553. Optimal Division
Problem Description
You have an integer array nums
where the elements will be divided sequentially from left to right using floating-point division.
For example, given nums = [2,3,4]
, the default evaluation would be 2/3/4
, which calculates as (2/3)/4 = 0.667/4 = 0.167
.
You can add parentheses anywhere in the expression to change the order of operations. The goal is to strategically place parentheses to maximize the final result.
For instance, with nums = [2,3,4]
:
- Default:
2/3/4 = 0.167
- With parentheses:
2/(3/4) = 2/0.75 = 2.667
Your task is to return the expression as a string that produces the maximum possible value. The expression should not contain unnecessary parentheses.
Key observations:
- Division operations are performed left to right by default
- Adding parentheses changes the evaluation order
- The result should be a valid mathematical expression in string format
- Redundant parentheses should be avoided
The solution recognizes that to maximize the result of a division chain, you want to minimize the denominator. Since a/(b/c/d/...)
equals a*c*d*...)/b
, the optimal strategy is to place all elements after the first one in parentheses (except for edge cases with 1 or 2 elements).
Intuition
Let's think about what happens when we divide numbers sequentially. When we have a/b/c
, this evaluates as (a/b)/c = a/(b*c)
. The key insight is that division by a product makes the result smaller.
To maximize our result, we want to make the denominator as small as possible. Consider a/b/c/d/...
:
- Without parentheses:
a/(b*c*d*...)
- If we group everything after
b
in parentheses:a/(b/(c/d/...))
When we have a/(b/(c/d))
, this actually equals a*(c/d)/b = (a*c)/(b*d)
. Notice how some terms moved to the numerator!
Let's trace through a concrete example with [6,2,3,4]
:
- Default:
6/2/3/4 = ((6/2)/3)/4 = (3/3)/4 = 1/4 = 0.25
- Optimal:
6/(2/3/4) = 6/((2/3)/4) = 6/(2/12) = 6*12/2 = 36
The pattern becomes clear: by putting parentheses around everything after the first division, we effectively flip many divisions into multiplications. Specifically, a/(b/c/d/...)
becomes a*c*d*...)/b
, maximizing our result.
This leads to the simple strategy:
- For 1 number: just return it
- For 2 numbers:
a/b
(no choice in arrangement) - For 3+ numbers:
a/(b/c/d/...)
where we group all numbers after the first into parentheses
The mathematical reasoning is that we're converting as many division operations as possible into multiplication operations in the numerator, keeping only one division by the second number.
Learn more about Math and Dynamic Programming patterns.
Solution Approach
The implementation is straightforward once we understand the optimal strategy. We handle three distinct cases based on the length of the input array:
Case 1: Single element (n == 1
)
- Simply return the number as a string
- No division operations needed
- Example:
[5]
returns"5"
Case 2: Two elements (n == 2
)
- Return the expression with a single division
- Format:
"a/b"
- Example:
[6,2]
returns"6/2"
Case 3: Three or more elements (n >= 3
)
- Apply the optimal parenthesization strategy
- Place the first number as the numerator
- Group all remaining numbers in parentheses as the denominator
- Format:
"a/(b/c/d/...)"
- Example:
[6,2,3,4]
returns"6/(2/3/4)"
The implementation uses Python's string formatting and the join()
method for clean string construction:
def optimalDivision(self, nums: List[int]) -> str:
n = len(nums)
if n == 1:
return str(nums[0])
if n == 2:
return f'{nums[0]}/{nums[1]}'
return f'{nums[0]}/({"/".join(map(str, nums[1:]))})'
The key components:
str(nums[0])
: Converts the single element to stringf'{nums[0]}/{nums[1]}'
: Uses f-string formatting for two elements"/".join(map(str, nums[1:]))
: Converts all elements after the first to strings and joins them with "/"- The outer parentheses in the third case ensure proper grouping
This solution runs in O(n)
time complexity for string construction and O(n)
space complexity for the output string.
Ready to land your dream job?
Unlock your dream job with a 3-minute evaluator for a personalized learning plan!
Start EvaluatorExample Walkthrough
Let's walk through the solution with nums = [12, 4, 2]
to illustrate why our approach maximizes the result.
Step 1: Understand the default evaluation Without parentheses, division evaluates left to right:
12/4/2 = (12/4)/2 = 3/2 = 1.5
Step 2: Explore alternative parenthesizations We could place parentheses in different ways:
- Option A:
12/(4/2) = 12/2 = 6
✓ - Option B:
(12/4)/2 = 3/2 = 1.5
(same as default)
Step 3: Apply our solution strategy
Since we have 3 elements (n ≥ 3), we use the pattern a/(b/c/...)
:
- Place the first number (
12
) as the numerator - Group remaining numbers (
4/2
) in parentheses as the denominator - Result:
"12/(4/2)"
Step 4: Verify this is optimal
Let's see why 12/(4/2)
gives the maximum value:
4/2 = 2
(evaluate the denominator first)12/2 = 6
(divide the numerator by the result)
Mathematically, 12/(4/2)
is equivalent to 12 * 2/4 = 24/4 = 6
. Notice how the last number (2) effectively moved to the numerator through the parenthesization!
Step 5: Code execution
nums = [12, 4, 2]
n = len(nums) # n = 3
# Since n >= 3, we use the third case:
result = f'{nums[0]}/({"/".join(map(str, nums[1:]))})'
# nums[0] = 12
# nums[1:] = [4, 2]
# "/".join(map(str, [4, 2])) = "4/2"
# result = "12/(4/2)"
The solution correctly returns "12/(4/2)"
which evaluates to 6, the maximum possible value.
Solution Implementation
1class Solution:
2 def optimalDivision(self, nums: List[int]) -> str:
3 """
4 Given an array of positive integers, return a string representation
5 of the optimal division that maximizes the result.
6
7 The key insight: To maximize a/b/c/d..., we want to minimize the denominator.
8 Since all numbers are positive, the optimal solution is always a/(b/c/d/...)
9 which equals a*c*d*.../(b), maximizing the result.
10
11 Args:
12 nums: List of positive integers to divide
13
14 Returns:
15 String representation of the optimal division with parentheses
16 """
17 n = len(nums)
18
19 # Base case: single number, no division needed
20 if n == 1:
21 return str(nums[0])
22
23 # Base case: two numbers, simple division without parentheses
24 if n == 2:
25 return f"{nums[0]}/{nums[1]}"
26
27 # For 3+ numbers: place all numbers after the first in parentheses
28 # This ensures they become the denominator of the denominator,
29 # effectively making them part of the numerator
30 denominator_part = "/".join(map(str, nums[1:]))
31 return f"{nums[0]}/({denominator_part})"
32
1class Solution {
2 /**
3 * Finds the optimal way to add parentheses in a division expression to maximize the result.
4 *
5 * The key insight: For an expression a/b/c/d..., to maximize the result,
6 * we want to minimize the denominator. This is achieved by making everything
7 * after the first number into one group: a/(b/c/d...)
8 *
9 * @param nums Array of integers representing the division expression
10 * @return String representation of the optimal division with parentheses
11 */
12 public String optimalDivision(int[] nums) {
13 int length = nums.length;
14
15 // Base case: single number
16 if (length == 1) {
17 return String.valueOf(nums[0]);
18 }
19
20 // Base case: two numbers, no parentheses needed
21 if (length == 2) {
22 return nums[0] + "/" + nums[1];
23 }
24
25 // For three or more numbers: a/(b/c/d/...)
26 // Start building the result with first number and opening parenthesis
27 StringBuilder result = new StringBuilder();
28 result.append(nums[0]).append("/(");
29
30 // Add all middle numbers with division operators
31 for (int i = 1; i < length - 1; i++) {
32 result.append(nums[i]).append("/");
33 }
34
35 // Add the last number and closing parenthesis
36 result.append(nums[length - 1]).append(")");
37
38 return result.toString();
39 }
40}
41
1class Solution {
2public:
3 string optimalDivision(vector<int>& nums) {
4 // Get the size of the input array
5 int n = nums.size();
6
7 // Base case: single number, just return it as string
8 if (n == 1) {
9 return to_string(nums[0]);
10 }
11
12 // Base case: two numbers, return simple division without parentheses
13 if (n == 2) {
14 return to_string(nums[0]) + "/" + to_string(nums[1]);
15 }
16
17 // For more than 2 numbers, maximize result by placing parentheses
18 // around all numbers after the first one
19 // This ensures nums[0] is divided by the smallest possible value
20 // Format: nums[0]/(nums[1]/nums[2]/.../nums[n-1])
21
22 // Start building the result string with first number and opening parenthesis
23 string result = to_string(nums[0]) + "/(";
24
25 // Add all middle numbers with division operators
26 for (int i = 1; i < n - 1; i++) {
27 result.append(to_string(nums[i]) + "/");
28 }
29
30 // Add the last number and closing parenthesis
31 result.append(to_string(nums[n - 1]) + ")");
32
33 return result;
34 }
35};
36
1/**
2 * Finds the optimal way to add parentheses in a division expression to maximize the result
3 * @param nums - Array of positive integers to be divided in sequence
4 * @returns String representation of the division expression with optimal parentheses placement
5 */
6function optimalDivision(nums: number[]): string {
7 // Get the length of the input array
8 const arrayLength: number = nums.length;
9
10 // Create the initial division expression by joining all numbers with '/'
11 const divisionExpression: string = nums.join('/');
12
13 // For arrays with more than 2 elements, add parentheses around all divisors
14 // This maximizes the result by converting divisions into multiplications
15 // Example: a/(b/c/d) = a * (d/(b*c)) which is larger than a/b/c/d
16 if (arrayLength > 2) {
17 // Find the position after the first division operator
18 const firstDivisionIndex: number = divisionExpression.indexOf('/') + 1;
19
20 // Add parentheses around everything after the first division
21 return `${divisionExpression.slice(0, firstDivisionIndex)}(${divisionExpression.slice(firstDivisionIndex)})`;
22 }
23
24 // For arrays with 1 or 2 elements, return the expression as-is
25 // No parentheses needed since there's only one way to evaluate
26 return divisionExpression;
27}
28
Time and Space Complexity
Time Complexity: O(n)
- The algorithm performs a constant amount of work for checking the length
n
of the input list. - For
n = 1
orn = 2
, it returns immediately withO(1)
operations. - For
n > 2
, the main operation is"/".join(map(str, nums[1:]))
:nums[1:]
creates a slice containingn-1
elements:O(n-1)
map(str, nums[1:])
converts each of then-1
elements to strings:O(n-1)
"/".join(...)
concatenatesn-1
strings with "/" separators:O(n-1)
- The string formatting operation combines the results:
O(n)
- Overall time complexity:
O(n)
Space Complexity: O(n)
- The slice
nums[1:]
creates a new list withn-1
elements:O(n-1)
- The
map
operation andjoin
create intermediate string representations:O(n-1)
- The final result string has length proportional to the number of elements and their digit representations:
O(n)
- Overall space complexity:
O(n)
Learn more about how to find time and space complexity quickly.
Common Pitfalls
1. Attempting Complex Dynamic Programming or Recursion
Many developers instinctively reach for dynamic programming when they see "maximize" in the problem statement, leading to unnecessarily complex solutions that try to evaluate all possible parenthesization combinations.
Why it's a pitfall: The mathematical insight that a/(b/c/d...) = (a*c*d...)/(b)
means there's always one optimal solution pattern, making DP overkill.
Solution: Recognize the mathematical pattern first. Since we're maximizing a division chain with positive numbers, we want to minimize the denominator, which is achieved by the specific parenthesization pattern a/(b/c/d...)
.
2. Adding Unnecessary Parentheses
A common mistake is adding parentheses in cases where they're not needed, such as:
- Wrapping single numbers:
"(5)"
instead of"5"
- Adding parentheses for two-element arrays:
"6/(2)"
instead of"6/2"
- Over-parenthesizing:
"(6)/((2/3/4))"
instead of"6/(2/3/4)"
Why it's a pitfall: The problem explicitly states to avoid redundant parentheses, and unnecessary parentheses make the expression harder to read.
Solution: Only add parentheses when they change the evaluation order:
if n == 2:
return f"{nums[0]}/{nums[1]}" # No parentheses needed
if n >= 3:
return f"{nums[0]}/({'/'.join(map(str, nums[1:]))})" # Parentheses required
3. Incorrect String Concatenation
Developers might incorrectly build the string, especially when dealing with the denominator part:
# Wrong approaches:
result = str(nums[0]) + "/(" + str(nums[1:]) + ")" # Outputs array representation
result = f"{nums[0]}/({nums[1:]})" # Outputs list format, not division chain
Why it's a pitfall: These approaches don't properly format the array elements as a division chain.
Solution: Use join()
with map()
to properly convert and format:
denominator_part = "/".join(map(str, nums[1:])) # Converts each number to string and joins with "/"
4. Forgetting Edge Cases
Not handling arrays with 1 or 2 elements properly, attempting to apply the general pattern to all cases:
# Wrong: Applying the same pattern to all cases
def optimalDivision(nums):
return f"{nums[0]}/({'/'.join(map(str, nums[1:]))})"
# This fails for single elements and adds unnecessary parentheses for two elements
Why it's a pitfall: Single-element arrays have no division, and two-element arrays don't benefit from parentheses.
Solution: Explicitly handle different array sizes:
n = len(nums)
if n == 1:
return str(nums[0])
if n == 2:
return f"{nums[0]}/{nums[1]}"
# Only then apply the parenthesization pattern
Which of the following uses divide and conquer strategy?
Recommended Readings
Math for Technical Interviews How much math do I need to know for technical interviews The short answer is about high school level math Computer science is often associated with math and some universities even place their computer science department under the math faculty However the reality is that you
What is Dynamic Programming Prerequisite DFS problems dfs_intro Backtracking problems backtracking Memoization problems memoization_intro Pruning problems backtracking_pruning Dynamic programming is an algorithmic optimization technique that breaks down a complicated problem into smaller overlapping sub problems in a recursive manner and uses solutions to the sub problems to construct a solution
Coding Interview Patterns Your Personal Dijkstra's Algorithm to Landing Your Dream Job The goal of AlgoMonster is to help you get a job in the shortest amount of time possible in a data driven way We compiled datasets of tech interview problems and broke them down by patterns This way
Want a Structured Path to Master System Design Too? Don’t Miss This!