal the target, we know those exact values exist and can be combined
- If any maximum is less than the target, it's impossible since that value doesn't exist in any safe triplet
Time Complexity: O(n)
where n
is the number of triplets - we make a single pass through the array
Space Complexity: O(1)
- we only use a constant amount of extra space for variables d
, e
, and f
The beauty of this solution is its simplicity - rather than tracking complex merge operations, we recognize that we just need to verify whether the required values exist among the triplets that don't exceed our target.
Ready to land your dream job?
Unlock your dream job with a 5-minute evaluator for a personalized learning plan!
Start EvaluatorExample Walkthrough
Let's walk through the solution with a concrete example to see how the greedy approach works.
Given:
triplets = [[2,5,3], [1,8,4], [1,7,5]]
target = [2,7,5]
Step 1: Initialize
- Extract target values:
x=2, y=7, z=5
- Initialize maximums:
d=0, e=0, f=0
Step 2: Process each triplet
Processing triplet [2,5,3]:
- Check if safe: Is
2β€2
? β Is5β€7
? β Is3β€5
? β - All conditions met, so this triplet is safe
- Update maximums:
d = max(0, 2) = 2
e = max(0, 5) = 5
f = max(0, 3) = 3
- Current maximums:
[2, 5, 3]
Processing triplet [1,8,4]:
- Check if safe: Is
1β€2
? β Is8β€7
? β - Second value
8
exceeds target value7
, so this triplet is unsafe - Skip this triplet entirely (it would "poison" our result)
- Current maximums remain:
[2, 5, 3]
Processing triplet [1,7,5]:
- Check if safe: Is
1β€2
? β Is7β€7
? β Is5β€5
? β - All conditions met, so this triplet is safe
- Update maximums:
d = max(2, 1) = 2
e = max(5, 7) = 7
f = max(3, 5) = 5
- Current maximums:
[2, 7, 5]
Step 3: Verify result
- Final maximums:
[2, 7, 5]
- Target:
[2, 7, 5]
- They match exactly! Return
true
Why this worked: The algorithm correctly identified that we could achieve the target by:
- Ignoring the "poisonous" triplet
[1,8,4]
(its middle value 8 would overshoot our target of 7) - Combining the safe triplets
[2,5,3]
and[1,7,5]
through merging - The merge would give us
[max(2,1), max(5,7), max(3,5)] = [2,7,5]
, which is exactly our target
Solution Implementation
1class Solution:
2 def mergeTriplets(self, triplets: List[List[int]], target: List[int]) -> bool:
3 # Extract target values for clarity
4 target_x, target_y, target_z = target
5
6 # Initialize maximum values for each position that can contribute to target
7 max_first = 0
8 max_second = 0
9 max_third = 0
10
11 # Iterate through each triplet
12 for first, second, third in triplets:
13 # Only consider triplets where all elements are <= corresponding target elements
14 # This ensures the triplet can potentially contribute without exceeding target
15 if first <= target_x and second <= target_y and third <= target_z:
16 # Track the maximum value achievable at each position
17 max_first = max(max_first, first)
18 max_second = max(max_second, second)
19 max_third = max(max_third, third)
20
21 # Check if we can achieve exactly the target values
22 return [max_first, max_second, max_third] == target
23
1class Solution {
2 public boolean mergeTriplets(int[][] triplets, int[] target) {
3 // Extract target values for clarity
4 int targetX = target[0];
5 int targetY = target[1];
6 int targetZ = target[2];
7
8 // Track the maximum values we can achieve for each position
9 // by merging valid triplets
10 int maxFirst = 0;
11 int maxSecond = 0;
12 int maxThird = 0;
13
14 // Iterate through all triplets
15 for (int[] triplet : triplets) {
16 // Extract current triplet values
17 int currentFirst = triplet[0];
18 int currentSecond = triplet[1];
19 int currentThird = triplet[2];
20
21 // Only consider triplets where all values are less than or equal to target
22 // This ensures we never exceed the target when merging
23 if (currentFirst <= targetX && currentSecond <= targetY && currentThird <= targetZ) {
24 // Update maximum achievable values by taking max operation
25 // This simulates the merge operation where we take max of each position
26 maxFirst = Math.max(maxFirst, currentFirst);
27 maxSecond = Math.max(maxSecond, currentSecond);
28 maxThird = Math.max(maxThird, currentThird);
29 }
30 }
31
32 // Check if we can achieve exactly the target triplet
33 return maxFirst == targetX && maxSecond == targetY && maxThird == targetZ;
34 }
35}
36
1class Solution {
2public:
3 bool mergeTriplets(vector<vector<int>>& triplets, vector<int>& target) {
4 // Extract target values for clarity
5 int targetX = target[0];
6 int targetY = target[1];
7 int targetZ = target[2];
8
9 // Track the maximum achievable values for each position
10 int maxFirst = 0;
11 int maxSecond = 0;
12 int maxThird = 0;
13
14 // Iterate through all triplets
15 for (const auto& triplet : triplets) {
16 int first = triplet[0];
17 int second = triplet[1];
18 int third = triplet[2];
19
20 // Only consider triplets where all values are <= target values
21 // This ensures we never exceed the target when merging
22 if (first <= targetX && second <= targetY && third <= targetZ) {
23 // Update maximum achievable values
24 maxFirst = max(maxFirst, first);
25 maxSecond = max(maxSecond, second);
26 maxThird = max(maxThird, third);
27 }
28 }
29
30 // Check if we can achieve exactly the target values
31 return maxFirst == targetX && maxSecond == targetY && maxThird == targetZ;
32 }
33};
34
1/**
2 * Determines if we can form the target triplet by merging valid triplets.
3 * A triplet can be merged if all its values are less than or equal to the corresponding target values.
4 * The merge operation takes the maximum value at each position from selected triplets.
5 *
6 * @param triplets - Array of triplets where each triplet contains three numbers
7 * @param target - Target triplet to achieve through merging
8 * @returns true if target can be formed by merging valid triplets, false otherwise
9 */
10function mergeTriplets(triplets: number[][], target: number[]): boolean {
11 // Destructure target triplet into individual components
12 const [targetX, targetY, targetZ] = target;
13
14 // Initialize the maximum values we can achieve at each position
15 let maxX: number = 0;
16 let maxY: number = 0;
17 let maxZ: number = 0;
18
19 // Iterate through each triplet
20 for (const [currentX, currentY, currentZ] of triplets) {
21 // Check if current triplet is valid (all values <= corresponding target values)
22 if (currentX <= targetX && currentY <= targetY && currentZ <= targetZ) {
23 // Update maximum achievable values at each position
24 maxX = Math.max(maxX, currentX);
25 maxY = Math.max(maxY, currentY);
26 maxZ = Math.max(maxZ, currentZ);
27 }
28 }
29
30 // Check if we can achieve the exact target values
31 return maxX === targetX && maxY === targetY && maxZ === targetZ;
32}
33
Time and Space Complexity
Time Complexity: O(n)
where n
is the number of triplets in the input list. The algorithm iterates through the triplets list exactly once, performing constant-time operations (comparisons and max operations) for each triplet.
Space Complexity: O(1)
as the algorithm only uses a fixed amount of extra space regardless of the input size. The variables x
, y
, z
, d
, e
, and f
are the only additional space used, which remains constant irrespective of the number of triplets.
Learn more about how to find time and space complexity quickly.
Common Pitfalls
Pitfall 1: Attempting to Track Individual Merge Operations
The Problem: Many developers initially try to simulate the actual merge operations by maintaining which triplets have been merged and tracking the intermediate states. This leads to overly complex code with nested loops and unnecessary state management.
# Incorrect approach - trying to simulate actual merges
def mergeTriplets_wrong(triplets, target):
n = len(triplets)
merged = [False] * n
# Try to simulate merging process
for i in range(n):
for j in range(n):
if i != j and not merged[i]:
# Attempt to merge and track state
new_triplet = [max(triplets[i][k], triplets[j][k]) for k in range(3)]
triplets[j] = new_triplet
merged[i] = True
if triplets[j] == target:
return True
return False
The Solution: Recognize that you don't need to track the actual merge sequence. Since merging only increases values (or keeps them the same), you can simply collect the maximum achievable value at each position from all valid triplets.
Pitfall 2: Not Filtering Out Invalid Triplets Early
The Problem: Some solutions try to use all triplets and then check if the result exceeds the target, leading to incorrect results:
# Incorrect - doesn't filter out triplets that exceed target
def mergeTriplets_wrong2(triplets, target):
max_vals = [0, 0, 0]
for triplet in triplets:
# Wrong: merging without checking if values exceed target
for i in range(3):
max_vals[i] = max(max_vals[i], triplet[i])
# This could result in values greater than target
return max_vals == target
The Solution: Always check if ALL three values in a triplet are less than or equal to their corresponding target values before considering that triplet. If even one value exceeds the target, that triplet can never be part of the solution.
Pitfall 3: Checking Only Partial Conditions
The Problem: Some implementations check if individual values match the target without ensuring all three conditions are met simultaneously:
# Incorrect - checking conditions separately
def mergeTriplets_wrong3(triplets, target):
found_x = False
found_y = False
found_z = False
for a, b, c in triplets:
if a == target[0]:
found_x = True
if b == target[1]:
found_y = True
if c == target[2]:
found_z = True
return found_x and found_y and found_z
This fails because it doesn't ensure that valid values can be combined together. For example, if one triplet is [3, 1, 1]
and another is [1, 3, 1]
, and the target is [3, 3, 2]
, this wrong approach would return True
even though we can never achieve the target value of 2 in the third position.
The Solution: Track the maximum achievable value at each position, but only from triplets where ALL values are within bounds. This ensures that the values you're tracking can actually be merged together to potentially form the target.
Which two pointer techniques do you use to check if a string is a palindrome?
Recommended Readings
Greedy Introduction div class responsive iframe iframe src https www youtube com embed WTslqPbj7I title YouTube video player frameborder 0 allow accelerometer autoplay clipboard write encrypted media gyroscope picture in picture web share allowfullscreen iframe div When do we use greedy Greedy algorithms tend to solve optimization problems Typically they will ask you to calculate the max min of some value Commonly you may see this phrased in the problem as max min longest shortest largest smallest etc These keywords can be identified by just scanning
Coding Interview Patterns Your Personal Dijkstra's Algorithm to Landing Your Dream Job The goal of AlgoMonster is to help you get a job in the shortest amount of time possible in a data driven way We compiled datasets of tech interview problems and broke them down by patterns This way
Recursion Recursion is one of the most important concepts in computer science Simply speaking recursion is the process of a function calling itself Using a real life analogy imagine a scenario where you invite your friends to lunch https assets algo monster recursion jpg You first call Ben and ask
Want a Structured Path to Master System Design Too? Donβt Miss This!