2225. Find Players With Zero or One Losses
Problem Description
The problem provides you with an integer array matches
, where each element represents the outcome of a match as [winner_i, loser_i]
. The task is to find all players who have not lost any matches and all players who have lost exactly one match, ensuring that all listed players have participated in at least one match.
Here's how you need to organize the output:
- The first list (
answer[0]
) should contain all players who have never lost a match. - The second list (
answer[1]
) should include all players who have lost exactly one match.
It's important to list the players in ascending order. If a player does not appear in the matches
array, they are not considered since no match records for them exist. Additionally, players will not lose more than one match because match outcomes are unique.
Intuition
The intuition behind the solution is to track the number of losses for each player. This is achievable by counting the occurrences of each player in the loser position of every match.
To do this systematically, we can use the following steps:
- Utilize a
Counter
to keep a tally of the losses for each player. - Iterate over the
matches
list, incrementing the count for losers. If a player wins a match, ensure they're in theCounter
with a loss count of 0 (since winning means they have not lost that match). - After processing all matches, go through the Counter and categorize players based on their loss count.
- Players with 0 losses go into
answer[0]
. - Players with exactly 1 loss go into
answer[1]
.
- Players with 0 losses go into
- Sort both lists to satisfy the ascending order requirement.
- Return the sorted lists as the final result.
Using the Counter
, we abstract the complexity of tracking individual losses and make it simple to determine which list a player belongs to based on their number of losses after processing all match outcomes.
Learn more about Sorting patterns.
Solution Approach
The solution's implementation follows an efficient approach to categorize players based on their match outcomes:
-
A
Counter
object is utilized to maintain the tally of losses for each player. This data structure is optimal for this purpose because it allows us to keep track of how many times each player appears as the loser and does not count their wins. -
Iterate through the
matches
list, and for each match[winner, loser]
:- Check if the
winner
is already in theCounter
. If not, initialize their loss count to 0 because winning a match implies they haven't lost it. - Increment the
loser
's count by one to signify their loss in this match.
- Check if the
-
After tallying the losses for each player, create a two-dimensional list
ans
, whereans[0]
will eventually contain players with 0 losses, andans[1]
will contain players with exactly one loss. -
Iterate through the items in the
Counter
(for u, v in cnt.items():
). For each player (u
) and their loss count (v
):- If
v
is less than 2 (meaning the player has either won all their matches or lost just one), add the player toans[v]
. This works becausev
can only be 0 or 1, as we are only interested in players with no losses or exactly one loss.
- If
-
The lists need to be sorted in increasing order, as per the problem specifications. Thus, both
ans[0]
andans[1]
are sorted using thesort()
method. -
Finally, return the list
ans
as the result, whereans[0]
contains all players that have not lost any matches andans[1]
contains all players that have lost exactly one match.
This algorithm efficiently uses a hash map (provided by Counter
in Python) to count occurrences, which is ideal for frequency counting tasks. The overall time complexity of the algorithm is determined by the number of matches and the sorting step, and the space complexity is largely influenced by the Counter
used to store losses per player.
Ready to land your dream job?
Unlock your dream job with a 2-minute evaluator for a personalized learning plan!
Start EvaluatorExample Walkthrough
Let's go through a small example to illustrate the solution approach. Assume we have the following matches
array:
matches = [[1, 3], [2, 1], [4, 2], [5, 2]]
In this array, the subarrays represent match outcomes with winners and losers respectively.
-
Initialize a
Counter
to count losses:- After initializing:
Counter({})
- After initializing:
-
Start iterating through
matches
:- Match
[1, 3]
:Counter({'3': 1})
- Match
[2, 1]
:Counter({'3': 1, '1': 1})
- Before proceeding with the loser of the next match, ensure that winner
4
has a loss count of 0:Counter({'3': 1, '1': 1, '4': 0})
- Match
[4, 2]
:Counter({'3': 1, '1': 1, '2': 1, '4': 0})
- Again, ensure that winner
5
has a loss count of 0 before the next loser is processed:Counter({'3': 1, '1': 1, '2': 1, '4': 0, '5': 0})
- Match
[5, 2]
:Counter({'3': 1, '1': 1, '2': 2, '4': 0, '5': 0})
- Match
-
Now we have all loss counts, create list
ans
with two sublists for 0 losses and 1 loss:ans = [[], []]
-
Iterate through the counts and populate
ans
accordingly:- Player
3
has 1 loss:ans = [[], [3]]
- Player
1
has 1 loss:ans = [[], [3, 1]]
- Player
4
has 0 losses:ans = [[4], [3, 1]]
- Player
5
has 0 losses:ans = [[4, 5], [3, 1]]
- Player
2
is not added to either sublist since they've lost more than one match.
- Player
-
Sort both
ans[0]
andans[1]
as required:ans[0].sort()
:ans = [[4, 5], [3, 1]]
ans[1].sort()
:ans = [[4, 5], [1, 3]]
-
The final sorted
ans
list is returned from the function:
ans = [[4, 5], [1, 3]]
This holds our result, where ans[0]
contains players 4
and 5
who have never lost any matches, and ans[1]
contains players 1
and 3
who have lost exactly one match, listed in ascending order.
Solution Implementation
1from collections import Counter
2
3class Solution:
4 def findWinners(self, matches):
5 count_losses = Counter()
6
7 # Count the number of losses for each player
8 for winner, loser in matches:
9 # Ensure winners with no losses are accounted for
10 if winner not in count_losses:
11 count_losses[winner] = 0
12
13 # Increment the loss count for losers
14 count_losses[loser] += 1
15
16 winners_with_zero_losses = []
17 winners_with_one_loss = []
18
19 # Iterate over the players and their loss counts
20 for player, loss_count in count_losses.items():
21 # If a player has 0 losses, add them to the winners_with_zero_losses list
22 if loss_count == 0:
23 winners_with_zero_losses.append(player)
24 # If a player has exactly 1 loss, add them to the winners_with_one_loss list
25 elif loss_count == 1:
26 winners_with_one_loss.append(player)
27
28 # Sort the lists to meet the output criteria
29 winners_with_zero_losses.sort()
30 winners_with_one_loss.sort()
31
32 # Combine the two lists into a single list of lists for the result
33 result = [winners_with_zero_losses, winners_with_one_loss]
34 return result
35
1import java.util.ArrayList;
2import java.util.HashMap;
3import java.util.List;
4import java.util.Map;
5import java.util.Collections;
6
7class Solution {
8 public List<List<Integer>> findWinners(int[][] matches) {
9 // A map to keep track of loss counts for each player
10 Map<Integer, Integer> lossCountMap = new HashMap<>();
11 // Process all match results
12 for (int[] match : matches) {
13 int winner = match[0];
14 int loser = match[1];
15 // Initialize the winner's loss count if not already present in map
16 lossCountMap.putIfAbsent(winner, 0);
17 // Increment the loss count for the loser
18 lossCountMap.put(loser, lossCountMap.getOrDefault(loser, 0) + 1);
19 }
20
21 // Create the result list containing two lists: one for all the players who have never lost, and one for the players who have lost exactly once
22 List<List<Integer>> winnersList = new ArrayList<>();
23 winnersList.add(new ArrayList<>());
24 winnersList.add(new ArrayList<>());
25
26
27 // Iterate through each entry in the loss count map
28 for (Map.Entry<Integer, Integer> entry : lossCountMap.entrySet()) {
29 int player = entry.getKey();
30 int losses = entry.getValue();
31 // If the player has lost fewer than 2 matches, include them in the appropriate sublist (0 losses or 1 loss)
32 if (losses < 2) {
33 winnersList.get(losses).add(player);
34 }
35 }
36
37 // Sort the sublists of players with 0 losses and exactly 1 loss
38 Collections.sort(winnersList.get(0));
39 Collections.sort(winnersList.get(1));
40
41 // Return the result list
42 return winnersList;
43 }
44}
45
1#include <vector>
2#include <unordered_map>
3#include <algorithm>
4
5class Solution {
6public:
7 // Function to find the players who have never lost a match (winners)
8 // and those who have lost exactly one match (one-match-losers)
9 vector<vector<int>> findWinners(vector<vector<int>>& matches) {
10 unordered_map<int, int> lossCount; // Map storing the loss count for each player
11
12 // Process each match result and update the loss count for the players
13 for (auto& match : matches) {
14 int winner = match[0];
15 int loser = match[1];
16
17 // Make sure every player is included in the map
18 if (!lossCount.count(winner)) {
19 lossCount[winner] = 0;
20 }
21
22 // Increment the loss count for the loser of the match
23 ++lossCount[loser];
24 }
25
26 vector<vector<int>> answer(2); // To hold the final result
27
28 // Iterate through the map to classify players based on their loss counts
29 for (auto& playerLossPair : lossCount) {
30 int player = playerLossPair.first;
31 int losses = playerLossPair.second;
32
33 // If the player has less than 2 losses, add them to the respective list
34 if (losses < 2) {
35 answer[losses].push_back(player);
36 }
37 }
38
39 // Sort the list of winners and one-match-losers
40 sort(answer[0].begin(), answer[0].end());
41 sort(answer[1].begin(), answer[1].end());
42
43 return answer; // Return the sorted lists
44 }
45};
46
1// Import statements are not required in TypeScript for data structures like arrays and maps.
2
3// Type Alias for readability, representing a match result with winner and loser.
4type MatchResult = [number, number];
5
6// Function to update the loss count map with match results
7function processMatch(lossCount: Map<number, number>, winner: number, loser: number): void {
8 // Ensure every player is present in the map; if not add them with zero losses
9 if (!lossCount.has(winner)) {
10 lossCount.set(winner, 0);
11 }
12
13 // Increment the loss count for the loser of the match
14 const currentLossCount = lossCount.get(loser) || 0;
15 lossCount.set(loser, currentLossCount + 1);
16}
17
18// Function to sort and categorize players based on their loss counts into winners and one-match-losers
19function findWinners(matches: MatchResult[]): number[][] {
20 const lossCount: Map<number, number> = new Map(); // Map to store the loss count for each player
21
22 // Process each match result and update the loss count for the players
23 for (const match of matches) {
24 const [winner, loser] = match;
25 processMatch(lossCount, winner, loser);
26 }
27
28 // Arrays to hold the list of players who never lost and those who lost exactly one match
29 const winners: number[] = [];
30 const oneMatchLosers: number[] = [];
31
32 // Iterate through the map to classify players based on their loss counts
33 for (const [player, losses] of lossCount) {
34 // If the player has no losses, they are a winner. If only one loss, they are a one-match-loser.
35 if (losses === 0) {
36 winners.push(player);
37 } else if (losses === 1) {
38 oneMatchLosers.push(player);
39 }
40 }
41
42 // Sort the list of winners and one-match-losers
43 winners.sort((a, b) => a - b);
44 oneMatchLosers.sort((a, b) => a - b);
45
46 // Return the sorted lists as a 2D array
47 return [winners, oneMatchLosers];
48}
49
50// Usage of the findWinners function can be demonstrated with an example:
51const matchResults: MatchResult[] = [
52 [1, 3],
53 [2, 3],
54 [3, 6],
55 [5, 6],
56 [5, 7]
57];
58const results = findWinners(matchResults);
59console.log(`Winners: ${results[0]}, One-Match Losers: ${results[1]}`);
60
Time and Space Complexity
The given Python code seeks to find all players who never lost a game (who are undefeated), and all players who lost exactly one game. Let's break down its time and space complexity.
Time Complexity
-
Creating the counter:
O(N)
- Creating the counter object requires iterating over the list of matches whereN
is the number of matches. -
Initializing player counts:
O(N)
- We iterate through all matches, and for each match we perform a check and counter increment which operates in constant time, resulting inO(N)
. -
Traversing the counter for players with losses less than 2:
O(P)
- We go through the counter which containsP
unique players. -
Sorting winners and players with one loss:
O(PlogP)
- Sorting is performed on the players' list for those who have not lost and those who have lost one match. In the worst case, all players could either be winners or have one loss, hence the sorting can beO(PlogP)
forP
unique players.
The overall time complexity is the sum of these operations, dominated by the sorting steps: O(N) + O(P) + O(PlogP)
. Since the sorting term is usually the most significant for large lists, we can simplify this expression to:
O(PlogP)
.
Space Complexity
-
Counter object:
O(P)
- The counter object holds at mostP
unique players, which is the space required. -
Answer List:
O(P)
- The answer list is a list of two lists, which in the worst case would hold allP
players, resulting inO(P)
space.
The overall space complexity combines both aspects, remaining O(P)
since it is not multiplied by any factor.
Therefore, the final complexity of the provided code is:
- Time Complexity:
O(PlogP)
- Space Complexity:
O(P)
Learn more about how to find time and space complexity quickly using problem constraints.
How does merge sort divide the problem into subproblems?
Recommended Readings
Sorting Summary Comparisons We presented quite a few sorting algorithms and it is essential to know the advantages and disadvantages of each one The basic algorithms are easy to visualize and easy to learn for beginner programmers because of their simplicity As such they will suffice if you don't know any advanced
LeetCode Patterns Your Personal Dijkstra's Algorithm to Landing Your Dream Job The goal of AlgoMonster is to help you get a job in the shortest amount of time possible in a data driven way We compiled datasets of tech interview problems and broke them down by patterns This way we
Recursion Recursion is one of the most important concepts in computer science Simply speaking recursion is the process of a function calling itself Using a real life analogy imagine a scenario where you invite your friends to lunch https algomonster s3 us east 2 amazonaws com recursion jpg You first
Want a Structured Path to Master System Design Too? Don’t Miss This!