1115. Print FooBar Alternately
Problem Description
In this concurrency problem, we have a code snippet defining a class FooBar
with two methods: foo()
and bar()
. These methods print the strings "foo" and "bar", respectively, in a loop up to n
times. The challenge is to ensure that when these methods are called by two separate threads, the output is "foobar" repeated n
times, with "foo" and "bar" alternating properly.
To achieve this, we need to implement a mechanism that enforces the order of execution, such that the foo()
method must print "foo" before the bar()
method prints "bar," and this pattern is repeated for the entire loop.
Intuition
Concurrency problems often require synchronization techniques to ensure that multiple threads can work together without conflicts or race conditions. In this case, we need to make sure that "foo" is always printed before "bar."
The intuition behind the solution is to use semaphores—a classic synchronization primitive—to coordinate the actions of the threads. In the context of this problem, we use two semaphores: one that controls the printing of "foo" (self.f
) and one that controls the printing of "bar" (self.b
).
The self.f
semaphore is initially set to 1, allowing the foo()
method to print immediately. After printing, it releases the self.b
semaphore, which is initially set to 0, thus preventing bar()
from printing until foo()
is printed first. Once self.b
is released by foo()
, the bar()
method can print "bar" and then release the self.f
semaphore to allow the next "foo" to be printed. This alternating process continues until the loop completes n
times.
By carefully managing the states of the semaphores and ensuring that each method changes the semaphore state only after printing, we can achieve the desired ordering of prints, resulting in the correct output "foobar" repeated n
times.
Solution Approach
The solution utilizes the Semaphore
class from Python's threading
module as the primary synchronization mechanism, allowing us to enforce the strict alternation between foo
and bar
.
Here's a step-by-step explanation of the code implementation:
-
Initialization: The
FooBar
class is initialized with an integern
, which represents the number of times "foobar" should be printed. TwoSemaphore
objects are created:self.f
for "foo" with an initial value of 1, andself.b
for "bar" with an initial value of 0. The initial values are critical:self.f
is set to 1 to allowfoo()
to proceed immediately, andself.b
is set to 0 to blockbar()
untilfoo()
signals it by releasingself.b
. -
The
foo
Method:- It contains a loop that runs
n
times. - Each iteration begins with
self.f.acquire()
, which blocks if the semaphore's value is 0. Sinceself.f
is initialized to 1,foo()
can start immediately on the first iteration. - The
printFoo()
function is executed, printing "foo". - After printing "foo", the
self.b.release()
is called. This increments the count of theself.b
semaphore, signaling thebar()
method (if it is waiting) that it can proceed to print "bar".
- It contains a loop that runs
-
The
bar
Method:- It's also a loop running
n
times. - Each iteration starts by calling
self.b.acquire()
, which waits until theself.f
semaphore is released by a previousfoo()
call, ensuring that "foo" has been printed before "bar" can proceed. - Once the semaphore is acquired,
printBar()
is executed to print "bar". - After printing "bar", it invokes
self.f.release()
to increment the semaphore count forfoo
, allowing the next iteration offoo()
to print again, hence ensuring the sequence starts with "foo".
- It's also a loop running
This alternating semaphore pattern locks each method in a waiting state until the other method signals that it has finished its task by releasing the semaphore. Since acquire()
decreases the semaphore's value by 1 and release()
increases it by 1, this careful incrementing and decrementing of semaphore values guarantees that the print order is preserved and that the strings "foo" and "bar" are printed in the correct sequence to form "foobar" without getting mixed up or overwritten.
Ready to land your dream job?
Unlock your dream job with a 2-minute evaluator for a personalized learning plan!
Start EvaluatorExample Walkthrough
Let's walk through a simple example with n = 2
. We want our output to be "foobarfoobar" with "foo" always preceding "bar".
Here's how the synchronization using semaphores will facilitate this:
-
Initialization:
FooBar
object is created withn = 2
.- Semaphore
self.f
is set to 1 (unlocked), allowingfoo()
to be called immediately. - Semaphore
self.b
is set to 0 (locked), preventingbar()
from being called untilfoo()
is done.
-
First Iteration:
foo()
method is called by Thread 1.self.f.acquire()
is called, which succeeds immediately becauseself.f
is 1 (unlocked).printFoo()
is executed, so "foo" is printed.self.b.release()
is called, incrementingself.b
to 1, which unlocksbar()
.
bar()
method is called by Thread 2.self.b.acquire()
is called, which succeeds becauseself.b
was released byfoo()
.printBar()
is executed, printing "bar" after "foo".self.f.release()
is called, settingself.f
back to 1 (unlocked) and allowing the nextfoo()
to proceed.
-
Second Iteration:
- Again,
foo()
method is called by Thread 1.- This time, since
self.f
was released by the previousbar()
call,self.f.acquire()
succeeds again. printFoo()
is executed, and another "foo" is printed.self.b.release()
is called, incrementingself.b
and allowingbar()
to be called.
- This time, since
bar()
method is again called by Thread 2.- With
self.b
released,self.b.acquire()
allows the thread to proceed. printBar()
prints "bar", following the "foo" printed by the lastfoo()
call.- Finally,
self.f.release()
is called, although in this case, it's unnecessary because we've reached our loop condition (n
times) and no furtherfoo()
calls are needed.
- With
- Again,
By the end of the two iterations, we've successfully printed "foobarfoobar". Each foo()
preceded a bar()
thanks to our semaphore controls, and at no point could bar()
leapfrog ahead of foo()
. The semaphores effectively serialized access to the printing functions, ensuring the correct order despite the concurrent execution of threads.
Solution Implementation
1from threading import Semaphore
2from typing import Callable
3
4
5class FooBar:
6 def __init__(self, n: int):
7 self.n = n # Number of times "foo" and "bar" are to be printed.
8 # Semaphore for "foo" is initially unlocked.
9 self.sem_foo = Semaphore(1)
10 # Semaphore for "bar" is initially locked.
11 self.sem_bar = Semaphore(0)
12
13 def foo(self, print_foo: Callable[[], None]) -> None:
14 """Print "foo" n times, ensuring it alternates with "bar"."""
15 for _ in range(self.n):
16 self.sem_foo.acquire() # Wait for semaphore to be unlocked.
17 print_foo() # Provided print function for "foo".
18 self.sem_bar.release() # Unlock semaphore for "bar".
19
20 def bar(self, print_bar: Callable[[], None]) -> None:
21 """Print "bar" n times, ensuring it alternates with "foo"."""
22 for _ in range(self.n):
23 self.sem_bar.acquire() # Wait for semaphore to be unlocked.
24 print_bar() # Provided print function for "bar".
25 self.sem_foo.release() # Unlock semaphore for "foo".
26
1class FooBar {
2 private final int loopCount; // The number of times "foo" and "bar" should be printed.
3 private final Semaphore fooSemaphore = new Semaphore(1); // A semaphore for "foo", allowing "foo" to print first.
4 private final Semaphore barSemaphore = new Semaphore(0); // A semaphore for "bar", initially locked until "foo" is printed.
5
6 public FooBar(int n) {
7 this.loopCount = n;
8 }
9
10 // The method for printing "foo"
11 public void foo(Runnable printFoo) throws InterruptedException {
12 for (int i = 0; i < loopCount; i++) {
13 fooSemaphore.acquire(); // Acquire a permit before printing "foo", ensuring "foo" has the turn to print
14 printFoo.run(); // Output "foo"
15 barSemaphore.release(); // Release a permit for "bar" after "foo" is printed, allowing "bar" to print next
16 }
17 }
18
19 // The method for printing "bar"
20 public void bar(Runnable printBar) throws InterruptedException {
21 for (int i = 0; i < loopCount; i++) {
22 barSemaphore.acquire(); // Acquire a permit before printing "bar", ensuring "bar" has the turn to print
23 printBar.run(); // Output "bar"
24 fooSemaphore.release(); // Release a permit for "foo" after "bar" is printed, allowing "foo" to print next
25 }
26 }
27}
28
1#include <semaphore.h>
2#include <functional>
3
4class FooBar {
5private:
6 int n_; // The number of times to print "foobar"
7 sem_t sem_foo_, sem_bar_; // Semaphores used to coordinate the printing order
8
9public:
10 // Constructor that initializes the semaphores and count
11 FooBar(int n) : n_(n) {
12 // Initialize sem_foo_ with a count of 1 to allow "foo" to print first
13 sem_init(&sem_foo_, 0, 1);
14 // Initialize sem_bar_ with a count of 0 to block "bar" until "foo" is printed
15 sem_init(&sem_bar_, 0, 0);
16 }
17
18 // Deconstructor that destroys the semaphores
19 ~FooBar() {
20 sem_destroy(&sem_foo_);
21 sem_destroy(&sem_bar_);
22 }
23
24 // Method for printing "foo"
25 void foo(std::function<void()> printFoo) {
26 for (int i = 0; i < n_; ++i) {
27 // Wait on sem_foo_ to ensure "foo" is printed first
28 sem_wait(&sem_foo_);
29 // printFoo() calls the provided lambda function to output "foo"
30 printFoo();
31 // Post (increment) sem_bar_ to allow "bar" to be printed next
32 sem_post(&sem_bar_);
33 }
34 }
35
36 // Method for printing "bar"
37 void bar(std::function<void()> printBar) {
38 for (int i = 0; i < n_; ++i) {
39 // Wait on sem_bar_ to ensure "bar" is printed after "foo"
40 sem_wait(&sem_bar_);
41 // printBar() calls the provided lambda function to output "bar"
42 printBar();
43 // Post (increment) sem_foo_ to allow the next "foo" to be printed
44 sem_post(&sem_foo_);
45 }
46 }
47};
48
1// The number of times to print "foo" and "bar"
2let n: number;
3// Promises and callbacks for signaling
4let canPrintFoo: (() => void) | null = null;
5let canPrintBar: (() => void) | null = null;
6// Deferred promise resolvers
7let fooPromiseResolver: (() => void) | null = null;
8let barPromiseResolver: (() => void) | null = null;
9
10/**
11 * Initializes the synchronization primitives.
12 * @param {number} count - The number of iterations to run the sequence.
13 */
14function initFooBar(count: number): void {
15 n = count;
16 // Start with the ability to print "foo"
17 canPrintFoo = (() => {
18 fooPromiseResolver = null;
19 if (canPrintBar) canPrintBar();
20 });
21 // Prevent "bar" from printing until "foo" is printed
22 canPrintBar = null;
23}
24
25/**
26 * Prints "foo" to the console or another output.
27 * @param {() => void} printFoo - A callback function that prints "foo".
28 */
29async function foo(printFoo: () => void): Promise<void> {
30 for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
31 await new Promise<void>((resolve) => {
32 fooPromiseResolver = resolve;
33 if (canPrintFoo) canPrintFoo();
34 });
35 // The provided callback prints "foo"
36 printFoo();
37 // Allow "bar" to be printed
38 canPrintBar = (() => {
39 barPromiseResolver = null;
40 if (fooPromiseResolver) fooPromiseResolver();
41 });
42 // Block until 'bar' is printed
43 canPrintFoo = null;
44 }
45}
46
47/**
48 * Prints "bar" to the console or another output.
49 * @param {() => void} printBar - A callback function that prints "bar".
50 */
51async function bar(printBar: () => void): Promise<void> {
52 for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
53 await new Promise<void>((resolve) => {
54 barPromiseResolver = resolve;
55 if (canPrintBar) canPrintBar();
56 });
57 // The provided callback prints "bar"
58 printBar();
59 // Allow "foo" to be printed again
60 canPrintFoo = (() => {
61 fooPromiseResolver = null;
62 if (barPromiseResolver) barPromiseResolver();
63 });
64 // Block until 'foo' is printed again
65 canPrintBar = null;
66 }
67}
68
69// Example usage:
70initFooBar(3); // Initialize printing "foo" and "bar" three times each
71foo(() => console.log('foo'));
72bar(() => console.log('bar'));
73
Time and Space Complexity
Time Complexity
The time complexity of the FooBar
class methods foo
and bar
are both O(n)
. Each method contains a loop that iterates n
times, where n
is the input that represents the number of times the "foo" and "bar" functions should be called, respectively. The methods invoke acquire
and release
on semaphores, but the acquire/release operations are constant-time O(1)
operations, assuming that there is no contention (which should not happen here given the strict alternation). The printFoo
and printBar
functions are also called n
times each, and if we consider these functions to have O(1)
time complexity, which is a reasonable assumption for a simple print operation, then this does not change the overall time complexity of the foo
and bar
methods.
Space Complexity
The space complexity of the FooBar
class is O(1)
since the space required does not grow with n
. The class maintains fixed resources: two semaphores and one integer variable. No additional space is allocated that would scale with the input n
, meaning that the memory usage is constant irrespective of the size of n
.
Learn more about how to find time and space complexity quickly using problem constraints.
Which data structure is used in a depth first search?
Recommended Readings
LeetCode Patterns Your Personal Dijkstra's Algorithm to Landing Your Dream Job The goal of AlgoMonster is to help you get a job in the shortest amount of time possible in a data driven way We compiled datasets of tech interview problems and broke them down by patterns This way we
Recursion Recursion is one of the most important concepts in computer science Simply speaking recursion is the process of a function calling itself Using a real life analogy imagine a scenario where you invite your friends to lunch https algomonster s3 us east 2 amazonaws com recursion jpg You first
Runtime Overview When learning about algorithms and data structures you'll frequently encounter the term time complexity This concept is fundamental in computer science and offers insights into how long an algorithm takes to complete given a certain input size What is Time Complexity Time complexity represents the amount of time