3013. Divide an Array Into Subarrays With Minimum Cost II
Problem Description
You are tasked with taking an array of integers called nums
, which has n
elements, and you need to divide it into k
disjoint contiguous subarrays. The unique challenge here is that the starting indices of the k
subarrays must be such that the starting index of the second subarray and the kth subarray are no more than dist
units apart. The cost of an array is determined by its first element, and your goal is to minimize the sum of the costs for these k
subarrays.
To illustrate, consider you split nums
into subarrays like so: nums[0..(i1 - 1)], nums[i1..(i2 - 1)], ..., nums[i(k-1)..(n - 1)]
, where each i
represents the starting index of a subarray. The condition you must satisfy is that i(k-1) - i1 <= dist
. The problem asks for the minimum possible sum of the first elements from these subarrays.
Intuition
The key to solving this problem is to focus on how we choose the starting points of the k
subarrays to minimize the sum of their first elements while complying with the condition that the distance between the starting indices of the second and the k
th subarray is no more than dist
.
One strategy is to use a sliding window approach to address the constraints related to the indices and their distances. We keep track of a sorted list of values inside our current window, which can be done efficiently using data structures like a SortedList in Python.
At every step, we:
- Add the current element from the
nums
array to our sorted list. - If our list's size is smaller than
k-1
, we add the current element to our running sum. - If the list exceeds
k-1
, we remove the 'k-th' element from our running sum since it will not be the smallest when considering the firstk-1
elements. - We adjust the window if the distance between the start and the current element exceeds
dist
, removing elements from the beginning of the window and adjusting our running sum accordingly.
We are constantly looking for the smallest k-1
elements within our window at any given time, so when we reach the end of the array, we can be sure that we've explored all possible valid subarray combinations, and then we simply add the first element of nums
to the final answer (since the cost of the first subarray is always going to be nums[0]
).
This way, the running sum, at any given time, holds the sum of the smallest k-1
elements within a valid window, and we can update our answer by comparing it with the current running sum. Finally, we return the smallest sum found during the process added to the cost of the first element.
Learn more about Sliding Window and Heap (Priority Queue) patterns.
Solution Approach
The solution employs a two-pointer strategy commonly used in sliding window problems, combined with a SortedList to maintain the contiguous elements in sorted order. This approach effectively balances between the constraints of the problem requirement. Here is a step by step explanation of how the algorithm is implemented:
-
Initialize Pointers and Data Structures:
sl
(SortedList): Helps to keep track of the sorted elements within the current window for efficient addition and removal of elements.y
(int): Stores the cost of the first subarray, which is alwaysnums[0]
.ans
(int): Initializes withfloat("inf")
to hold the minimum cost found.i
(int): Represents the starting index of the current window in thenums
array.running_sum
(int): Accumulator to store the sum of the costs of the firstk-1
smallest elements within the window.
-
Iterate Through the Array:
- Loop through the array starting from the second element because the first element is fixed as the first subarray's cost.
- Get the position where the current element (
nums[j]
) should be inserted insl
using binary search. - Add the current element to
sl
.
-
Maintain
running_sum
andsl
:- When our current window has fewer than
k-1
elements, add every newly encountered element torunning_sum
. - Once we have more than
k-1
elements, remove thek-th
smallest element fromrunning_sum
, as we are only interested in the sum of the firstk-1
smallest elements.
- When our current window has fewer than
-
Adjust the Start Pointer:
- The two-pointer approach is used to keep the
dist
constraint in check. - If the current window size exceeds
dist
, increment the starting indexi
and adjust thesl
andrunning_sum
accordingly. - The element at the start of the current window is removed from
sl
. - The running sum is updated by removing the removed element’s cost, and if necessary, adding the cost of the new
k-2
th smallest element to maintain the firstk-1
smallest elements' sum.
- The two-pointer approach is used to keep the
-
Update the Answer:
- After adjusting the window, if the window has at least
k-1
elements, we have a new potential solution. - Compare the current
running_sum
withans
and updateans
if the current sum is smaller.
- After adjusting the window, if the window has at least
-
Return the Result:
- Since the first subarray cost is always
nums[0]
, add it to theans
to get the minimum possible sum of the costs.
- Since the first subarray cost is always
The code loops through each element in the array only once, making the runtime complexity O(n log k)
given that insertion and removal operations in a SortedList have a logarithmic time complexity and we perform them at most n
times. This approach strategically satisfies all of the problem's constraints, resulting in an efficient and effective solution.
Ready to land your dream job?
Unlock your dream job with a 2-minute evaluator for a personalized learning plan!
Start EvaluatorExample Walkthrough
Let's take an example to walk through the algorithm described above. Assume nums = [5, 2, 4, 1, 6, 3]
, k = 3
, and dist = 3
.
-
Initialize Pointers and Data Structures:
sl
(SortedList) will be used to maintain the sorted order of elements in the current window.y
isnums[0]
, which is5
in our case.ans
is initialized tofloat("inf")
, representing the minimum cost we are looking for.i
is set to1
, since we start from the second element (index 1).running_sum
starts at0
.
-
Iterate Through the Array:
- Start the loop at
j = 1
with element2
innums
.
- Start the loop at
-
Maintain
running_sum
andsl
:- Insert
2
intosl
which is now[2]
.running_sum
becomes2
(since we have fewer thank-1
elements). - Move to the next element,
4
, insert it intosl
which becomes[2, 4]
.running_sum
is2 + 4 = 6
. - Move to
1
, insert intosl
to have[1, 2, 4]
.running_sum
must now only include the smallestk-1 = 2
elements, which are[1, 2]
, sorunning_sum
is updated to1 + 2 = 3
.
- Insert
-
Adjust the Start Pointer:
- Now at index
3
, the element1
has been processed, and we're looking to process element6
, which is at index4
. We're within thedist
constraint (index 4 - index 1 <= dist
), so no adjustments are needed.
- Now at index
-
Update the Answer:
- We now have
k-1 = 2
elements in our window andrunning_sum
is3
. Updateans
frominf
to3 + y = 3 + 5 = 8
.
- We now have
Proceeding with the same steps till the end:
-
When at element
3
(index5
), we would have asl
of[1, 2, 3, 4]
. We ensure the sum of thek-1
smallest elements1 + 2 = 3
is inrunning_sum
. Since our window is too large (index 5 - index 1 = 4 > dist
), we need to pop fromsl
and update the window start. Remove2
(at window start) fromsl
becoming[1, 3, 4]
, adjustrunning_sum
to include1 + 3
, and movei
forward. -
With the running sum now being
4
and we still satisfy the window sizeindex 5 - index 2 = 3 <= dist
, updateans
to4 + y = 4 + 5 = 9
if it's smaller than the previousans
.
- Return the Result:
- After processing all the elements, we found the minimum possible sum of the costs to be
8
(from our prior step). This8
includes the cost of the first element as per the problem statement. - The final answer is
8
, representing the sum of the first elements of thek
disjoint contiguous subarrays.
- After processing all the elements, we found the minimum possible sum of the costs to be
By following these steps, we can efficiently solve the problem using a sliding window approach combined with a sorted list to keep track of the elements and their costs within the window.
Solution Implementation
1from sortedcontainers import SortedList
2import bisect
3
4class Solution:
5 def minimumCost(self, nums: List[int], k: int, dist: int) -> int:
6 # Length of the input numbers list
7 num_length = len(nums)
8
9 # Initialize a sorted list to maintain a sorted order of numbers
10 sorted_list = SortedList()
11
12 # The first element in the nums list as the starting point
13 starting_num = nums[0]
14
15 # Initialize the answer to infinite for future comparison
16 min_cost = float("inf")
17
18 # The window starts from the first element
19 left_index = 1
20
21 # Running sum of the k-1 elements
22 running_sum = 0
23
24 # Loop through the nums list starting from the second element
25 for right_index in range(1, num_length):
26 # Find the position where nums[right_index] should be inserted
27 insert_pos = bisect.bisect_left(sorted_list, nums[right_index])
28
29 # Add the current number to the sorted list
30 sorted_list.add(nums[right_index])
31
32 # If the insert position is less than k - 1, update the running sum
33 if insert_pos < k - 1:
34 running_sum += nums[right_index]
35 # If the sorted list has more than k - 1 elements, subtract the k-th element
36 if len(sorted_list) > k - 1:
37 running_sum -= sorted_list[k - 1]
38
39 # If the window size is larger than allowed by 'dist', adjust the window from the left
40 while right_index - left_index > dist:
41 # Find the index of the left-most number to be removed
42 removed_index = sorted_list.index(nums[left_index])
43 # Remove the left-most element
44 removed_num = nums[left_index]
45 sorted_list.remove(removed_num)
46
47 # Adjust the running sum based on the position of the removed element
48 if removed_index < k - 1:
49 running_sum -= removed_num
50 # If there are still at least k - 1 elements, add the (k-1)-th element to the running sum
51 if len(sorted_list) >= k - 1:
52 running_sum += sorted_list[k - 2]
53 # Move the left window index to the right
54 left_index += 1
55
56 # If the window size is at least k - 1, calculate the cost to consider this subarray
57 if right_index - left_index + 1 >= k - 1:
58 min_cost = min(min_cost, running_sum)
59
60 # Return the minimum cost added with the first element that was set aside
61 return min_cost + starting_num
62
1class Solution {
2 public long minimumCost(int[] nums, int k, int dist) {
3 long minCost = Long.MAX_VALUE; // Initialize the minimum cost to the maximum possible value.
4 long currentSum = 0L;
5 int arrayLength = nums.length;
6
7 // Create two TreeSets to manage the window of numbers within the distance 'dist'.
8 // The first TreeSet (setLower) keeps the smallest 'k' numbers seen so far.
9 // The second TreeSet (setHigher) keeps the rest.
10 // Custom comparator is used to sort the elements based on their values in 'nums'.
11 // In case of a tie, indices are compared to guarantee uniqueness.
12 TreeSet<Integer> setLower = new TreeSet<>((a, b) -> nums[a] == nums[b] ? a - b : nums[a] - nums[b]);
13 TreeSet<Integer> setHigher = new TreeSet<>((a, b) -> nums[a] == nums[b] ? a - b : nums[a] - nums[b]);
14
15 // Start from the first index since the base case will always include nums[0].
16 for (int i = 1; i < arrayLength; i++) {
17 setLower.add(i); // Add the current element to the set of smaller elements.
18 currentSum += nums[i];
19
20 // If there are more than 'k' elements in the lower set, move the largest one to the higher set.
21 if (setLower.size() > k) {
22 int highestInLower = setLower.pollLast();
23 currentSum -= nums[highestInLower];
24 setHigher.add(highestInLower);
25 }
26
27 // Check if we should compute the cost for the current window.
28 if (i - dist > 0) {
29 minCost = Math.min(minCost, currentSum); // Update the minimum cost if needed.
30 int indexToRemove = i - dist; // Compute the index to remove from the current window.
31
32 // Remove the element at 'indexToRemove' from the appropriate set.
33 if (setLower.contains(indexToRemove)) {
34 setLower.remove(indexToRemove);
35 currentSum -= nums[indexToRemove];
36
37 // If higher set has elements, move the smallest one to the lower set to maintain 'k' elements.
38 if (!setHigher.isEmpty()) {
39 int lowestInHigher = setHigher.pollFirst();
40 currentSum += nums[lowestInHigher];
41 setLower.add(lowestInHigher);
42 }
43 } else {
44 setHigher.remove(indexToRemove);
45 }
46 }
47 }
48
49 // Return the minimum cost found plus the base cost (nums[0]).
50 return minCost + nums[0];
51 }
52}
53
1class Solution {
2public:
3 // This function calculates the minimum sum of 'k' elements from each consecutive window of 'dist + 1' elements in the 'nums' vector.
4 long long minimumCost(vector<int>& nums, int k, int dist) {
5 // The small_set keeps the smallest 'k-1' elements, and the large_set keeps the others.
6 multiset<int> small_set, large_set;
7 int window_size = dist + 1;
8 long long window_sum = 0; // Sum of the smallest 'k' elements in the current window.
9 long long min_sum = 0; // Minimum sum found of 'k' elements across all windows.
10
11 // Initialize the first window
12 for (int i = 1; i <= window_size; i++) {
13 small_set.insert(nums[i]);
14 window_sum += nums[i];
15 }
16
17 // Ensure small_set only has 'k-1' smallest values
18 while (small_set.size() > k - 1) {
19 large_set.insert(*small_set.rbegin());
20 window_sum -= *small_set.rbegin();
21 small_set.erase(small_set.find(*small_set.rbegin()));
22 }
23 min_sum = window_sum;
24
25 // Slide the window across the array
26 for (int i = window_size + 1; i < nums.size(); i++) {
27 window_sum += nums[i];
28 small_set.insert(nums[i]);
29
30 // Maintain the two multisets by moving the distanced element to the correct set
31 if (large_set.find(nums[i - window_size]) != large_set.end()) {
32 large_set.erase(large_set.find(nums[i - window_size]));
33 } else {
34 window_sum -= nums[i - window_size];
35 small_set.erase(small_set.find(nums[i - window_size]));
36 }
37
38 // Maintain the size of the small_set ('k-1' elements)
39 while (small_set.size() > k - 1) {
40 window_sum -= *small_set.rbegin();
41 large_set.insert(*small_set.rbegin());
42 small_set.erase(small_set.find(*small_set.rbegin()));
43 }
44
45 // Populate small_set if it has fewer than 'k-1' elements by taking from large_set
46 while (small_set.size() < k - 1) {
47 window_sum += *large_set.begin();
48 small_set.insert(*large_set.begin());
49 large_set.erase(large_set.begin());
50 }
51
52 // Balance the sets, so the elements in small_set are actually smaller than those in large_set
53 while (!small_set.empty() && !large_set.empty() && *small_set.rbegin() > *large_set.begin()) {
54 window_sum -= *small_set.rbegin() - *large_set.begin();
55 small_set.insert(*large_set.begin());
56 large_set.insert(*small_set.rbegin());
57 small_set.erase(small_set.find(*small_set.rbegin()));
58 large_set.erase(large_set.begin());
59 }
60
61 min_sum = std::min(min_sum, window_sum); // Update the minimum sum found
62 }
63
64 // The result is the minimum sum of 'k' elements from each window plus the first element
65 return nums[0] + min_sum;
66 }
67};
68
1// Import the necessary collection class
2import { MultiSet } from "typescript-collections";
3
4// This function calculates the minimum sum of 'k' elements from each consecutive window of 'dist + 1' elements in the 'nums' array.
5function minimumCost(nums: number[], k: number, dist: number): bigint {
6 // The smallSet keeps the smallest 'k-1' elements, and the largeSet keeps the others.
7 const smallSet = new MultiSet<number>();
8 const largeSet = new MultiSet<number>();
9 const windowSize = dist + 1;
10 let windowSum: bigint = BigInt(0); // Sum of the smallest 'k' elements in the current window.
11 let minSum: bigint = BigInt(0); // Minimum sum found of 'k' elements across all windows.
12
13 // Initialize the first window
14 for (let i = 1; i <= windowSize; i++) {
15 smallSet.add(nums[i]);
16 windowSum += BigInt(nums[i]);
17 }
18
19 // Ensure smallSet only has 'k-1' smallest values
20 while (smallSet.size() > k - 1) {
21 largeSet.add(smallSet.higherElementsFirst()[0]);
22 windowSum -= BigInt(smallSet.higherElementsFirst()[0]);
23 smallSet.remove(smallSet.higherElementsFirst()[0]);
24 }
25 minSum = windowSum;
26
27 // Slide the window across the array
28 for (let i = windowSize + 1; i < nums.length; i++) {
29 windowSum += BigInt(nums[i]);
30 smallSet.add(nums[i]);
31
32 // Maintain the two multisets by moving the distanced element to the correct set
33 if (largeSet.contains(nums[i - windowSize])) {
34 largeSet.remove(nums[i - windowSize]);
35 } else {
36 windowSum -= BigInt(nums[i - windowSize]);
37 smallSet.remove(nums[i - windowSize]);
38 }
39
40 // Maintain the size of the smallSet ('k-1' elements)
41 while (smallSet.size() > k - 1) {
42 windowSum -= BigInt(smallSet.higherElementsFirst()[0]);
43 largeSet.add(smallSet.higherElementsFirst()[0]);
44 smallSet.remove(smallSet.higherElementsFirst()[0]);
45 }
46
47 // Populate smallSet if it has fewer than 'k-1' elements by taking from largeSet
48 while (smallSet.size() < k - 1) {
49 windowSum += BigInt(largeSet.lowerElementsFirst()[0]);
50 smallSet.add(largeSet.lowerElementsFirst()[0]);
51 largeSet.remove(largeSet.lowerElementsFirst()[0]);
52 }
53
54 // Balance the sets so the elements in smallSet are actually smaller than those in largeSet
55 while (smallSet.size() > 0 && largeSet.size() > 0 && smallSet.higherElementsFirst()[0] > largeSet.lowerElementsFirst()[0]) {
56 windowSum += BigInt(largeSet.lowerElementsFirst()[0]);
57 windowSum -= BigInt(smallSet.higherElementsFirst()[0]);
58 smallSet.add(largeSet.lowerElementsFirst()[0]);
59 largeSet.add(smallSet.higherElementsFirst()[0]);
60 smallSet.remove(smallSet.higherElementsFirst()[0]);
61 largeSet.remove(largeSet.lowerElementsFirst()[0]);
62 }
63
64 minSum = windowSum < minSum ? windowSum : minSum; // Update the minimum sum found
65 }
66
67 // The result is the minimum sum of 'k' elements from each window plus the first element
68 return BigInt(nums[0]) + minSum;
69}
70
71// You should also include the definitions for the MultiSet class or use an existing library
72// that implements this functionality.
73
Time and Space Complexity
Time Complexity
The processed time complexity of the code is primarily determined by the main loop that runs through all elements in the list nums
. Inside this loop, several operations are performed:
-
Searching for the appropriate insertion position for the element in the sorted list: This is done with
bisect.bisect_left(sl, nums[j])
, which runs inO(log K)
time, whereK
is the size of the sorted list, capped atk-1
. -
Adding an element to the sorted list: The
sl.add(nums[j])
operation also runs inO(log K)
because it maintains the sorted property. -
Updating the
running_sum
involves simple arithmetic operations, which isO(1)
. -
Removing elements and updating the
running_sum
when the subarray exceeds the specifieddist
. Removal of an element is done withsl.remove(removed_element)
, preceded by finding the index of the element to be removed usingsl.index(nums[i])
. Indexing runs inO(K)
time and removal runs inO(log K)
.
Given the loop runs n
times and K
can be at most k-1
, the total time complexity is O(n * (2*log(K) + K))
. Since K
is bounded by k-1
, we can simplify the expression to O(n * (log(k) + k))
.
Space Complexity
The space complexity is affected by:
-
The sorted list
sl
, which can contain at mostk-1+dist
elements (worst case scenario if all conditions never trigger a removal of elements before thedist
constraint applies). -
Internal variables used for iteration and computation.
The dominant factor here is the sorted list. Given it can hold up to k-1+dist
elements, the space complexity is O(K + dist)
. However, since K
is limited to k-1
, the space complexity simplifies to O(k + dist)
.
Learn more about how to find time and space complexity quickly using problem constraints.
In a binary min heap, the minimum element can be found in:
Recommended Readings
https algomonster s3 us east 2 amazonaws com cover_photos stack svg Sliding Window Maximum Monotonic Stack We have an array and a sliding window defined by a start index and an end index The sliding window moves from left of the array to right There are always k elements in
https algomonster s3 us east 2 amazonaws com cover_photos heap svg Priority Queue and Heap What is the relationship between priority queue and heap Priority Queue is an Abstract Data Type and Heap is the concrete data structure we use to implement a priority queue Priority Queue A priority queue
LeetCode Patterns Your Personal Dijkstra's Algorithm to Landing Your Dream Job The goal of AlgoMonster is to help you get a job in the shortest amount of time possible in a data driven way We compiled datasets of tech interview problems and broke them down by patterns This way we
Want a Structured Path to Master System Design Too? Don’t Miss This!