3424. Minimum Cost to Make Arrays Identical
Problem Description
You are given two integer arrays arr
and brr
of length n
, and an integer k
. You can perform the following operations on arr
any number of times:
- Split
arr
into any number of contiguous subarrays and rearrange these subarrays in any order. This operation has a fixed cost ofk
. - Choose any element in
arr
and add or subtract a positive integerx
to it. The cost of this operation isx
.
Return the minimum total cost to make arr
equal to brr
.
Intuition
The primary goal is to make the elements of arr
equal to the elements of brr
at minimal cost. To achieve this, we consider two possible strategies:
-
Direct Transformation: Calculate the cost of transforming elements in
arr
directly to the corresponding elements inbrr
using the operation of adding or subtracting a positive integerx
. This cost is straightforwardly computed as the sum of absolute differences between corresponding elements ofarr
andbrr
. -
Reordering with Splitting: Another approach is to potentially reorder
arr
to better matchbrr
after sorting both arrays and possibly splitarr
into subarrays. The cost for this strategy includes the fixed operation costk
(for any number of splits and reordering), plus the cost of aligning the sorted version ofarr
to the sorted version ofbrr
.
The solution involves computing both costs (c1
for the direct transformation cost and c2
for the reordering with splitting strategy) and selecting the minimum of these costs. This choice leverages the fact that reordering arr
can sometimes align it more closely to brr
with minimal cost, particularly when the fixed cost k
is offset by reduced alignment costs.
Solution Approach
The solution is implemented through a structured approach consisting of the following steps:
-
Calculate Direct Transformation Cost (
c1
):- Use a loop to iterate over paired elements of
arr
andbrr
. - Compute the sum of absolute differences for each pair. This value represents the minimal cost needed to convert
arr
directly intobrr
without any reordering.
c1 = sum(abs(a - b) for a, b in zip(arr, brr))
- Use a loop to iterate over paired elements of
-
Sort and Reorder Arrays:
- Sort both
arr
andbrr
to minimize the cost when computing their difference post-reordering. - This operation facilitates easier alignment by comparing elements at identical indices, thus minimizing conversion costs.
arr.sort() brr.sort()
- Sort both
-
Calculate Reordering Cost with Splitting (
c2
):- The cost includes the fixed splitting and reordering cost
k
. - Add the minimum transformation cost after sorting, which is the sum of absolute differences between the sorted versions of the arrays.
c2 = k + sum(abs(a - b) for a, b in zip(arr, brr))
- The cost includes the fixed splitting and reordering cost
-
Choose the Minimum Cost:
- Compare the two calculated costs,
c1
andc2
, and return the smaller value. - This ensures choosing the most cost-effective approach to make
arr
equal tobrr
.
return min(c1, c2)
- Compare the two calculated costs,
This method efficiently utilizes sorting to capitalize on potential reordering benefits and incorporates the use of absolute differences to determine the transformation costs precisely, thus providing an optimal solution to the problem.
Ready to land your dream job?
Unlock your dream job with a 2-minute evaluator for a personalized learning plan!
Start EvaluatorExample Walkthrough
Let's consider a small example to illustrate the solution approach:
Suppose we have the following inputs:
arr = [1, 3, 5]
brr = [2, 4, 6]
k = 3
We'll use the described solution approach to determine the minimum total cost to make arr
equal to brr
.
-
Calculate Direct Transformation Cost (
c1
):- For each pair of elements (from
arr
andbrr
): compute the absolute difference. - Here, the differences are |1 - 2| = 1, |3 - 4| = 1, |5 - 6| = 1.
- Sum these differences:
c1 = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3
.
Thus,
c1
is 3. - For each pair of elements (from
-
Sort and Reorder Arrays:
- Sort
arr
: [1, 3, 5] (already sorted) - Sort
brr
: [2, 4, 6] (already sorted)
- Sort
-
Calculate Reordering Cost with Splitting (
c2
):- The fixed cost for any reordering operation is
k
, which is 3. - Compute the absolute differences of sorted
arr
andbrr
: |1 - 2| = 1, |3 - 4| = 1, |5 - 6| = 1. - Sum these differences and add the fixed cost
k
:c2 = 3 + (1 + 1 + 1) = 3 + 3 = 6
.
- The fixed cost for any reordering operation is
-
Choose the Minimum Cost:
- Compare
c1
andc2
: - Since
c1
(3) <c2
(6), the minimal cost is 3.
- Compare
The optimal strategy is the Direct Transformation without any reordering in this case, costing a total of 3.
Solution Implementation
1from typing import List
2
3class Solution:
4 def minCost(self, arr: List[int], brr: List[int], k: int) -> int:
5 # Calculate the initial cost as the sum of absolute differences of corresponding elements
6 c1 = sum(abs(a - b) for a, b in zip(arr, brr))
7
8 # Sort both arrays
9 arr.sort()
10 brr.sort()
11
12 # Calculate the alternative cost with the sorted arrays plus a constant k
13 c2 = k + sum(abs(a - b) for a, b in zip(arr, brr))
14
15 # Return the minimum of the two calculated costs
16 return min(c1, c2)
17
1import java.util.Arrays;
2
3class Solution {
4 public long minCost(int[] arr, int[] brr, long penaltyCost) {
5 // Calculate initial cost without sorting
6 long initialCost = calc(arr, brr);
7
8 // Sort both arrays to potentially minimize cost
9 Arrays.sort(arr);
10 Arrays.sort(brr);
11
12 // Calculate sorted cost with additional penalty
13 long sortedCostWithPenalty = calc(arr, brr) + penaltyCost;
14
15 // Return the minimum of initial cost or sorted cost with penalty
16 return Math.min(initialCost, sortedCostWithPenalty);
17 }
18
19 private long calc(int[] arr, int[] brr) {
20 long totalCost = 0;
21
22 // Iterate through both arrays to calculate the sum of absolute differences
23 for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; ++i) {
24 totalCost += Math.abs(arr[i] - brr[i]);
25 }
26
27 return totalCost;
28 }
29}
30
1#include <vector>
2#include <algorithm>
3#include <cmath>
4#include <numeric>
5
6class Solution {
7public:
8 long long minCost(std::vector<int>& arr, std::vector<int>& brr, long long k) {
9 // Lambda to calculate the total pairwise absolute difference between two arrays
10 auto calculateDifference = [](const std::vector<int>& arr, const std::vector<int>& brr) {
11 long long totalDifference = 0;
12 for (size_t i = 0; i < arr.size(); ++i) {
13 totalDifference += std::abs(arr[i] - brr[i]);
14 }
15 return totalDifference;
16 };
17
18 // Calculate the cost without sorting
19 long long originalCost = calculateDifference(arr, brr);
20
21 // Sort both arrays
22 std::sort(arr.begin(), arr.end());
23 std::sort(brr.begin(), brr.end());
24
25 // Calculate the cost with sorted arrays and add k to it
26 long long sortedCost = calculateDifference(arr, brr) + k;
27
28 // Return the minimum of the original cost and the sorted cost
29 return std::min(originalCost, sortedCost);
30 }
31};
32
1// Function to calculate the minimum cost to make two arrays equal by using at most k operations
2function minCost(arr: number[], brr: number[], k: number): number {
3
4 // Helper function to calculate the sum of absolute differences between two arrays
5 const calc = (a: number[], b: number[]): number => {
6 let totalCost = 0;
7 for (let i = 0; i < a.length; ++i) {
8 totalCost += Math.abs(a[i] - b[i]);
9 }
10 return totalCost;
11 };
12
13 // Calculate the cost without any modification
14 const c1 = calc(arr, brr);
15
16 // Sort both arrays to find the optimal matching pairing elements in a sorted order
17 arr.sort((a, b) => a - b);
18 brr.sort((a, b) => a - b);
19
20 // Calculate the cost with the sorted arrays plus the extra allowed operations cost
21 const c2 = calc(arr, brr) + k;
22
23 // Return the minimum of the two calculated costs
24 return Math.min(c1, c2);
25}
26
Time and Space Complexity
The time complexity of the code is mainly determined by two parts: the computation of the initial cost and the sorting operations.
-
Computation of Initial Cost (
c1
):- The computation of
c1
involves iterating over both lists usingzip
and calculating the absolute difference for each pair. This operation isO(n)
wheren
is the length of the lists.
- The computation of
-
Sorting:
- Sorting both
arr
andbrr
involvesO(n log n)
time complexity since sorting an array ofn
elements isO(n log n)
.
- Sorting both
-
Computation of Sorted Cost (
c2
):- After sorting, the computation of
c2
involves a similar operation asc1
, iterating over both lists and calculating the absolute difference for each pair. This costsO(n)
as well.
- After sorting, the computation of
Finally, the computation involves taking the minimum of c1
and c2
, which is a constant-time operation O(1)
.
Therefore, the overall time complexity of the code is O(n log n)
.
The space complexity of the code is O(1)
, as the algorithm uses only a constant amount of additional space besides the input and output, primarily for variables like c1
and c2
.
Learn more about how to find time and space complexity quickly.
Consider the classic dynamic programming of longest increasing subsequence:
Find the length of the longest subsequence of a given sequence such that all elements of the subsequence are sorted in increasing order.
For example, the length of LIS for [50, 3, 10, 7, 40, 80]
is 4
and LIS is
[3, 7, 40, 80]
.
What is the recurrence relation?
Recommended Readings
Greedy Introduction div class responsive iframe iframe src https www youtube com embed WTslqPbj7I title YouTube video player frameborder 0 allow accelerometer autoplay clipboard write encrypted media gyroscope picture in picture web share allowfullscreen iframe div When do we use greedy Greedy algorithms tend to solve optimization problems Typically they will ask you to calculate the max min of some value Commonly you may see this phrased in the problem as max min longest shortest largest smallest etc These keywords can be identified by just scanning
Sorting Summary Comparisons We presented quite a few sorting algorithms and it is essential to know the advantages and disadvantages of each one The basic algorithms are easy to visualize and easy to learn for beginner programmers because of their simplicity As such they will suffice if you don't know any advanced
Coding Interview Patterns Your Personal Dijkstra's Algorithm to Landing Your Dream Job The goal of AlgoMonster is to help you get a job in the shortest amount of time possible in a data driven way We compiled datasets of tech interview problems and broke them down by patterns This way
Want a Structured Path to Master System Design Too? Donโt Miss This!